| ausmini https://www.ausmini.com/forums/ |
|
| Vee Hikel Knumb Bears https://www.ausmini.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=7019 |
Page 1 of 5 |
| Author: | cush [ Mon May 09, 2005 4:32 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Vee Hikel Knumb Bears |
ermm... or.... Vehicle Numbers I've just noticed.... our young orange friend, meeni has a 1962 850 with a car number of 51608 whereas our fat grey loser (me) has a 1964 850 with a car number of 46841..... as Pope John Pauline Howardson says... 
Pweese Expwain? edit.. i've just read this... it is BY FAR the weirdest post i've ever made.... 
|
|
| Author: | aussie [ Mon May 09, 2005 4:45 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
i was just from the title...Vee Hikel Knumb Bears...ahh yea i get it 
|
|
| Author: | willy [ Mon May 09, 2005 4:49 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Oh bunny rabbit. He's competing for the "Odd-ball Award of 2005" against Namibian Camel.  
|
|
| Author: | cush [ Mon May 09, 2005 4:50 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
i knew the question in the post would get lost amongst the dribble |
|
| Author: | Smokie [ Mon May 09, 2005 5:20 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Since I don't know the answer, I will just add a bit more dribble then..... |
|
| Author: | benjamin [ Mon May 09, 2005 5:32 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
maybe it travelled in time 
|
|
| Author: | awdmoke [ Mon May 09, 2005 5:34 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
MC_Cush wrote: i knew the question in the post would get lost amongst the dribble
As if you don't deserve it 
|
|
| Author: | Rupert [ Mon May 09, 2005 5:46 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Yours is an earlier model than his, no doubt. Is his a 62? is yours a 64? REALLY??? |
|
| Author: | meeni [ Mon May 09, 2005 6:07 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
sure urs is a 64? mine is definately a 62. |
|
| Author: | meeni [ Mon May 09, 2005 6:18 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
maybe mine was imported before the mini was built over here, as they didnt have a mini factory sraight away |
|
| Author: | J_A_M [ Mon May 09, 2005 9:28 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Maybe Doc Emmet Brown fitted a flux capacitor to the back of your Mini, before it was finished on the factory line...and went forward in time (when he hit 88mph).....but was caught...and the Mini was sold as a 1964 model, yet it really was built in 1960......ey ey ey.....
|
|
| Author: | Stuwey [ Mon May 09, 2005 9:37 pm ] |
| Post subject: | . |
Be careful when you go to regency... They always ask on 850s "Why is the body number there?!!!!" in the most stern voice possible. All that they know is that mini numbers are on the rad shroud. They were about to hack all the paint off a brand-new restotation that Steve and I took down there one day for an ID inspecion.. Aargh! NO! Dont do that! Its an 850!... and thats where all the trouble started. It had a 1275, so the displacement increase was more than allowable. It already had 8.4" Rover discs, so then they said that the wheel track was too wide. Now we needed a Certificate Of Modification. Dont you just love the Government? |
|
| Author: | willy [ Mon May 09, 2005 9:41 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Two pop rivets + One power drill and drill bit + New (old) ID Plate = New car
Cmon Stewie; it's only SA! 
|
|
| Author: | Morris 1100 [ Mon May 09, 2005 9:43 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
meeni wrote: sure urs is a 64? mine is definately a 62.
How do you know yours is a 62? The number sounds way too high for a 62. 
|
|
| Author: | cush [ Mon May 09, 2005 10:33 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
that's what i was thinking.. doc has a 64 with a couple of thousand difference to mine... |
|
| Page 1 of 5 | All times are UTC + 10 hours |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|