"some exec"?
Any details on who, when and where, as well as the quote would be of interest. History shows, though, that there are many privately-owned ex-Works cars of various brands, not just Minis. There are also plenty of replicas out there. Sometimes differentiating between the real McCoy and the fake can be difficult.
We know the car featured in Issue 2 of The Mini Experience (LRX 828E) is authentic.
We also know that the body of another Mini being rebuilt in Australia at the moment is authentic, and that there is also claimed in the UK that the same genuine car is over there, now restored.
A problem arises in that, if a car was damaged and rebuilt by the factory team, as often happened, and the identity of the car changed over (as with LRX 828E), or that sometimes the car was simply "re-configured" to suit different events, by simply swapping the ID to another complete car, that sometimes people have been known to build up "genuine" cars from the discarded parts. If the identity has been put onto another car, and that car sold by the factory wearing that ID, then the other car made up from parts, no matter how genuine the parts may be, is not the genuine car.
Usual rule of thumb is that the last car sold by the factory bearing the identitiy is the genuine car.
But, another question arises in that, if a car competes famously and wins events, then the ID is swapped over to another car, which is not successful, and the second car is sold, then someone who has the original car, complete, and puts the old ID back on that car, could claim to have the genuine car. Confusing, innit?
Now, that exec quoted in the previous posting, may have been stating what he believed to be the case at the time, but as I said earlier, history shows him to be incorrect.
Watto.
