ausmini https://www.ausmini.com/forums/ |
|
engine internals https://www.ausmini.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=3889 |
Page 1 of 1 |
Author: | Gezo [ Sun Jan 09, 2005 2:29 pm ] |
Post subject: | engine internals |
Hi, Does anybody know if an 1100S short journal crank and internals will bolt straight into a Mk1 Cooper S block. Thanks |
Author: | brickworx [ Sun Jan 09, 2005 6:13 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Yes will fit but will have to play around with thrust washers, and end float |
Author: | drmini in aust [ Sun Jan 09, 2005 6:20 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
brickworx wrote: Yes will fit but will have to play around with thrust washers, and end float
You can get std, +.003" and +.030" thrusts. But the +.030" are NLA according to many sources, including Karcraft. Vandervell stopped making them. If you got 'em, hoard 'em! ![]() ![]() |
Author: | Gezo [ Sun Jan 09, 2005 8:38 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Hi, Thanks for your knowledge. |
Author: | Gezo [ Mon Jan 24, 2005 7:58 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Do the 1100S crank and internals also fit inside the Mark 2 Cooper S block? Thanks Again |
Author: | drmini in aust [ Mon Jan 24, 2005 8:06 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Yes. Mk1 & Mk2 S main journal widths are the same, so the above applies. The opposite applies too. I run a Mk2 S crank & rods in an 1100S block. Again, just need to play with the thrust washer thicknesses to get the end float right.. ![]() |
Author: | Gezo [ Mon Jan 24, 2005 8:13 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Thanks Dr again |
Author: | 1380 yellow devil [ Tue Jan 25, 2005 9:00 am ] |
Post subject: | |
drmini in aust wrote: Yes. Mk1 & Mk2 S main journal widths are the same, so the above applies.
The opposite applies too. I run a Mk2 S crank & rods in an 1100S block. Again, just need to play with the thrust washer thicknesses to get the end float right.. ![]() Thats good to know I wil do that with my Next Motor. ![]() |
Author: | BLACKRZ_667 [ Wed Jan 26, 2005 4:38 pm ] |
Post subject: | ??????? |
Hey Guys I was just wondering what i should do to my mini clubman that will make it preform better and what price i would be looking at thanks |
Author: | Gezo [ Fri Feb 04, 2005 9:05 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Hi, Another crank question. I was reading an old mini magazine and it said, If you use a LS1275 big journal crank (1.75 big ends), offset machine the big ends down to 1.625 diameter use this in a Cooper S block you will get an 1/8 of a stroke. Does this simply mean you just grind your LS crank down to 1.625 on the big ends and put it in a Cooper S block and you get an 1/8 stroke. Thanks |
Author: | drmini in aust [ Fri Feb 04, 2005 1:36 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Gezo wrote: Hi,
Another crank question. I was reading an old mini magazine and it said, If you use a LS1275 big journal crank (1.75 big ends), offset machine the big ends down to 1.625 diameter use this in a Cooper S block you will get an 1/8 of a stroke. Does this simply mean you just grind your LS crank down to 1.625 on the big ends and put it in a Cooper S block and you get an 1/8 stroke. Thanks You need to offset grind the big ends to 1.625". This means they are set up in the grinder to take 99% of this metal off the inside of the pin, and bugger all off the outside. This moves the reground pin's stroke radius outwards. Then you use S rods, but they are too wide and must be narrowed to fit. And the pistons will now stick out of the block. So you need to get `stroker' pistons with a shorter pin to crown height. Sometimes you can machine the piston top of stock pistons, if thick enough. Not always. Whether a 1275S block or later 1275 block doesn't matter. They are pretty much the same deck height. |
Author: | Gezo [ Fri Feb 04, 2005 10:23 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Thanks again Dr. Is this worth doing, and what sort of power gain is there. Thanks |
Author: | drmini in aust [ Sat Feb 05, 2005 6:04 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Gezo wrote: Thanks again Dr.
Is this worth doing, and what sort of power gain is there. Thanks You do gain torque, but I think it reduces revability. Crank is a bit more `whippy' than stock due to the extra stroke.. I'm tossing up now whether to bore my auto block to 1360, or stroke it to 1405. ![]() I'll probably stay at 1360, I've got Hypatec pistons already. ![]() |
Author: | 1310/71 [ Sat Feb 05, 2005 11:11 am ] |
Post subject: | |
drmini in aust wrote: Gezo wrote: Thanks again Dr. Is this worth doing, and what sort of power gain is there. Thanks You do gain torque, but I think it reduces revability. Crank is a bit more `whippy' than stock due to the extra stroke.. I'm tossing up now whether to bore my auto block to 1360, or stroke it to 1405. ![]() I'll probably stay at 1360, I've got Hypatec pistons already. ![]() Careful Doc - you're giving away a few Wakefield Park secrets there. Now the guys will know what you have up your sleeve ![]() ![]() |
Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC + 10 hours |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |