AJ wrote:
low'n blown wrote:
There were only a very few 69 S's without plates, spanning 2 1/2 months, Yet I have seen more "early" 69 models than you can poke a stick at. I personally would never own an S without a plate unless it had a history to prove it was one of those early MK2's. Until recently my father was the second owner of a MK 1 1/2, which had all the original pruchase documents etc and was totally original and unrestored. Even then people would still question its validity until its history was told. Does not having a plate make this 1970 car any less of a Cooper S. Your damn right it does. WIthout the correct identification all you have is a mini shell with S type tags and brackets. I would be more concerned about where that plate actually is. Is it currently on a car that is rego'd with those numbers. If so you have a good fight on your hands proving who owns those numbers.
Very well said about the identification ....... However the 1969 S was produced from May 1969 , through to sometime in December 1969 without a Compliance Plate , a period of about 8 months , in which time there would have been around 800 - 900 cars produced ....... I believe that some cars were produced late December 1969 with a Compliance Plate ...
Umm, without the compliance plate you still have a Cooper S with all the numbers still stamped on the body in the right places.
You can still register a car without a compliance plate. You can still prove the identity of the car.
Being a 1970 car the original plate probably had a hole corroded through the car number anyway. (just like a lot of cars I have looked at)
You need to look at everything and not just the plate.