| ausmini https://www.ausmini.com/forums/ |
|
| DEFECT https://www.ausmini.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=6962 |
Page 1 of 2 |
| Author: | willy [ Fri May 06, 2005 11:38 pm ] |
| Post subject: | DEFECT |
No i havent been defected lol. But here's some "light reading" Merry christmas all. I hope you're having a nice festive season. http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/sa/consol_reg/rtsr1999308/index.html |
|
| Author: | aussie [ Sat May 07, 2005 1:15 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
a few i found funny... A motor vehicle must not be fitted with a device that can make a sound like the sound of a siren, bell, exhaust whistle, compression whistle or repeater horn. (haha u cant have a siren or a bell fitted to your car) A motor vehicle with 3 or more wheels that is fitted with a windscreen must be fitted with at least 1 windscreen wiper unless a driver in a normal driving position can obtain an adequate view of the road ahead of the motor vehicle without looking through the windscreen. (haha 3 or more wheels, and i dont know how the rest could be possible really....) A motor vehicle must be able to turn in a circle not over 25 metres in diameter, measured by the outer edge of the tyre track at ground level. (We dont have a problem there!) A motor vehicle with an unloaded mass over 450 kilograms must be able to be driven both backwards and forwards when the driver is in the normal driving position. (hahah why did they choose 450 kilos) |
|
| Author: | mini75 [ Sat May 07, 2005 5:59 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Quote: A motor vehicle with 3 or more wheels that is fitted with a windscreen must be fitted with at least 1 windscreen wiper unless a driver in a normal driving position can obtain an adequate view of the road ahead of the motor vehicle without looking through the windscreen.
(haha 3 or more wheels, and i dont know how the rest could be possible really....) i think if u have a motor cycle u r exempted. 
JIM |
|
| Author: | simon k [ Sat May 07, 2005 7:01 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
aussie16 wrote: A motor vehicle with an unloaded mass over 450 kilograms must be able to be driven both backwards and forwards when the driver is in the normal driving position.
(hahah why did they choose 450 kilos) that ones interesting - probably stops bike engined minis from being registered, it may be possible to get it under 450kg, but not easy |
|
| Author: | aussie [ Sat May 07, 2005 8:50 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
skssgn wrote: aussie16 wrote: A motor vehicle with an unloaded mass over 450 kilograms must be able to be driven both backwards and forwards when the driver is in the normal driving position. (hahah why did they choose 450 kilos) that ones interesting - probably stops bike engined minis from being registered, it may be possible to get it under 450kg, but not easy well...you could take out all the seats....then u would be getting close maybe. how many kilos would a normal mini actually be? |
|
| Author: | simon k [ Sat May 07, 2005 9:34 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
a van is the lightest at 620kg, they can be lightened by using lighter competition brake parts, drums, callipers etc, and swiss cheesing the subframes and other bits. AFAIK Jaan Fox from Adelaide took 150kg out of a sedan, but not sure how legal it is, aside from drilling holes in everything, he cut 2 inches out of the body and another 2 inches out of the roof pillars |
|
| Author: | drmini in aust [ Sat May 07, 2005 10:02 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
skssgn wrote: a van is the lightest at 620kg, they can be lightened by using lighter competition brake parts, drums, callipers etc, and swiss cheesing the subframes and other bits. AFAIK Jaan Fox from Adelaide took 150kg out of a sedan, but not sure how legal it is, aside from drilling holes in everything, he cut 2 inches out of the body and another 2 inches out of the roof pillars
Um... a MOKE is lighter.. 530kg ? or something. 
|
|
| Author: | aussie [ Sat May 07, 2005 10:05 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
u could probably make a moke under 450 eh? |
|
| Author: | CPOCSM [ Sat May 07, 2005 11:13 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Electric reverse in minis with bike motors in them. There is a 4th pedal that operates a motor which in turn allows you to back the car up. Was in a MW mag a couple of years ago Rob Forsyth Miniot!! |
|
| Author: | Namibian CAMEL [ Sat May 07, 2005 11:55 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
so much more interesting when its relevent directly to you http://www.thelaw.tas.gov.au/tocview/in ... rec=;term= ill be entertained for ages now reading gb's of laws and rules hahaha
|
|
| Author: | Stuwey [ Sat May 07, 2005 11:57 pm ] |
| Post subject: | . |
My brothers' 850 Sports sedan... 480kgs with Mini engine. -Fibreglass Front -Fibreglass bootlid -Full ALLOY roll cage (as light as can be) -No rear seat base -No rear firewall -No parcelshelf -No boot floor -No door pockets -No front dashboard sheetmetal -Remaining door frames all drilled (they wobble like rolf harris if you only hold the top) -All perspex windows (except windscreen) -Rear subframe removed (tubular independant rear suspension) -No Tail-light backing plates (Too heavy) -No passenger seat (Thats where the fuel tank and battery sit -and yes, they're in sealed boxes) -Single wire electrical system -10x6 Mambas (about the lightest wheel usable) I don't think there is much more to be removed. Good luck getting another 30kgs out of it and still keep it registered... And i only looked here because i thought willy had been defected. Bugger. |
|
| Author: | Namibian CAMEL [ Sun May 08, 2005 12:05 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
165. Stopping in an emergency, &c., or to comply with another rule It is a defence to the prosecution of a driver for an offence against a provision of this Part if – (a) the driver stops at a particular place, or in a particular way, to avoid a collision, and the driver stops for no longer than is necessary to avoid the collision; or (b) the driver stops at a particular place, or in a particular way, because the driver’s vehicle is disabled, and the driver stops for no longer than is necessary for the vehicle to be moved safely to a place where the driver is permitted to park the vehicle under the Road Rules; or (c) the driver stops at a particular place, or in a particular way, to deal with a medical or other emergency, or to assist a disabled vehicle, and the driver stops for no longer than is necessary in the circumstances; or (d) the driver stops at a particular place, or in a particular way, because the condition of the driver, a passenger, or the driver’s vehicle makes it necessary for the driver to stop in the interests of safety, and the driver stops for no longer than is necessary in the circumstances; or (e) the driver stops at a particular place, or in a particular way, to comply with another provision of the Road Rules or a provision of another law, and the driver stops for no longer than is necessary to comply with the other provision. wow that nice of the govt
|
|
| Author: | Namibian CAMEL [ Sun May 08, 2005 12:14 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
sorry william for going off topic with my tassiean stuff hahaha maybe im missing the point, but this made me laugh quite a lot 236. Pedestrians not to cause a traffic hazard or obstruction (1) A pedestrian must not cause a traffic hazard by moving into the path of a driver. Penalty: Fine not exceeding 5 penalty units. (2) A pedestrian must not unreasonably obstruct the path of any driver or another pedestrian. Penalty: Fine not exceeding 5 penalty units. and a penalty unit = 'a penalty of a number of dollars equal to the product obtained by multiplying $100 by the number of penalty units so prescribed or so specified' or sopmething 
|
|
| Author: | cush [ Sun May 08, 2005 1:03 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
500 bux for walking in someone's way.... hmm... |
|
| Author: | willy [ Sun May 08, 2005 5:57 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
HAHA. 
"Get outta my path or i'm calling the cops and you'll get fined" 
|
|
| Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC + 10 hours |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|