Ausmini
It is currently Sun Aug 10, 2025 5:20 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 81 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 12, 2010 7:48 pm 
Offline
Postally Verbose
Postally Verbose
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 02, 2006 9:12 am
Posts: 19595
Location: Northern NSW
Well the photo's a bit hard to read (hadn't realised how filthy the plate was ) but the code is AKFPD19Y , which when you use the deciphering given before comes out as a 1979 build whilst being complied 8/81 ... If only the RTA would accept that and let me put it on club plates this year instead of waiting till next year :evil:

Image

A nice , original engine bay (except for the colour of the new master cylinder cap .....) ,

Image

The floor mat's ,

Image

and the cut edge of the floor mat ,

Image

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 12, 2010 7:54 pm 
Offline
Causing or creating vexation

Joined: Wed Jul 21, 2004 10:32 pm
Posts: 19124
sports850 wrote:
Well the photo's a bit hard to read (hadn't realised how filthy the plate was ) but the code is AKFPD19Y , which when you use the deciphering given before comes out as a 1979 build whilst being complied 8/81 ... If only the RTA would accept that and let me put it on club plates this year instead of waiting till next year :evil:

The numbers do not indicate a 79 build. They indicate a model that was introduced in 79. That is how that code system works.
Looking at that plate I would say the car was built in 81 or maybe late 80.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 12, 2010 7:56 pm 
Offline
Moke + Wife = out of the doghouse
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2005 11:41 pm
Posts: 2645
Location: Perth-Western Australia
Ian-Same as mine-AKFPD19Y Date stamp 3/81 :)

_________________
_______________________________________________________________________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 12, 2010 7:56 pm 
Offline
Postally Verbose
Postally Verbose
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 02, 2006 9:12 am
Posts: 19595
Location: Northern NSW
No worries , thank's Morris .

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 12, 2010 9:19 pm 
Offline
1360cc
1360cc
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2004 10:07 pm
Posts: 10654
Location: SE Melbourne
A number of months ago I went and had a look at a late Californian moke that was for sale. Proce was over $20 large, but compared to the ebay car this looked like a bargain!
Owner claimed it to be a barn find from a deceased estate, or something. Real or not, this is what I'd expect for a car being sold as 'original' or 'immaculate'.
:D

Image

Image

Image

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Moke
PostPosted: Tue Jan 12, 2010 10:45 pm 
Offline
848cc
848cc
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 03, 2009 10:21 pm
Posts: 403
Location: Perth
Interesting post this as I've been looking about for a "Californian"for my next car. :D

It's not as easy as you might think. :(

1000 +/- were created in 71-73 for a brief period to be exported to US Virgin Islands (export model but called Californian). All 1275 with drums and rear petrol tank.

Then in 77 they were relaunched again with Californian name. They came with both 998 (77 onwards) and 1275 (78 onwards) engine options. Disks came with the 1275.

In 79 they galvanised the body and essentially called everything a californian. They came with a myriad of options from poverty pack to fully optioned.

So....bloody hard to actually spot what we might think is a real one due to all the options and variants available!

Terry Pollard is President of the Moke club and he can also assist with body numbers if required.

But, you are all correct. The Cooper Tax is alive and well as the Californian Tax. :shock:

p.s. I forgot to mention - I enquired about getting a nuts a bolts restoration one and was quoted...wait for it...$35ks. Still choking.... :D

_________________
Regards,

Mike
"He who dies with the most toys wins."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jan 13, 2010 5:30 am 
Offline
Mods rock!
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 03, 2008 9:02 pm
Posts: 5079
Harley wrote:
A number of months ago I went and had a look at a late Californian moke that was for sale. Proce was over $20 large, but compared to the ebay car this looked like a bargain!
Owner claimed it to be a barn find from a deceased estate, or something. Real or not, this is what I'd expect for a car being sold as 'original' or 'immaculate'.
:D

(Pics as above)



Yeap, that looks about as close as you would expect, down to the original (but dangerous when wet) tyres. Correct heater too for an 81 model. Grill Badge, Pretty good original soft top, seats, horn, radiator, wiper motor, demister ducts, floor matting (but it's been cut away around the base of the steering Column), correct type of Cali Bars front and back, correct type of Sunrasia Rim (there were 2 types fitted to Cali's - early and late), Rear Mud Flaps, Wheel Covers, Exhaust Pipe (what I can see of it), even the HT leads!

What has been changed / removed;-

Steering Wheel (that one is from a 78-79 Califorian),
Emission Controls (air pump etc)

That really is a very fine example. A real credit to the owner. A few years ago you would expect to pay $18 000 to $25 000 for something like that, but in the present market, around $14 000 to $18 000 would be about the right money.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jan 13, 2010 6:34 am 
Offline
998cc
998cc
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 9:18 pm
Posts: 880
Location: Clyde North
I don't mean to try and throw a spanner in the works, but weren't all Mokes exempt from the dreaded air pump? Something about them being a "commercial vehicle" made them exempt? Thought i read that in a TME article. Could be wrong though.

_________________
88 Rover 1.3i "Reggie"
99 Rover 1.3i “Grover”
12 Mini Cooper S "The shitter"
17 Mini Clubman JCW “Noddy”


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jan 13, 2010 7:05 am 
Offline
1275cc
1275cc
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 5:03 pm
Posts: 2729
Location: Out in the shed cleaning up my own mess.
niceboy1275 wrote:
I don't mean to try and throw a spanner in the works, but weren't all Mokes exempt from the dreaded air pump? Something about them being a "commercial vehicle" made them exempt? Thought i read that in a TME article. Could be wrong though.


I must admit I've never seen a Moke with a gulp valve!

_________________
1967 Cooper S - new front bearings to do.
1965 Cooper S shell - Slow progress. No time or money!
1966 Deluxe- next rustoration!
Mk 2 & XJ6 Jags. Less said the better.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Moke
PostPosted: Wed Jan 13, 2010 9:18 am 
Offline
848cc
848cc
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 03, 2009 10:21 pm
Posts: 403
Location: Perth
What is an air pump/gulp valve? Never heard of them... :?

_________________
Regards,

Mike
"He who dies with the most toys wins."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Moke
PostPosted: Wed Jan 13, 2010 9:59 am 
Offline
Moke + Wife = out of the doghouse
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2005 11:41 pm
Posts: 2645
Location: Perth-Western Australia
mtsmini wrote:
What is an air pump/gulp valve? Never heard of them... :?

It was a 70's/80's(piss poor) attempt by the Australian Authorities to stop pollution and what the current Governments call the "Greenhouse" effect :(

_________________
_______________________________________________________________________________
Image


Last edited by LS1380 on Wed Jan 13, 2010 6:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jan 13, 2010 10:17 am 
Offline
1360cc
1360cc
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 03, 2005 1:41 pm
Posts: 12311
Location: Rockingham - Collie WA
Commercial vehicles were exempt from ADR 27a for the first couple of years, but then commercial vehicles had to comply also.

_________________
Too many cars, and too little time.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Moke
PostPosted: Wed Jan 13, 2010 10:41 am 
Offline
1275cc
1275cc
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2004 1:52 pm
Posts: 4434
Location: Melbourne, VIC.
mtsmini wrote:
1000 +/- were created in 71-73 for a brief period to be exported to US Virgin Islands (export model but called Californian). All 1275 with drums and rear petrol tank.


You forgot to add that none (or very few) actually left, as the Virgin Islands order was cancelled. Hence the parts were built up in RHD and sold on the Australian market as the first Californians. IMHO the best of all Mokes.

_________________
Brett Nicholson
Greendale (near Ballan) VIC.
1971 Morris Mini Moke
1966 Austin Mini
1965 Morris Mini Traveller
1973 LR Series 3 88
2007 LR Freelander 2


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Mokes
PostPosted: Wed Jan 13, 2010 10:52 am 
Offline
848cc
848cc
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 03, 2009 10:21 pm
Posts: 403
Location: Perth
Would you mind expanding on your opinion on why they are best? It might help me to narrow search.

Body was not galvanised.
Rear tank rather than side tank.
Seats?

_________________
Regards,

Mike
"He who dies with the most toys wins."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mokes
PostPosted: Wed Jan 13, 2010 11:06 am 
Offline
1098cc
1098cc
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2009 11:28 pm
Posts: 1550
The pre october 79 were not galvanised, and all to often rusted to pieces... So keep a wide eye open for cancer.

The advantage to a pre gal moke is that the parts are ALL interchanable,,, every bit of it. The Gal bodies, well they aren't as much, they have a lot of different parts on them.

The rear tank is a Bug Eyed Sprite tank out of and A/H... I reckon it would be cool it you could put one of those in AND a side tank,, you could drive half way across the country in any direction :mrgreen:
.
.
..
The only downer with the early models is RUST,, especially if its from a coastal area, you can garantee that some yuppy has had the romantic idea of driving it thru the sand at the beach at least once :roll: (once if your lucky!!)

Apart from the rust, I reckon that the the advantage with parts availablity is a huge bonus.

But, look, you don't need to buy a genuine cali,, they cost more, and you could easily get the cali parts you like and fit them to a base model... almost everyone has done it.

Growing up I have seen probably 500-600 mokes, and about 400 realy up close and personal.. and of them, only about 6 were really genuine ridgy didge. Its almost safe to say, that the most of the time, the difference between a cali and base model is ONLY the body number... everything else you can buy for them.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 81 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 94 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

© 2016 Ausmini. All garage work involves equal measures of enthusiasm, ingenuity and a fair degree of irresponsibility.