Ausmini
It is currently Sat Jul 19, 2025 6:14 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Remote?? Rodchange??
PostPosted: Thu Apr 20, 2006 9:21 am 
Offline
848cc
848cc
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2005 1:11 pm
Posts: 271
Location: Melbourne
Whats the difference between them??? :oops:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 20, 2006 9:36 am 
Offline
Postally Verbose
Postally Verbose
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 02, 2006 9:12 am
Posts: 19595
Location: Northern NSW
the rod change box has a single rod that runs from the gear shifter to the gearbox and a bracing rod as well to stiffen things up , the remote has an aluminium housing that extends from the gearbox to incorporate the gear lever hole . Remote is more of a rigid mounting and stabilises things better , apart from that you've possibly opened a can of worms as preferences are like the clubbie/roundie debate as to which is better .....

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 20, 2006 9:45 am 
Offline
848cc
848cc
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2005 1:11 pm
Posts: 271
Location: Melbourne
Thanks for that, one more thing. Are they interchangable? If i have a rod change at the moment, can i buy a remote typ and bolt it on.....Let me guess, not that easy.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 20, 2006 10:08 am 
Offline
998cc
998cc
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2006 9:11 pm
Posts: 1016
Location: SYDNEY
gearbox housing is totally different, so the short answer is NO.

_________________
Website: www.justanothermini.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 20, 2006 1:13 pm 
Offline
998cc
998cc
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 7:20 pm
Posts: 833
Location: WAGGA
I was tossing up which way to go with my van because I have two rod and two remote change boxes here.

I have decided on the remote change because I think my housing came up nice and shiny after a degrease. Not that it will last... but hey.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 20, 2006 2:35 pm 
Offline
1275cc
1275cc
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 8:54 pm
Posts: 2010
Location: Greenhill, SA
Remote 'boxes are typically better... The mount at the back of the shifter acts as an excellent engine steady. However, selectors and bits are harder to find second hand and cost more $ new than rod-type.

Alot of people like the shift feel of a remote 'box, but my LS has only done 100,000kms, so it still feels nice. Usually the shifter mechanism on the rod boxes wears out and they feel like stirring a bowl full of custard.

_________________
Cheap, Fast, Reliable. Choose two.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 20, 2006 2:44 pm 
Offline
1360cc
1360cc

Joined: Mon Nov 01, 2004 4:36 pm
Posts: 7673
the rod change is easier to remove, and lighter, does feel like crap when worn out but you can't accidentally select reverse and all the rod change gearboxes have synchro on first and the pot joints are incredibly more easy to remove/install when removing or reinstalling an engine, and they don't wear like the previous uni joints.
basically its the more modern technically better setup.

the remote change makes getting the engine out the top of the car a real pain in the arse,
and they rattle like all hell when worn but they called it a "racing style gearchange" for a reason, as it has a firm feel with a short throw which most of us prefer.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 103 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

© 2016 Ausmini. All garage work involves equal measures of enthusiasm, ingenuity and a fair degree of irresponsibility.