Harley wrote:
drmini in aust wrote:
Pot joints ones last longer than either the rubber joints or the S Hardy Spicers..
So what's so special about the rubber joints or spicers that make some people swear by them? Less friction for more power?

In the beginning, Issigonis and his mate Alex Moulton created the rubber U/J. And it was good. But if oilz got on it or people overtightened it, it carked it. But really it wasn't bad, the Morris 1100 used them too.
When the Cooper S started getting serious power for competition in the mid 60s the rubber joints were inadequate. BMC dug into the parts bin, voila! Hardy Spicer U'Js (actually, they are identical to a 1920s Austin 7 tailshaft one, even the spline is the same).
These were used on Cooper S, MiniMatic, Morris 1100S/1300, and Oz Clubman GT. Yes they are stronger. But they don't last forever, although pretty easy to change.
Pot joint is pretty much a CV, with parallel tracks so the shaft can plunge in and out. They last for ages, as long as the grease stays in.
As for power, a pot joint will have less losses.
_________________
DrMini- 1970 wasaMatic 1360, Mk1S crank, 86.6HP (ATW) =~125 @ crank, 45 Dellorto (38 chokes), RE282 sprint cam, 1.5 rockers, 11.0:1 C/R.
