Ausmini
It is currently Fri Apr 26, 2024 12:35 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 23 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Jun 05, 2007 1:16 pm 
Offline
848cc
848cc

Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2004 2:45 pm
Posts: 53
Location: Fremantle, Australia
Thought I'd change the subject of this thread to better describe the problem I'm having.

Hi All,

Sorry, I've been off-line for a while....not enough time to work on my Minis.

I've got a question about roller-rockers.

I've inherited a fairly hot Cooper S with a 1380 motor. Every time it is brought to the track it blows a heap of oil out the breathers and into the catch tank.

Thinking it was a blow-by / ring problem, it had a rebuild, but the problem has remained.

Talking to people at the track it appears that if a motor has roller rockers it is necessary to restrict the amount of oil that can get to the rockers, otherwise the rocker cover can fill very quickly and oil can be forced out the breathers before it has a chance to fall back into the gearbox.

I have heard of people using a restrictor in the oil gallery to the rockers.

Anyone know what size this restrictor should be?


Cheers,

Dave


Last edited by Dave Elliott on Wed Jun 06, 2007 10:06 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Rockers
PostPosted: Tue Jun 05, 2007 2:38 pm 
Offline
1360cc
1360cc
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2004 11:32 am
Posts: 12390
Location: Sthrn HiLoLands, NSW, Australia
Firstly Dave...I don't think your problem has anything to do with roller rockers....sure sounds like the average Mini pressurising the sump problem to me :idea:

Ian (1071) reckons:

Not really relevant IMHO. The standard rockers do not impact/control the flow of oil to the top of the engine. This oil flow is controlled by a groove in the front bearing face of the cam shaft and a corresponding exit hole in the front cam bearing.

If you insert the cam bearing back to front you get an uninterrupted oil flow to the rockers and a problem something like that described...

My Titan roller rockers performed perfectly for many years without any such issue ..but subsequently failed when exposed to 9000+ rpm :(

Cheers, Ian

_________________
"Show me the Mini!"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 05, 2007 2:56 pm 
Offline
848cc
848cc

Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2004 2:45 pm
Posts: 53
Location: Fremantle, Australia
Thanks for the reply Ian.

Sure, I agree, the crankcase is pressurising, especially at the revs this motor pulls, however under normal conditions this should only cause a minimum of oil to be thrown into the catch-can.

I know it depends where the breathers are and what type they are. In my case the motor has 4 breathers and without fail it’s only the rocker cover breather pipe that shows signs of passing a lot of oil.

I'm sure that there is too much oil flow to, and sufficient drainage from the rocker cover area. Once the rocker cover is full crankcase pressure increases because I have effectively lost one breather and the situation then gets worse.

Roller rockers do not need as much lubrication as plain bearing or bushes and I think that by cutting down the oil flow to the rocker assembly that you stop the rocket cover filling too fast.

Reducing the oil flow to the rockers might not solve the problem I have, but it may stop one of the symptoms.


Cheers,

Dave


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 05, 2007 4:52 pm 
Offline
1098cc
1098cc
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2005 1:03 pm
Posts: 1540
Location: Napier, NZ
I'm lost - rollers may or may not need less lubrication, but that's irrelevant. Why would rollers make the top cover fill more/faster than it would with standard rockers?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 05, 2007 5:16 pm 
Offline
848cc
848cc

Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2004 2:45 pm
Posts: 53
Location: Fremantle, Australia
Sorry for the confusion.

A 1380 motor (73.5mm bore) running at revs between 4000 and 7000 rpm is going to send a lot of oil to the top of the motor. I dare say the same engine with normal rockers would also fill up the rocker cover under the same conditions.

I have been told that roller rockers require less lubrication. This means that I could restrict the amount of oil getting up to the top of the motor. If I can do that, the oil may be able to drain back into the gearbox faster than it is supplied to the rockers.

If I can achieve this, filling up my catch-can should be a thing of the past.

Does anyone know the hole size of a restrictor to reduce the oil flow to the rockers?


Cheers,

Dave


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 05, 2007 5:54 pm 
Offline
998cc
998cc
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 20, 2005 9:18 pm
Posts: 807
Location: Adelaide
I remember seeing something in the Mini Experience (maybe 2 or 3 issues ago) a few months ago where they restricted the oil flow up top, it was an interview with someone that tuned mini engines in the 60's.

Will try and remember to have a look for you

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 05, 2007 7:13 pm 
Offline
998cc
998cc
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 18, 2006 4:57 am
Posts: 515
Location: Hamburg, Germany
to my knowlege: yes, roller bearing rockers needs less oil than normal bushed rockers. the needle bearings have more spaces where the oil will be pushed out (between the needles and outer race/cage).
you may wach it by watching inside the filler neck and revving the engine, the oil may spray out of the rockers.

_________________
Rover 214 atm ....


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 05, 2007 7:45 pm 
Offline
religious status
religious status
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 6:19 pm
Posts: 39642
Location: near Baulkham Hills, NSW
The usual method of restricting it is tap the oil feed hole at top of block then screw a grubscrew in, with a small hole drilled in it to restrict flow. I'd say for full rollers, a 1.5mm hole would be a good start. :wink:

_________________
DrMini- 1970 wasaMatic 1360, Mk1S crank, 86.6HP (ATW) =~125 @ crank, 45 Dellorto (38 chokes), RE282 sprint cam, 1.5 rockers, 11.0:1 C/R. :mrgreen:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: hi dave
PostPosted: Tue Jun 05, 2007 8:32 pm 
Offline
848cc
848cc
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 24, 2005 10:30 pm
Posts: 345
Location: Jarrahdale
i'm having the same problem as you my motor is also a 1380 but i;ve got sandard rockers and my motor has only done 900klms since it's rebuild :(


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: hi dave
PostPosted: Tue Jun 05, 2007 8:40 pm 
Offline
848cc
848cc
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2005 11:31 am
Posts: 419
Location: Jarrahdale, WA
mr moke wrote:
i'm having the same problem as you my motor is also a 1380 but i;ve got sandard rockers and my motor has only done 900klms since it's rebuild :(


Nah, your's is your own fault for getting all those backyard yobbos to work on your car. . . :D


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: hi pete
PostPosted: Tue Jun 05, 2007 9:42 pm 
Offline
848cc
848cc
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 24, 2005 10:30 pm
Posts: 345
Location: Jarrahdale
come on no;1 yobbo don't be like this if you were a good yobbo you would fix it for me :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 06, 2007 9:53 am 
Offline
848cc
848cc

Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2004 2:45 pm
Posts: 53
Location: Fremantle, Australia
britishvita wrote:
I remember seeing something in the Mini Experience (maybe 2 or 3 issues ago) a few months ago where they restricted the oil flow up top, it was an interview with someone that tuned mini engines in the 60's.

Will try and remember to have a look for you


Must not have read my copy cover to cover as I usually do :)

We're moving house shortly and my wife has already started packing....no idea where she's hidden my Mini mags.

It would be great if you could find the article.


Thanks,

Dave


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 06, 2007 11:26 am 
Offline
Bimmer Twinky
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 4:36 pm
Posts: 8606
Location: Brisbane
There is another way to combat the problem without taking the cyl head off etc, & that is to simply make 2 decent sized drain pipes , externally from each end of the rocker cover back to the both the primary case breather & the fuel pump hole in the block. both these places are perfect for both crank case breathing pipes & oil drain return pipes

i fit this system on all our race engines & large road/rally engines regardless of whether the cyl head gets too much oil or not.

_________________
No offence intended here but--> anyone writing a book about minis 30 years ago may not have experienced such worn or stuffed-with components as we are finding these days.

You should put your heart & soul into everything you do.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 06, 2007 1:10 pm 
Offline
848cc
848cc

Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2004 2:45 pm
Posts: 53
Location: Fremantle, Australia
TheMiniMan wrote:
There is another way to combat the problem without taking the cyl head off etc, & that is to simply make 2 decent sized drain pipes , externally from each end of the rocker cover back to the both the primary case breather & the fuel pump hole in the block. both these places are perfect for both crank case breathing pipes & oil drain return pipes

I fit this system on all our race engines & large road/rally engines regardless of whether the cyl head gets too much oil or not.


Yep, this is what I have set up too, on a slightly smaller scale; any oil getting to the catch can is drained back into the sump via the fuel pump hole.

However what I find is happening (probably due to excessive blow-by at high revs) is that the rocker cover fills up and oil starts weeping from around the oil filler cap (non vented type). I don't think this is an ideal situation and would prefer to reduce the amount of oil getting up there in the first place.

Is there "blow-by" normally generated from the valve guides? This may be the cause of the over presure I'm experiencing in the rocker cover. If the supply of oil is too great for the normal head-to-sump drainage path then this path is effectively blocked and any additional blow-by pressure in the rocker cover will result in oil being forced out the easiest path (the breather pipe).

Dave


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 06, 2007 4:40 pm 
Offline
Yay For Hay!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2004 9:27 pm
Posts: 15870
Location: Wodonga - Vic/NSW border
I reckon the cam bearing is in upside down - I can't see how roller rockers would CAUSE more oil to be in the rocker cover - they may not NEED as much oil, but wouldn't CAUSE more to go up there

Dave Elliott wrote:
Yep, this is what I have set up too, on a slightly smaller scale; any oil getting to the catch can is drained back into the sump via the fuel pump hole.


PS: it's not an S motor if it has a fuel pump hole... but I'll get back in my box now

_________________
did I tell you that I won a trophy?


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 23 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 33 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

© 2016 Ausmini. All garage work involves equal measures of enthusiasm, ingenuity and a fair degree of irresponsibility.