Harley wrote:
I had a 70s 1100 van engine in my 88 rover. Just had to have the charcoal canister and breather lines back into the air filter (same as what the car would've orginally).
No worries then
But who really looks that closely at it all?
| ausmini https://www.ausmini.com/forums/ |
|
| can this be done??? https://www.ausmini.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=69994 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | Mike Montgomery [ Thu Apr 07, 2011 6:41 am ] |
| Post subject: | can this be done??? |
Is there any major issues dropping an old motor in a Rover body?? I know the top engine steady needs to be added. |
|
| Author: | simon k [ Thu Apr 07, 2011 9:53 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
shouldn't be any major hassles - would probably need to retain the rover subframe though |
|
| Author: | GT mowog [ Thu Apr 07, 2011 7:04 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
It may well have to comply to the ADR's to which the body was made or certified to. In the case of the engine, this mostly means emissions. That's why Rover went to EFI (in it's various forms) in the first place. |
|
| Author: | Harley [ Thu Apr 07, 2011 7:25 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
I had a 70s 1100 van engine in my 88 rover. Just had to have the charcoal canister and breather lines back into the air filter (same as what the car would've orginally). |
|
| Author: | GT mowog [ Thu Apr 07, 2011 7:38 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Harley wrote: I had a 70s 1100 van engine in my 88 rover. Just had to have the charcoal canister and breather lines back into the air filter (same as what the car would've orginally).
No worries then But who really looks that closely at it all?
|
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC + 10 hours |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|