Ausmini
It is currently Sun Apr 28, 2024 11:31 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 37 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: BPR5ES or BPR6ES
PostPosted: Thu Feb 28, 2019 6:07 pm 
Offline
1275cc
1275cc
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 3:07 pm
Posts: 5071
Location: The Internet
GuamMini wrote:
gtogreen1969 wrote:
GuamMini wrote:
I was using a BP6ES and it fouls after idling for a while so now I am going to try a BPR4ES. My question is on my 1973 Clubman GT do I use 91 or 87 unleaded fuel or do I use a lead additive and which octane fuel rating? thanks

Use 95 or 98 fuel. Why are you jumping BP5 and going straight to BP4?


I am tired of buying plugs so I thought 4 should be better. The 6 lasted for a few months. Yes we have 87 and 91 AKI. No 93. Do I need to add a lead substitute? I have not been using one.
You will always get a yes and no answer to the lead substitute debate. I use it in my Cooper S. I have not data on if it helps or not but i dont want to take the chance. I only do low km so the cost is negligible. I did use a cap of 2 stroke oil when unleaded first started and before i found lead substitutes.

Some guys over here run 98 with no lead substitute and have no problems. If i had a daily driver doing high kms i would run it until my next rebuild then change to unleaded seats.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: BPR5ES or BPR6ES
PostPosted: Fri Mar 01, 2019 8:22 am 
Offline
848cc
848cc
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2016 11:27 am
Posts: 356
Location: Mangilao, Guam
Thank you very much

_________________
1973 Clubman GT - YG2S8 1637


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: BPR5ES or BPR6ES
PostPosted: Fri Mar 01, 2019 12:00 pm 
Offline
998cc
998cc

Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2014 12:36 pm
Posts: 608
Location: Bentleigh, Melbourne
Assuming you have have hardened valve seats fitted there is no need for a lead based i.e. TEL additive. They were/ are? used to boost the octane rating of the fuel. My engine has a compression ratio of 11:1 and I have no issues running pump fuel, this included the time I drove the car in Indonesia (I did carry octane booster with me but never had to use it). I choose to use 98 RON fuel but can get away with 95 RON.

_________________
67 Deluxe
Dry suspension
1293cc, 11:1 comp, RE 282 camshaft, 45 Weber, extractors etc
4 synchro close ratio gbox
Cooper S brakes, no booster
Stealth box, as Doc says "goes harder and idles!"
RH tank cos I needed it crossing the Nullarbor etc..


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: BPR5ES or BPR6ES
PostPosted: Fri Mar 01, 2019 4:31 pm 
Offline
998cc
998cc

Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2011 8:33 pm
Posts: 1147
GuamMini wrote:
I was using a BP6ES and it fouls after idling for a while so now I am going to try a BPR4ES. My question is on my 1973 Clubman GT do I use 91 or 87 unleaded fuel or do I use a lead additive and which octane fuel rating? thanks


IMHO a basic 6ES plug will last basically forever in a normal road engine that is any sort of reasonable tune... Unlike some cars, a Mini engine in any reasonable state of tune doesn't eat plugs.

And the second question is pretty much ..how long is a piece of string..... A 73 GT should be quite happy with 87 (US) octane... but it pretty much depends on the state of tune.

Many people will tell you that 93 to 1 compression ratios require X octane .. but that's a pretty useless statement. Your engines octane demand depends on its operating compression; not the static ratio you measure when the engine is being built. This operating compression is determined by a whole host of factors including things like the static compression, how well the head and carbs flow air, what kind of cam you have, what revs you're running at etc etc.

So the answer is... does it ping? If it does then a higher octane fuel MAY (but not not necessarily) help. But it is worth trying because you DO NOT WANT the engine to ping.. Try the 87 and if it pings move up to the 91. Excess octane does absolutely nothing for you except drain your wallet.

As to the second part of the question... should I use a lead substitute? The answer is pretty much ..Yes.

Lead in fuel does 2 things; it raises the octane rating and lubricates and protects the valve seats in iron heads.... like that fitted to your GT. You can get products that do one or the other ..or both. You need one that will protect the valve seats ..and you may benefit from the increased octane.

Many years ago when leaded fuel was being phased out in Oz (and other places) BP ran some technical seminars where they reported on testing they did in the UK. Usefully for us they used an A series in a Metro as a test mule. They sent the Metro off on a series of test runs on the motorways and found that, if kept below about 3000 rpm, the removal of lead had little or no bad effect. However, if run at substantially more than 3K for extended periods, the engine was trashed in about 10,000miles...

You pays your money and takes your chances.....

Cheers, Ian


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: BPR5ES or BPR6ES
PostPosted: Fri Mar 01, 2019 7:05 pm 
Offline
998cc
998cc

Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2014 12:36 pm
Posts: 608
Location: Bentleigh, Melbourne
"Many years ago when leaded fuel was being phased out in Oz (and other places) BP ran some technical seminars where they reported on testing they did in the UK. Usefully for us they used an A series in a Metro as a test mule. They sent the Metro off on a series of test runs on the motorways and found that, if kept below about 3000 rpm, the removal of lead had little or no bad effect. However, if run at substantially more than 3K for extended periods, the engine was trashed in about 10,000miles... "

Well, about the time this was going on it was realised that hardened valve seats were necessary to avoid exactly this problem (valve seat recession) so for decades now hardened seats have been fitted as a matter of course during overhaul. So unless GuamMini's cylinder head is stock standard from the early 1970's, there is no need to add a TEL additive for its lubricant properties. As you already pointed out, it's extremely unlikely it is needed to boost the octane rating of the fuel...

_________________
67 Deluxe
Dry suspension
1293cc, 11:1 comp, RE 282 camshaft, 45 Weber, extractors etc
4 synchro close ratio gbox
Cooper S brakes, no booster
Stealth box, as Doc says "goes harder and idles!"
RH tank cos I needed it crossing the Nullarbor etc..


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: BPR5ES or BPR6ES
PostPosted: Fri Mar 01, 2019 8:46 pm 
Offline
998cc
998cc

Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2011 8:33 pm
Posts: 1147
deluxe67 wrote:
"Many years ago ....
Well, about the time this was going on it was realised that hardened valve seats were necessary to avoid exactly this problem (valve seat recession) so for decades now hardened seats have been fitted as a matter of course during overhaul. So unless GuamMini's cylinder head is stock standard from the early 1970's, there is no need to add a TEL additive for its lubricant properties. As you already pointed out, it's extremely unlikely it is needed to boost the octane rating of the fuel...


Think your timings a bit out there.... it wasn't until 86 that new cars were required to be built to take unleaded fuel and leaded didn't disappear until 2002...

If Jim's happy he has hardened seats then he won't need a lead replacement...

Or he could just choose to gamble..

Cheers, Ian


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: BPR5ES or BPR6ES
PostPosted: Sat Mar 02, 2019 1:54 am 
Offline
998cc
998cc

Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2014 12:36 pm
Posts: 608
Location: Bentleigh, Melbourne
No, my timing in not out. I was a Petroleum Chemist working for Shell in 1986 when ULP was introduced, reread my post above. I went on to operate, maintain, overhaul and train people to use octane engines for 20 years so I guess I know a bit about what I'm talking about. If you have any questions I'm happy to discuss...

_________________
67 Deluxe
Dry suspension
1293cc, 11:1 comp, RE 282 camshaft, 45 Weber, extractors etc
4 synchro close ratio gbox
Cooper S brakes, no booster
Stealth box, as Doc says "goes harder and idles!"
RH tank cos I needed it crossing the Nullarbor etc..


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: BPR5ES or BPR6ES
PostPosted: Sat Mar 02, 2019 4:49 am 
Offline
religious status
religious status
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 6:19 pm
Posts: 39643
Location: near Baulkham Hills, NSW
I recut the valve seats in a 998 head 20 years ago, put it on my son's clubby for 6 months and he drove it as usual ( like he stole it).
It then had serious valve recession, 'seats' were rough as the hot valves had pulled metal out.
OTOH on my 1360's head the valves and 'seats' were shiny after 15,000 miles when using Flashlube.
Dunno what's in it but it works.

There are still many A series heads being reconditioned without hardened seats being fitted. Many racers don't trust that they won't come loose. There are right and wrong ways to fit inserts.
Edit- for clarity.

_________________
DrMini- 1970 wasaMatic 1360, Mk1S crank, 86.6HP (ATW) =~125 @ crank, 45 Dellorto (38 chokes), RE282 sprint cam, 1.5 rockers, 11.0:1 C/R. :mrgreen:


Last edited by drmini in aust on Mon Mar 04, 2019 11:18 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: BPR5ES or BPR6ES
PostPosted: Mon Mar 04, 2019 8:28 am 
Offline
848cc
848cc
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2016 11:27 am
Posts: 356
Location: Mangilao, Guam
From what I was told my GT has the stock valve seats. I am going to try and use a lead additive. Nothing to loose at this point. I might replace the head soon with something that has hardened seats for unleaded fuel. Thanks everyone for a wealth of knowledge

_________________
1973 Clubman GT - YG2S8 1637


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: BPR5ES or BPR6ES
PostPosted: Mon Mar 04, 2019 1:41 pm 
Offline
998cc
998cc

Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2014 12:36 pm
Posts: 608
Location: Bentleigh, Melbourne
Might be difficult to get hold of a lead (TEL) based additive. I think the ones available usually use MMT, a Manganese organo metallic compound. Performs similar to TEL.

_________________
67 Deluxe
Dry suspension
1293cc, 11:1 comp, RE 282 camshaft, 45 Weber, extractors etc
4 synchro close ratio gbox
Cooper S brakes, no booster
Stealth box, as Doc says "goes harder and idles!"
RH tank cos I needed it crossing the Nullarbor etc..


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: BPR5ES or BPR6ES
PostPosted: Mon Mar 04, 2019 4:34 pm 
Offline
religious status
religious status
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 6:19 pm
Posts: 39643
Location: near Baulkham Hills, NSW
Manganese ones like Valvemaster crap up the plugs and ports. I used it for a short time, never again.
I'd import some Flashlube it's made here in Sydney.
Originally designed for taxis running iron heads and LPG. Which have the same seat recession problem.

https://flashlube.com/en/where-to-buy-flashlube.html

_________________
DrMini- 1970 wasaMatic 1360, Mk1S crank, 86.6HP (ATW) =~125 @ crank, 45 Dellorto (38 chokes), RE282 sprint cam, 1.5 rockers, 11.0:1 C/R. :mrgreen:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: BPR5ES or BPR6ES
PostPosted: Fri Mar 08, 2019 8:39 am 
Offline
848cc
848cc
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2016 11:27 am
Posts: 356
Location: Mangilao, Guam
Here in the US the additive is by a company called gunk and they said to put a whole bottle and filling yup the tank after. I will give this a try.....

_________________
1973 Clubman GT - YG2S8 1637


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: BPR5ES or BPR6ES
PostPosted: Fri Mar 08, 2019 9:09 am 
Offline
1360cc
1360cc
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2004 11:32 am
Posts: 12390
Location: Sthrn HiLoLands, NSW, Australia
Gunk...

https://www.autobarn.net/chm37-12.html

https://www.bobistheoilguy.com/forums/u ... ber=866488

_________________
"Show me the Mini!"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: BPR5ES or BPR6ES
PostPosted: Fri Mar 08, 2019 2:14 pm 
Offline
998cc
998cc

Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2014 12:36 pm
Posts: 608
Location: Bentleigh, Melbourne
From the Gunk Valve Medic MSDS;




COMPOSITION/INFORMATION ON INGREDIENTS
Ingredients CAS # Wt.%
Petroleum distillates 68476-34-6
85.00 - 95.00
Distillates (petroleum), hydrotreated heavy 64742-52-5
naphthenic 7.00 - 13.00
Solvent refined heavy paraffinic distillate 64741-88-4
0.10 - 1.00
Naphthalene 91-20-3
0.10 - 1.00
Xylene 1330-20-7
0.10 - 1.00


I fail to see any ingredient in that lot that would reduce valve seat recession. It's all just hydrocarbons, personally I wouldn't bother. Waste of money..

Edit: Just read Gunk doesn't claim this stuff will prevent valve seat recession. They claim it's to dissolve sludge, gum and deposits only...

_________________
67 Deluxe
Dry suspension
1293cc, 11:1 comp, RE 282 camshaft, 45 Weber, extractors etc
4 synchro close ratio gbox
Cooper S brakes, no booster
Stealth box, as Doc says "goes harder and idles!"
RH tank cos I needed it crossing the Nullarbor etc..


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: BPR5ES or BPR6ES
PostPosted: Sat Mar 09, 2019 10:18 pm 
Offline
1275cc
1275cc
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 5:03 pm
Posts: 2729
Location: Out in the shed cleaning up my own mess.
Plenty of snake oil salesmen in the days of wild west of the USA.
It appears nothing has changed......... :lol:

_________________
1967 Cooper S - new front bearings to do.
1965 Cooper S shell - all painted up, ready for fit out.
1969 Cooper S Mk2 - claimed by 2nd. born
1966 Deluxe- next rustoration!
Mk 2 & XJ6 Jags. Less said the better.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 37 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 51 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

cron

© 2016 Ausmini. All garage work involves equal measures of enthusiasm, ingenuity and a fair degree of irresponsibility.