Ausmini
It is currently Wed Aug 20, 2025 10:09 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 40 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Apr 20, 2007 7:34 pm 
Offline
998cc
998cc
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 28, 2006 7:30 pm
Posts: 1184
Location: ASQUITH NSW, Engine size:1310
hey
the demand for an injected induction is pretty big right, so many poeple have said to me "dont bother with the SPI injection setup(90's mini), its crap and couldn't pull a hat off my head".

no one has exsplained why :?

_________________
any parts for a 76 clubby pm me or ring 0405 329 326

http://www.ausmini.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=44717


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 20, 2007 7:47 pm 
Offline
1360cc
1360cc
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2004 10:07 pm
Posts: 10654
Location: SE Melbourne
Simple.

Carb:
More fuel + more air = more power.

SPI:

Computer restricts fuel levels for emissions, + limited air = less power, but torquey and smooth. :D


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 20, 2007 7:50 pm 
Offline
religious status
religious status
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 6:19 pm
Posts: 39764
Location: near Baulkham Hills, NSW
Well, the SPI was invented so the UK Mini 1275 could pass the emission rules of the day.
Power was 61 or 63 HP I think, about the same as an old single carb 1275.
Nothing special. By comparison, an MG Metro with carb was 72HP.... :wink:
<edit> when the MPI came out, it was not much better than SPI in stock form.

_________________
DrMini- 1970 wasaMatic 1360, Mk1S crank, 86.6HP (ATW) =~125 @ crank, 45 Dellorto (38 chokes), RE282 sprint cam, 1.5 rockers, 11.0:1 C/R. :mrgreen:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 20, 2007 8:30 pm 
Offline
998cc
998cc
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 28, 2006 7:30 pm
Posts: 1184
Location: ASQUITH NSW, Engine size:1310
in what way does it restrict the flow, is it the size of the injector, or the fact that there is regulator that sends the fuel back to the tank, if so whats stopping you from removing it completly or swapping it from another car,

what stops it, in alot of other cars its avoidable

_________________
any parts for a 76 clubby pm me or ring 0405 329 326

http://www.ausmini.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=44717


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 20, 2007 8:36 pm 
Offline
1360cc
1360cc
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2004 10:07 pm
Posts: 10654
Location: SE Melbourne
Okay, so my answer is too simple......prolly even wrong. :D

The main restriction comes from the head design. There is one inlet for two cylinders. One cylinder will always get slightly more fuel than another, but with the carb there so much going everywhere it doesnt really matter. A lot is 'wasted' (is that the word?)

Other restrictions:
The single injector can only deliver so much fuel.
Air changes angle in manifold
Engine capacity
Cat exhaust
Compression ratio

Lots of things really. Just like any other car.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 20, 2007 8:41 pm 
Offline
998cc
998cc
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 28, 2006 7:30 pm
Posts: 1184
Location: ASQUITH NSW, Engine size:1310
when you say injector, do you mean it had 4 inj or 2 because that would make it a bit better,

and no one has stuck the set up on a another motor?

_________________
any parts for a 76 clubby pm me or ring 0405 329 326

http://www.ausmini.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=44717


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 20, 2007 8:44 pm 
Offline
religious status
religious status
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 6:19 pm
Posts: 39764
Location: near Baulkham Hills, NSW
It's bloody hard to make port injection work properly when you only have 2 intake ports. The breathing through each port is not symetrical.
The firing order is 1-3-4-2. Displace it 1 stroke > for clarity, it is 3-4-2-1. So 3 sucks then 4, then that port rests while 2 and then 1 suck on the other port.
Also, the inlet timing overlaps, at a point both cylinders are sucking on the same port together.

If you are serious about MPI, go buy an 8 port head for starters. :wink:

_________________
DrMini- 1970 wasaMatic 1360, Mk1S crank, 86.6HP (ATW) =~125 @ crank, 45 Dellorto (38 chokes), RE282 sprint cam, 1.5 rockers, 11.0:1 C/R. :mrgreen:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 20, 2007 8:47 pm 
Offline
1360cc
1360cc
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2004 10:07 pm
Posts: 10654
Location: SE Melbourne
Simply put......the head is the restriction.
Check out what the miniman gets on a relatively 'stock' engine with a twin cam head on it.
:D


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 20, 2007 8:58 pm 
Offline
998cc
998cc
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 28, 2006 7:30 pm
Posts: 1184
Location: ASQUITH NSW, Engine size:1310
drmini in aust wrote:
It's bloody hard to make port injection work properly when you only have 2 intake ports. The breathing through each port is not symetrical.
The firing order is 1-3-4-2. Displace it 1 stroke > for clarity, it is 3-4-2-1. So 3 sucks then 4, then that port rests while 2 and then 1 suck on the other port.
Also, the inlet timing overlaps, at a point both cylinders are sucking on the same port together.

If you are serious about MPI, go buy an 8 port head for starters. :wink:


i gathered that from the start, thats why ive gone a dual thoat carby at the moment, the reason why i was asking is with the turbo setup i am going to use i need a dual throat carby or inj, i hate SU and webber, dello or inj is the only other options, i was talking to a carby builder today and he said that webbers and dello don't really like being force fed, he said that i would have to put a valve in to make sure the carby does nt back fire through its self,

i haven't got $ for an 8 porta,

_________________
any parts for a 76 clubby pm me or ring 0405 329 326

http://www.ausmini.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=44717


Last edited by buztoy on Sat Apr 21, 2007 10:07 am, edited 2 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 20, 2007 9:32 pm 
Offline
848cc
848cc
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2005 4:17 pm
Posts: 372
Location: Melbourne, Australia
but even still with the twin port head, an injector should be able to flow as much as a carby with less restriction. A vacuum variable venturi carburettor (su) will always be a restriction. You could put bigger injectors, reg, pump, etc... But in England many smart men have been trying to make power out of the cpi/tpi minis and it seems they all hit a brick wall trying to make easy ECU upgrades (unichips etc...) to modify the fuel map. Its all about injector time and injector timing (there is a difference).

And at the end of the day, without forcing the air in there, you can only run at 100% volumetric efficiency and if a webber or SUs etc can provide that for you... why spend mid to high 4 figure numbers, when with carbys, low 4 figure numbers can get you the same result.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 20, 2007 9:39 pm 
Offline
848cc
848cc
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2005 4:17 pm
Posts: 372
Location: Melbourne, Australia
would a turbo fit into the end of a webber? they don't look like they have much room there in the webber box

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: here we go again
PostPosted: Sat Apr 21, 2007 1:14 am 
Offline
1275cc
1275cc
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 08, 2006 9:34 pm
Posts: 2372
Location: Adelaide
did you say bimmer twinky? :roll: here we go again

_________________
blokeinamoke wrote:
Yep Mokes are ugly - but Moke owners know that. Its like ugly women - she may be a dog but you know your going to get some :wink:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 21, 2007 1:53 am 
Offline
998cc
998cc
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 18, 2006 4:57 am
Posts: 515
Location: Hamburg, Germany
if you say injection can not make more power you know only part of the story.

first of all the injection set up can make much more power by its own, the throttlebody is also found in Rover K engines with up to 90HP, only with a bigger injector.
the mini injection engine itself is build to give 63 HP, with a camshaft that delivers 60HP in carb version ( Rover Metro). if you change the cam and the head you can get more than 80HP without problems, and that is still with small valves.
if you fit bigger valves, like the MG Metro, you get even more, but will run out of fuel if you don't change the injector

and i know it, i'm driving this kind of engine :wink:

_________________
Rover 214 atm ....


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 21, 2007 1:54 am 
Offline
1360cc
1360cc

Joined: Mon Nov 01, 2004 4:36 pm
Posts: 7673
i think the injected minis have a bit more power vs the same engine with a carb, however they have limited tuning options.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 21, 2007 10:04 am 
Offline
998cc
998cc
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 28, 2006 7:30 pm
Posts: 1184
Location: ASQUITH NSW, Engine size:1310
Joe wrote:
would a turbo fit into the end of a webber? they don't look like they have much room there in the webber box


it either im going a suck through carby or a blow through, in which case if its going to be blow im going to stick where the oil breather is at about 11 oclock coming from the center

_________________
any parts for a 76 clubby pm me or ring 0405 329 326

http://www.ausmini.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=44717


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 40 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 177 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

© 2016 Ausmini. All garage work involves equal measures of enthusiasm, ingenuity and a fair degree of irresponsibility.