Ausmini
It is currently Mon Jul 21, 2025 7:02 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 25 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: couple for Coatsie
PostPosted: Mon Feb 22, 2016 9:38 am 
Offline
1098cc
1098cc

Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2004 3:57 pm
Posts: 1478
Location: queensland
Morris 1100 wrote:
It was the state Sports Sedan associations that reformed the class from "Sports Racing (Closed) into Sport Sedans and not really CAMS.
The highly modified cars could have kept racing as Sports Cars.


I believe you're correct. The change in silhouette rule was more for safety than restricting speed. Too many dodgy cut and shut jobs.

_________________
1970 Cooper S ex-Bathurst & ATCC
1964 Austin Cooper S ex-Group C race car
1967 Morris Cooper S ex-Group B
1962 Mini Speed sports sedan
1968-71 ex-Peter Manton Shell car


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: couple for Coatsie
PostPosted: Mon Feb 22, 2016 12:53 pm 
Offline
Causing or creating vexation

Joined: Wed Jul 21, 2004 10:32 pm
Posts: 19124
I think some of it was from the competitors themselves wanting a firm line in the sand for Sports Sedans. They wanted to move away from the total freedom of Sports Closed to reduce costs (by making the fastest car illegal)

This is the same sort of thinking that has blighted Sports Sedans ever since.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: couple for Coatsie
PostPosted: Tue Feb 23, 2016 6:49 am 
Offline
1098cc
1098cc

Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2004 3:57 pm
Posts: 1478
Location: queensland
I just love the freedom of sports sedans. Your open to express whatever ideas you want to put into a car, without the myriad of rules and bullship interpretations that follow. Love the honesty

_________________
1970 Cooper S ex-Bathurst & ATCC
1964 Austin Cooper S ex-Group C race car
1967 Morris Cooper S ex-Group B
1962 Mini Speed sports sedan
1968-71 ex-Peter Manton Shell car


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: couple for Coatsie
PostPosted: Wed Feb 24, 2016 7:31 am 
Offline
1360cc
1360cc
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2004 11:32 am
Posts: 12390
Location: Sthrn HiLoLands, NSW, Australia
low n blown wrote:
I just love the freedom of sports sedans. Your open to express whatever ideas you want to put into a car, without the myriad of rules and bullship interpretations that follow. Love the honesty


As Mozza1100 has alluded to...only up to a point though...some efforts are still being "banned" :?

_________________
"Show me the Mini!"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: couple for Coatsie
PostPosted: Wed Feb 24, 2016 9:34 am 
Offline
Causing or creating vexation

Joined: Wed Jul 21, 2004 10:32 pm
Posts: 19124
The high weight is the most recent one.
Blokes with stupidly heavy cars were complaining about cars with expensive lightweight materials.
Then they allow plastic bodies...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: couple for Coatsie
PostPosted: Wed Feb 24, 2016 5:26 pm 
Offline
998cc
998cc

Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2007 9:00 pm
Posts: 1127
Location: Down South
low n blown wrote:
The engine was originally a 5 port Mk1 S engine in race spec. John was good friends with Richard Longman and acquired a head and split webers on manifold off Richard own race car, whilst he was in the UK. John also had a supercharger setup for the car, which I sold on here to I believe was Monaco (from memory). Was a really nice kit and great for a road car, but not an ideal setup for a race car. Appart from that, yes the lack of weight and aero advantage had something to do with the car's performance. John was quite well off compared to most racers, and always managed to have the best money could buy, so looking through the engine and spares that came with it, theres no wonder it was competitive.


You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: couple for Coatsie
PostPosted: Wed Feb 24, 2016 5:35 pm 
Offline
998cc
998cc

Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2005 1:26 pm
Posts: 817
Location: Adelaide
I seem to recall an advertisement that used to appear regularly during the sixties in Modern Motor and Wheels magazines for Ekins supercharger conversion kits for Austin 1800 B series engines too. It was claimed to transform the car's performance.

_________________
Slide
1965 Mini Van (1360)
1970 Mk2 Cooper S (1310)
1978 Rover SD1 V8 (4.6)
1996 Land Rover Discovery V8 (4.0)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: couple for Coatsie
PostPosted: Wed Feb 24, 2016 5:43 pm 
Offline
998cc
998cc

Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2007 9:00 pm
Posts: 1127
Location: Down South
slide wrote:
I seem to recall an advertisement that used to appear regularly during the sixties in Modern Motor and Wheels magazines for Ekins supercharger conversion kits for Austin 1800 B series engines too. It was claimed to transform the car's performance.


That would be correct. He made a number of kits, some better than others depending on the manifold design. I also have a Shorrock kit and this looks like a much more efficient blower.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: couple for Coatsie
PostPosted: Wed Feb 24, 2016 8:57 pm 
Offline
998cc
998cc

Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2007 9:00 pm
Posts: 1127
Location: Down South
........


You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: couple for Coatsie
PostPosted: Wed Feb 24, 2016 8:58 pm 
Offline
998cc
998cc

Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2007 9:00 pm
Posts: 1127
Location: Down South
.....


You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 25 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Barkfast, Bing [Bot] and 81 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

© 2016 Ausmini. All garage work involves equal measures of enthusiasm, ingenuity and a fair degree of irresponsibility.