Ausmini
It is currently Wed Jul 23, 2025 8:41 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 21 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Hydro Suspension.
PostPosted: Tue Apr 18, 2006 1:31 pm 
Offline
998cc
998cc
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 21, 2006 10:03 am
Posts: 734
Location: Melbourne, Craigieburn
I'm currenly considering buying a 1970 k1100 with hyro.

I've heard conflicting arguments about this type of syspension.

Is it better or worse than rubber cone???

_________________
Santo
Image
"The Lone Ranger"
HI-HO Silver......AWAAAAAY!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Apr 18, 2006 1:45 pm 
Offline
1275cc
1275cc
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 18, 2004 1:33 pm
Posts: 2213
Location: Darling Downs QLD
Better!

Hydro rides a lot smoother,

Hydro handles a lot better,

What more could you want?

Of course IF something goes wrong it is more $ to fix, BUT I reckon it is worth it. (Things dont go wrong anywhere near as often as the rubber fetishists would have you believe)!!

I recommend comp bumpstops on the rear, and shocks on the front!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Apr 18, 2006 1:55 pm 
Offline
1275cc
1275cc
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 18, 2004 1:33 pm
Posts: 2213
Location: Darling Downs QLD
With this type of question it may be wiser to narrow it down a bit. What are you after out of the mini? What will it be used for? Do you want a numb ass?

That kind of thing :lol: :lol: :lol: :wink:


Seriously, is it a budget runabout, is it a resto, is it a show car, is it a daily driver for you or your kids?

What money do you want to spend?

Would you retain stock suspension if you had a rubber cone car?

Then after you've asked the questions,

Buy

the

hydro

clubbie
8) 8)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Apr 18, 2006 3:37 pm 
Offline
998cc
998cc
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 21, 2006 10:03 am
Posts: 734
Location: Melbourne, Craigieburn
ok...

It won't be a daily driver now, but in the future it may.
The car in question is a 1970 Morris k1100 with a 1310cc in it, 4 wheel disks, twin tanks and hydro.

He describes it as "handles like its on rails"...
I just want a car that goes resonably well and corners extremely well.

If the hydro will cut it in the handling department then i will no doubt try to buy it.
If rubber cone is better i'll go for a clubman.

_________________
Santo
Image
"The Lone Ranger"
HI-HO Silver......AWAAAAAY!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Apr 18, 2006 3:56 pm 
Offline
1360cc
1360cc
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 01, 2004 3:41 pm
Posts: 6858
Location: Special Tuning Sydney
I concur with Matt. Hydrp goes as good as any dry or better!

All Mk2 Cooper S's came with Hydro so what does that say?

All you need is competition bump stops in the back, attach shocks to the front and she will handle like she's on rails 8) After that is set up and the hydro is pumped up correctly, your weakest link will be tyres...

Dry cars tend to be "bouncier", hydro is cheaper to setup as per above. The performance increase (or decrease!!! ) of conversion to dry suspension is no way near worthy of the price involved compared to staying with wet. Just buy more hydro bags as backup 8)

_________________
Lillee - 1969 Morris Mini K


Last edited by Lillee on Wed Apr 19, 2006 8:41 am, edited 3 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Apr 18, 2006 3:58 pm 
Offline
NAV-MAN
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 18, 2004 1:50 am
Posts: 1672
Location: Nothern Brisvegas
My van is on rubber cones and is used daily and no worries for me.
I have also been in a cooper s on hydro and it is much smoother. There is a reason why they advertised it as floats on fluid.
Handling wise there really isn't that much in it in stock form.
My deluxe is hydro and will remain wet due to my liking of hydro and a few tweaks that can be made to make it handle much better

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Apr 18, 2006 4:13 pm 
Offline
998cc
998cc
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2004 2:41 pm
Posts: 1145
Location: ACT
Mr Brother, this discussion is as divisive (and as old) as the clubman Vs Roundnose preference. My Clubbie was Hydro and in doing the conversion I converted to dry cone out of preference. I didn't buy a mini for a soft ride. But as with anything stated here it is all personal preference.

I have had one hydro car and two conies and I personally think there is nothing really to differentiate once once additional suspension components are added. The hydro is probably a little more comfortable but I find my cone car pretty pliant anyway.

Cheers

Matt

_________________
225hp atw on 14psi. 1/4 Mile no idea. Take one 1971 Mini Clubman, one Starlet GT Halfcut, Simmer over a warm MIG Welder, and Voila Minstar! www.mpdesign.id.au
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Apr 18, 2006 5:30 pm 
Offline
1275cc
1275cc
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 18, 2004 1:33 pm
Posts: 2213
Location: Darling Downs QLD
Sounds like a nice car to me!

To get the best from the hydro you really should spend a little:

$80 or so for rear bump stops, and $200 or so for front shocks (and brackets)

Makes a world of difference. If you want handling, that setup gives it to you, as 68deluxe said, tyres next 8) 8)

Then go for adjustable lower arms and tie rods...

Mmm... 8)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Apr 18, 2006 10:07 pm 
Offline
848cc
848cc
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2005 4:17 pm
Posts: 372
Location: Melbourne, Australia
I got hydro and I think its a little worn. Go over a bump and it bounces a few times before setteling.

I'm no race driver but I reckon it corners pretty well

With shocks up the front, do they work with the hydro or replace it? I thought hydro pumped fluid from front to back (and vice versa) to keep the car fairly level.

Also lowering with hydro? how do you do that? different sized bags or fluid level?

And those springs in the rear, are they a joke?

I noticed that doing a CV joint it was quite difficult to get the hubs out of the way of the control arms as the hydro was real hard to push against with just the front in the air. A 3ft pri-bar got it done though.

(maybe I should read a bit on how hydro works huh)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 19, 2006 12:25 am 
Offline
Yay For Hay!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2004 9:27 pm
Posts: 15912
Location: Wodonga - Vic/NSW border
Joe wrote:
Also lowering with hydro? how do you do that? different sized bags or fluid level?
put less fluid in the system, but that tends to make them squirm around more. I reckon it would be possible to put shorter shafts in the rear to make the back lower with the same pressure, which would drop the front too

And those springs in the rear, are they a joke?
they work in the opposite direction to normal car springs, they pull the back wheels up to counteract the extra pressure on the front wheels with all the weight of the motor...


I noticed that doing a CV joint it was quite difficult to get the hubs out of the way of the control arms as the hydro was real hard to push against with just the front in the air. A 3ft pri-bar got it done though.
when doing stuff like that, jack up the back of the car as well so the fluid isn't all being pushed to the front by the whole weight of the car being on the back suspension



;)

I run my hydro S at the standard ride height, I recently put on longer front arms to counter the stock positive camber, and progressive bump stops at the back, it's great :)

_________________
did I tell you that I won a trophy?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 19, 2006 8:56 am 
Offline
1360cc
1360cc
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 01, 2004 3:41 pm
Posts: 6858
Location: Special Tuning Sydney
RE: shocks with hydro at the front

Basically the shocks just reduces the lean at the front end when going around corners. Overall effect is to stiffen up and stabilise the front end, the shocks don't do much work when installed on hydro car but make a world of difference to handling. It's less squirmier through the corners.

RE: lowering hydro

IMO it's not needed. The worste way to do it is by reducing fluid in the hydro system. Even any other type of lowering screws up the geometry of the car. All i know is when my car was lower, it handled pretty bad. The hydro should be pumped so that the wheels sit 3 fingers from front guard. IMO lowering hydro makes bugger all difference to handling and in fact makes it alot worste. It just "looks good" but honestly I think a lowered mini looks crap :? they look way too dumpy lowered if you don't have big 13inch wheels which is another story altogether :P

Besides, minis are low as it is. Don't follow the ricer crowd :wink:

Just set it up like this:

Competition bump stops in the rear, ~$75 from karcraft. Go to pick n payless and get any front clubman shock brackets along with the shocks. Don't need fancy shocks, just standards as they do bugger all work in the front. Once all this is installed, flush the hydro system and pump it up to 3 fingers at the front. Take it for a fang and if your tyres squeel at 80km/h around the corners, time to save for real Yoko rubber :wink:

Honestly any faster and you will need racing slicks to keep the car on the road through corners as that will be the weakest link in the suspension. You may also need to think about bucket seats as you will fall off the standard mini seat around corners :lol: I've had mine set up this way for 2 years with crappy tyres and still have been very satisfied indeed 8)

_________________
Lillee - 1969 Morris Mini K


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 19, 2006 9:02 am 
Offline
1275cc
1275cc
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 18, 2004 1:33 pm
Posts: 2213
Location: Darling Downs QLD
As above!!

The front shocks help to reduce the pitchiness and bouncing sometimes present. They act as dampers.

The best to get are oil filled, not gas filled. You want them to resist movement both ways (up and down) for the best effect.

Enjoy the hydro


Once youve had hydro..... 8)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 19, 2006 9:39 am 
Offline
SooperDooperMiniCooper ExpertEngineering
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 29, 2005 9:46 am
Posts: 18887
Location: Under the bonnet son!
Orright,

I own a hydro car and like the way it works, but worry about how much it may cost to repair a burst bag in 10 years time. They're expensive now, what do you reckon they might cost then?

Mick

_________________
SooperDooperMiniCooperExpertEngineering

All garage work involves equal measures of enthusiasm, ingenuity and a fair degree of irresponsibility.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 19, 2006 10:01 am 
Offline
998cc
998cc
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2005 9:16 pm
Posts: 714
Location: Gold Coast
68Delux wrote:
All Mk2 Cooper S's came with Hydro so what does that say?


well said i have had both first dry now have a 71 cluby with wet and its great just recently had the stopper replaced and the bags adjusted ride hight is good and smooth

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 19, 2006 12:05 pm 
Offline
998cc
998cc
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 21, 2006 10:03 am
Posts: 734
Location: Melbourne, Craigieburn
Mick wrote:
Orright,

I own a hydro car and like the way it works, but worry about how much it may cost to repair a burst bag in 10 years time. They're expensive now, what do you reckon they might cost then?

Mick


Good question.

Are they still available in quantity? Do they still make them in the UK?

Or will it be like Mad Max... (Kill people over for them!)

_________________
Santo
Image
"The Lone Ranger"
HI-HO Silver......AWAAAAAY!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 21 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: ken@miniauto and 86 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

© 2016 Ausmini. All garage work involves equal measures of enthusiasm, ingenuity and a fair degree of irresponsibility.