Ausmini
It is currently Sat Aug 09, 2025 11:36 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 16 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Nov 05, 2011 1:03 pm 
Offline
1098cc
1098cc
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 9:59 pm
Posts: 1428
Location: Perth
I have just come into possession of an A+ short motor which looks to have had a huge amount of money thrown at it. It has a 296 scatter cam in it and I'm wondering if this will be good for my supercharged A+1293 which currently runs a stock metro turbo cam.

I have read numerous conflicting stories so was wondering if anyone has had first hand experience with this cam?

The car Im thinking of putting it into is only a weekend toy but the build im going for is reliability over anything else.

_________________
1965 Riley Elf
1974 Ex Army Moke
1997 Rover Cooper
2002 JCW Cooper
2003 JCW Cooper S


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Nov 05, 2011 1:52 pm 
Offline
998cc
998cc

Joined: Tue Feb 07, 2006 7:34 am
Posts: 950
Location: brisvages
Because of the negative effects of overlap on a supercharger car’s performance, and especially in the case of high exhaust back pressure as is the case with most factory supercharged cars, we find that the optimal cam duration for the intake cam is typically 30-40* of duration less than a normally aspirated camshaft for the same peak power RPM. The decision to reduce the intake cam duration rather than split the duration reduction between the intake and exhaust cams, is that the intake cam will flow air under pressurized conditions (due to the addition of the supercharger and the increase in intake manifold pressure) and so at a reduced intake cam duration the engine will still be able to get it’s full share of intake air. At the same time, the high rpm effeciency improvement from the reduction of overlap will also boost power production with a more conservative cam. Finally, if we would like to get more flow from the intake cam, there is still the option of using a higher lift camshaft (with a steeper profile due to the decreased duration) with supporting valvetrain modifications to make sure valve float doesn’t occur at higher rpms.

_________________
A good friend will come and bail you out of jail...but a true friend will be sitting next to you saying "Damn...that was fun!"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Nov 05, 2011 2:23 pm 
Offline
religious status
religious status
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 6:19 pm
Posts: 39764
Location: near Baulkham Hills, NSW
^^ short version= there is so much valve overlap with big cams you will blow 1/2 the intake charge down the exhaust port whilst both valves are open. :cry:

The usual fix for this is reduce the duration by heaps, or increase the LCA (which Graham Russell does for his turbo grinds).
I would forgo using the 296, and get an RE13T, which is designed for boost and kicks a Metro turbo cam's arse out the window. 8)

_________________
DrMini- 1970 wasaMatic 1360, Mk1S crank, 86.6HP (ATW) =~125 @ crank, 45 Dellorto (38 chokes), RE282 sprint cam, 1.5 rockers, 11.0:1 C/R. :mrgreen:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Nov 05, 2011 2:51 pm 
Offline
1098cc
1098cc
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 9:59 pm
Posts: 1428
Location: Perth
Ok, might just leave the SC engine it as is for the time being then.

The moke has a metro engine, twin carbs, electronic dissy, extractors etc. Would this be better suited for it?

_________________
1965 Riley Elf
1974 Ex Army Moke
1997 Rover Cooper
2002 JCW Cooper
2003 JCW Cooper S


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Nov 05, 2011 8:12 pm 
Offline
848cc
848cc

Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2011 8:36 pm
Posts: 114
Location: Perth
Dont be looking at your moke :lol: You have a traveller that needs some lovin first :wink:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Nov 05, 2011 9:03 pm 
Offline
1098cc
1098cc
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 9:59 pm
Posts: 1428
Location: Perth
Yes must focus on the traveller but that short motor keeps looking at me. Your fault you should of taken it Mr hot 1100 build.

_________________
1965 Riley Elf
1974 Ex Army Moke
1997 Rover Cooper
2002 JCW Cooper
2003 JCW Cooper S


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Nov 06, 2011 9:37 am 
Offline
848cc
848cc

Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2011 8:36 pm
Posts: 114
Location: Perth
A question for those in the know.Would more boost overcome the overlap problem?I know it wont eliminate the loss but if your losing half can you just put twice as much in?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Nov 06, 2011 2:00 pm 
Offline
religious status
religious status
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 6:19 pm
Posts: 39764
Location: near Baulkham Hills, NSW
Um...
No it won't. :wink:

_________________
DrMini- 1970 wasaMatic 1360, Mk1S crank, 86.6HP (ATW) =~125 @ crank, 45 Dellorto (38 chokes), RE282 sprint cam, 1.5 rockers, 11.0:1 C/R. :mrgreen:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 07, 2011 9:03 pm 
Offline
848cc
848cc

Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2011 8:36 pm
Posts: 114
Location: Perth
Thanks Doc 8)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 15, 2011 6:53 pm 
Offline
1098cc
1098cc
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 9:59 pm
Posts: 1428
Location: Perth
Here are some pics of the short motor, what are the shiny rings around the bore?
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image

_________________
1965 Riley Elf
1974 Ex Army Moke
1997 Rover Cooper
2002 JCW Cooper
2003 JCW Cooper S


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 15, 2011 7:05 pm 
Offline
1098cc
1098cc
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2008 8:03 pm
Posts: 1479
Location: Qld, Brisbane
The "rings" around the bore are sleeves. So the block has been bored out then had sleeves put it.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 15, 2011 7:18 pm 
Offline
1098cc
1098cc
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 9:59 pm
Posts: 1428
Location: Perth
Is that a good or a bad thing?

_________________
1965 Riley Elf
1974 Ex Army Moke
1997 Rover Cooper
2002 JCW Cooper
2003 JCW Cooper S


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 15, 2011 7:29 pm 
Offline
998cc
998cc
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 27, 2005 3:19 pm
Posts: 630
Location: Blue Mountains
mini_mad_matt wrote:
The "rings" around the bore are sleeves. So the block has been bored out then had sleeves put it.

I'm thinking they flame rings coz its built for big compression


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Rings in Block
PostPosted: Tue Nov 15, 2011 7:33 pm 
Offline
848cc
848cc
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 10:15 am
Posts: 116
Location: Wollongong (South of Sydney)
Hi
No Sorry not sleeves.The rings in the top of the block around the bores is called 'O' Ringing.
This is done to put more bite into the head gasket to seal better.Used to be standard performance thing to do for years.

Thanks
Ian

_________________
850 Morris Mini
Morris Mini Traveller
Mini sports Sedan


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 15, 2011 7:33 pm 
Offline
1098cc
1098cc
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2008 8:03 pm
Posts: 1479
Location: Qld, Brisbane
hmm i just had a closer look at the picture and i think you're right norton. My bad.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 16 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: watsupskip and 81 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

© 2016 Ausmini. All garage work involves equal measures of enthusiasm, ingenuity and a fair degree of irresponsibility.