ausmini https://www.ausmini.com/forums/ |
|
Odd MkII S compliance plate https://www.ausmini.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=28820 |
Page 1 of 3 |
Author: | PetenSoaf [ Sun Mar 04, 2007 6:08 pm ] |
Post subject: | Odd MkII S compliance plate |
Is this correct? A known genuine MkII Cooper S had this compliance plate fitted to it: ![]() I thought a car like this should have had one of the larger square plates? |
Author: | drmini in aust [ Sun Mar 04, 2007 6:13 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
That is like mine, (dated 3/70) except numbers different. I think the plates were made bigger a few years later so they could fit all the ADR numbers in. ![]() |
Author: | Morris 1100 [ Sun Mar 04, 2007 6:14 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Interesting... Maybe it had a replacement plate fitted. ![]() That style of plate is the same as the 76 Mini S plate that I have. I don't know when that plate was first fitted. A lot of new Ford get new tags because they are stickers! ![]() |
Author: | PetenSoaf [ Sun Mar 04, 2007 6:17 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
drmini in aust wrote: That is like mine, (dated 3/70) except numbers different.
I think the plates were made bigger a few years later so they could fit all the ADR numbers in. ![]() But weren't MkII S plates, right from compliance plate introduction, the larger size? The plate I've pictured above is similar (in size at least) to those fitted to Clubmans and Mokes. . . |
Author: | Morris 1100 [ Sun Mar 04, 2007 6:22 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
The early plates were big but all the later plates were smaller. I don't think that there would be any difference between the normal Mini and the Cooper S. So if the doc has another small plate on a similar date car you could assume that they changed in 70. |
Author: | poeee [ Sun Mar 04, 2007 6:35 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
My early 70 van has the big square one. Would assume they changed 1/2 way through the year. Would be good to see early Clubman ones, too. Anton aka GT, can you help with what a GT plate looks like? |
Author: | drmini in aust [ Sun Mar 04, 2007 6:40 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Morris 1100 wrote: The early plates were big but all the later plates were smaller. I don't think that there would be any difference between the normal Mini and the Cooper S.
So if the doc has another small plate on a similar date car you could assume that they changed in 70. OOPs sorry, mine does have the big square one, my bad. ![]() It's hidden behind the `matic heater, hard to see... ![]() |
Author: | Morris 1100 [ Sun Mar 04, 2007 6:43 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
poeee wrote: My early 70 van has the big square one. Would assume they changed 1/2 way through the year. Would be good to see early Clubman ones, too. Anton aka GT, can you help with what a GT plate looks like? He also has a 71 Clubman for sale so that plate may help as well. ![]() |
Author: | PetenSoaf [ Sun Mar 04, 2007 6:44 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Have seen a very early GT here in WA - and it had the 'normal' small Clubman compliance plate. Looks like they must have changed sometime around December '70. Our November '70 MkII S had (can only see the rivet holes) a larger square plate. . . |
Author: | justminis [ Sun Mar 04, 2007 6:48 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
I have a 11/70 Mk 2 S with the big plate, also a 12/70 K that has the big plate too. Perhaps yours is a replacement? |
Author: | PetenSoaf [ Sun Mar 04, 2007 6:53 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
justminis wrote: I have a 11/70 Mk 2 S with the big plate, also a 12/70 K that has the big plate too. Perhaps yours is a replacement?
Possibly - although there are only two rivet holes in the body where the plate is fitted (down behind the brake booster). It doesn't look as though one of the larger, 4-rivet plates has ever been fitted. |
Author: | Morris 1100 [ Sun Mar 04, 2007 7:12 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Here are two later plates for comparison... ![]() ![]() |
Author: | mr moke [ Sun Mar 04, 2007 7:40 pm ] |
Post subject: | id tag |
hi pete i think i've got the the same size plate at home it is of a 1970 also i'll have alook on wednesday when i get home. ![]() |
Author: | Morris 1100 [ Sun Mar 04, 2007 7:47 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Oooh I just noticed an important difference between.... ![]() and ![]() Notice that the word British is missing from the second one. |
Author: | drmini in aust [ Sun Mar 04, 2007 7:58 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
And why is the 1st one reverse stamped as usual, and not the 2nd? Stamps wear out?? ![]() |
Page 1 of 3 | All times are UTC + 10 hours |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |