camp freddy wrote:
mediaatt wrote:
camp freddy wrote:
mediaatt wrote:
The "other" one was also pretty clean but missing the plates - this is the Mini as reviewed in Fast Four and Rotaries - went for $9300 and I think that was a good buy - what do you guys think ??
Fast Fours ReviewCheers
DICK
As long as you realise you have not bought a genuine Cooper S you have probably done OK!
The article clearly states the original body was blown away by the sandblaster. Article claims 1969 S but body shell is 12/70 at earliest mini K shell. May even be clubman with round front fitted.
Couldn't be considered a reshelled cooper S because shell is not right for the car it was to replace, so just a bitsa!
Hi Freddy - not sure where you got the 12/70 info from - but the doors are from a late model MK2 and the have butchered the rear (nicely done) to fit the clubby lights..
The ONLY stamping on the body is the numbers 05 and 36118 on the radiator cowl - it has all the other signs of being a cooper s body...
I would be interested if the cowl numbers shed any light on the body...
DICK
Dick,
To answer your question about where I got the 12/70 date from.
The fact is that those doors will simply not fit on a mini built any earlier than that without serious modification. The door jam in the body is completley different to accept the later type of door catches!
the modification isn't that serious, can be done quite neatly by someone who knows what they're doing
however, it's not a genuine S shell - from memory when I looked at it on ebay, it had some fairly obvious non-S markings
Quote:
The ONLY stamping on the body is the numbers 05 and 36118 on the radiator cowl - it has all the other signs of being a cooper s body...
99% sure those numbers make it a late mini deluxe shell
edit: the radiator shoud stampings for S's are as follows:
a MK1 S will have
M2 06 followed by a number between 0 and about 5000
a MK2 S have
YG2S4 followed by a number between 0 and about 2400
_________________
did I tell you that I won a
trophy?