Ausmini
It is currently Thu Aug 14, 2025 8:12 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 15 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Engine dilemma
PostPosted: Sun Apr 19, 2009 10:50 pm 
Offline
848cc
848cc

Joined: Sun May 09, 2004 6:12 pm
Posts: 267
Location: Adelaide
I've been given a 1100 engine which I'm going to rebuild to replace my current one.40 thous over currently.
I was going to aim for a CR of around 10.1 so I was trying to work out what pistons (60 thou) to go with - dished or flat top.I have a '295 head on my current engine which had been reconditioned when I bought it so I was going to look at using that.That was until I measured it and its had 120 thou taken off it.I guess to get the compression up but 120 thou sounds a bit too much to trust.
It hasn't blown the head gasket in the couple of years I've had it on so do I go with it or look for another head.It would be a shame to waste it but even more of a shame to put pistons in to suit then have to change it all.
I've got a few months to decide as I'll be doing the gearbox first.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 20, 2009 9:22 am 
Offline
This space for rent
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2007 12:40 pm
Posts: 5455
Location: Melbourne
At 120 thou off, that head is really thin. 90-100 is about the accepted maximum safe shave, I'm surprised you could get 120 off it without breaking into the rocker oil drilling.

Anyway, unless the chambers have been opened up significantly (which is not really necessary on a '295 as they're pretty damn good to start with) you'll need to run dished pistons to keep the CR under control. At 60 thou over and with a 6cc dished piston you're looking at nearly 11:1 static CR, put flat tops in and it's 13.5:1 :shock:

First thing I'd be doing with that head is cc'ing the chambers to see if they're standard. It's unlikely you're going to be able to do much with it unless they're enlarged.

Good luck with it, I'm interested to know how you get on :)

_________________
Simon

The adventures of an owner builder in the Tallarook Ranges

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 20, 2009 2:10 pm 
Offline
1098cc
1098cc
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 29, 2009 10:46 pm
Posts: 1305
Location: Outback Mini Man
Lucky you got a 295, slightly better than a 202 which is the common use head.

Dont use flat top pistons if you intend to drive it daily, the dished pistons are dished for a reason, to help with a centred combustion. Not to mention keeping your compression ratio's down a little as mentioned in the previous post.

_________________
Aussie Leyland, Aussie Factory, Aussie Mini S.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 20, 2009 3:12 pm 
Offline
848cc
848cc

Joined: Sun May 09, 2004 6:12 pm
Posts: 267
Location: Adelaide
sgc wrote:
At 120 thou off, that head is really thin. 90-100 is about the accepted maximum safe shave, I'm surprised you could get 120 off it without breaking into the rocker oil drilling.


Unless I've measured wrong it is that much and I have compared with a standard head.
Maybe I've got lucky so far but will that hold.Also whats the chances of the valves hitting the block.I know it does have oversized valves.


sgc wrote:
you'll need to run dished pistons to keep the CR under control. At 60 thou over and with a 6cc dished piston you're looking at nearly 11:1 static CR, put flat tops in and it's 13.5:1 :shock:


I thought it was lower than that.I probably need to go through some calculations again.
BTW whats the dish cc on the Hypatecs?


sgc wrote:
First thing I'd be doing with that head is cc'ing the chambers to see if they're standard. It's unlikely you're going to be able to do much with it unless they're enlarged.

Good luck with it, I'm interested to know how you get on :)


I will cc it all this time.At the moment I'm starting to slowly get everything I need together and I'm trying to work out if I need to factor in another head.
I know that it had had new valves, valve guides, springs and inserts done.I was told who the work was done by and I'm suprised that they would take so much off it.
I'll just put it down to the learning experience if I have to get another.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 20, 2009 3:53 pm 
Offline
the King of Bling
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 03, 2004 11:11 pm
Posts: 19858
Location: Baulkham Hills
Drekkus wrote:
sgc wrote:
At 120 thou off, that head is really thin. 90-100 is about the accepted maximum safe shave, I'm surprised you could get 120 off it without breaking into the rocker oil drilling.


Unless I've measured wrong it is that much and I have compared with a standard head.
Maybe I've got lucky so far but will that hold.Also whats the chances of the valves hitting the block.I know it does have oversized valves.



What head did you compare it to...Another 295 Head :idea:

_________________
Stop Licking the Dog...I Don't Care Who Started It


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 20, 2009 3:59 pm 
Offline
This space for rent
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2007 12:40 pm
Posts: 5455
Location: Melbourne
Drekkus wrote:
whats the chances of the valves hitting the block.I know it does have oversized valves.


The valves in a '295 won't hit the block in an 1100 regardless of oversize. With a really thin head such as yours there might be a risk of the valves hitting pistons but only if you're running a high-lift cam or 1.5:1 rockers.

Drekkus wrote:
I thought it was lower than that.I probably need to go through some calculations again.
BTW whats the dish cc on the Hypatecs?


My spreadsheet says:
(2.543"+0.060" bore) x 3.296" stroke = 287.4cc swept volume per cylinder

28.3cc std chamber vol - 0.120" skim = approx 18.3cc <--- [edit] I think this might be a little out since the chamber's not a perfect cylinder..

18.3cc chamber + 6.0cc piston dish + 3.5cc gasket vol + maybe 1cc piston-deck, ring land, etc = 28.8cc total combustion chamber volume

Therefore

(287.4cc + 28.8cc) / 28.8cc = 10.97:1 static CR

I don't know what's in the dish of a Hypatec, I've never measured one.

_________________
Simon

The adventures of an owner builder in the Tallarook Ranges

Image


Last edited by sgc on Mon Apr 20, 2009 4:05 pm, edited 3 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 20, 2009 4:01 pm 
Offline
This space for rent
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2007 12:40 pm
Posts: 5455
Location: Melbourne
gafmo wrote:
What head did you compare it to...Another 295 Head :idea:


I thought they were all 2.75" thick from face to face.. ?

Probably not a good idea to compare thicknesses between heads, unless you know your reference head hasn't been skimmed itself.

_________________
Simon

The adventures of an owner builder in the Tallarook Ranges

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 20, 2009 5:57 pm 
Offline
religious status
religious status
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 6:19 pm
Posts: 39764
Location: near Baulkham Hills, NSW
Valves won't hit the pistons, they don't reach full lift until pistons are 1/2 way down the bore.
At TDC with a sporty roady cam, valves won't be lifted more than .080".

_________________
DrMini- 1970 wasaMatic 1360, Mk1S crank, 86.6HP (ATW) =~125 @ crank, 45 Dellorto (38 chokes), RE282 sprint cam, 1.5 rockers, 11.0:1 C/R. :mrgreen:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 20, 2009 7:02 pm 
Offline
848cc
848cc

Joined: Sun May 09, 2004 6:12 pm
Posts: 267
Location: Adelaide
[/quote]

What head did you compare it to...Another 295 Head :idea:[/quote]

With a 202 head.Same thickness aren't they at 2.75" thick as well ?
Anyway it measured at 2.75 and the 295 at approx 2.63" or a touch under 67mm


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 20, 2009 7:05 pm 
Offline
religious status
religious status
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 6:19 pm
Posts: 39764
Location: near Baulkham Hills, NSW
All A series heads were ~2.750" thick when new. Give or take .010" or so...

_________________
DrMini- 1970 wasaMatic 1360, Mk1S crank, 86.6HP (ATW) =~125 @ crank, 45 Dellorto (38 chokes), RE282 sprint cam, 1.5 rockers, 11.0:1 C/R. :mrgreen:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 20, 2009 7:07 pm 
Offline
848cc
848cc

Joined: Sun May 09, 2004 6:12 pm
Posts: 267
Location: Adelaide
sgc wrote:

28.3cc std chamber vol - 0.120" skim = approx 18.3cc <--- [edit] I think this might be a little out since the chamber's not a perfect cylinder..



Ahh, I was working off 60 thou being 2.6cc and so 120 thou being 5.2cc giving 23.1cc.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 20, 2009 9:10 pm 
Offline
This space for rent
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2007 12:40 pm
Posts: 5455
Location: Melbourne
Drekkus wrote:
sgc wrote:

28.3cc std chamber vol - 0.120" skim = approx 18.3cc <--- [edit] I think this might be a little out since the chamber's not a perfect cylinder..



Ahh, I was working off 60 thou being 2.6cc and so 120 thou being 5.2cc giving 23.1cc.


That's probably more in the ballpark. My calcs assume the chamber is a perfect cylinder, which it obviously isn't.. and I haven't got any empirical measurements at the moment to adjust it ;)

_________________
Simon

The adventures of an owner builder in the Tallarook Ranges

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 20, 2009 9:56 pm 
Offline
848cc
848cc

Joined: Sun May 09, 2004 6:12 pm
Posts: 267
Location: Adelaide
sgc wrote:
Drekkus wrote:
sgc wrote:

28.3cc std chamber vol - 0.120" skim = approx 18.3cc <--- [edit] I think this might be a little out since the chamber's not a perfect cylinder..



Ahh, I was working off 60 thou being 2.6cc and so 120 thou being 5.2cc giving 23.1cc.


That's probably more in the ballpark. My calcs assume the chamber is a perfect cylinder, which it obviously isn't.. and I haven't got any empirical measurements at the moment to adjust it ;)


Working off my calculations you end up with 9.55 :1. Obviously I would still have to cc it all but my main concerns were whether or not the head is going to be usable/reliable and what "ball park" configuration I would need to get a decent compression.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 20, 2009 10:01 pm 
Offline
This space for rent
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2007 12:40 pm
Posts: 5455
Location: Melbourne
Drekkus wrote:
my main concerns were whether or not the head is going to be usable/reliable and what "ball park" configuration I would need to get a decent compression.


I would think at -120 thou reliability is going to be questionable, but if you've had no gasket issues while you've been using it then that's the proof. As for ballpark configuration, forget flat tops -- they're going to kick the CR too high for pump fuel unless you're running a race-style cam.

As far as I know, +.060" is the largest overbore you can get 1100 [edit] dished [/edit] pistons for -- I'm considering another bore on my car which is +.060 already, and I'll either have to find another +.040 block or use GR's +.080 flat tops and take some volume out the chambers.

Keen to know what you end up doing ;)

_________________
Simon

The adventures of an owner builder in the Tallarook Ranges

Image


Last edited by sgc on Mon Apr 20, 2009 10:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 20, 2009 10:45 pm 
Offline
848cc
848cc

Joined: Sun May 09, 2004 6:12 pm
Posts: 267
Location: Adelaide
sgc wrote:
Drekkus wrote:
my main concerns were whether or not the head is going to be usable/reliable and what "ball park" configuration I would need to get a decent compression.


Keen to know what you end up doing ;)


It will be a couple of months before get around to it as I'm doing the gearbox first.I don't have the money at the moment to do both at the same time.By that time maybe some other option will have presented its self.
At the moment I'm looking at working with what I've got.Collect things as I can afford it.Have a RE13 cam and most of the stuff for the gearbox so far.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 15 posts ] 

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Barkfast, Bing [Bot], TartanRed and 189 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

© 2016 Ausmini. All garage work involves equal measures of enthusiasm, ingenuity and a fair degree of irresponsibility.