ausmini https://www.ausmini.com/forums/ |
|
is 2" to big? https://www.ausmini.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=80486 |
Page 1 of 2 |
Author: | tinymorris1969 [ Mon Feb 25, 2013 9:04 pm ] |
Post subject: | is 2" to big? |
just getting the exhaust sorted on my mini and was thinking of just changing the pipe to 2" but im starting to think that might be to big.. would that be right? the motor is a 1310. |
Author: | PDJ [ Mon Feb 25, 2013 9:27 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
1 3/4 |
Author: | drmini in aust [ Mon Feb 25, 2013 9:38 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
2" is OK on mine (1360) and Chong's (1330) but both these motors are giving 120HP+ at the crank. A 1310 roady 1310 motor on SUs will be happier with a 1-3/4" system. RC40 and a Maniflow LCB works good. |
Author: | Kennomini [ Mon Feb 25, 2013 9:52 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Quote: Is 2" to big?
Their is not many places you can seriously ask a question like that and still expect a decent answer ![]() ![]() |
Author: | Lillee [ Mon Feb 25, 2013 10:10 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Kennomini wrote: Quote: Is 2" to big? Their is not many places you can seriously ask a question like that and still expect a decent answer ![]() ![]() Well I was going to say not bad if you're a possum or something ![]() But yes, 1 3/4 is plenty up to and including 100bhp. More than that 2" is worth about 5-7hp over 1 3/4 but your intake and port work has to match as well as medium or large bore headers. I'd say do 1 3/4 for more low end torque. PS. I set a car alarm off the other day (regular occurrence) just by idling next to it, and it was inside a garage and I was outside ![]() |
Author: | TheMiniMan [ Tue Feb 26, 2013 8:31 am ] |
Post subject: | |
most of the girls would probably suggest that 2" is not enough ![]() |
Author: | 66S [ Tue Feb 26, 2013 10:42 am ] |
Post subject: | |
I told my wife 2" is big !! Al |
Author: | Speedwell Racer [ Tue Feb 26, 2013 12:02 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
My mate has a 2 inch stainless system on his +110thou 998. Yes it had lots of work done and a downdraft webber but it didn't kill back pressure at all and it was pulling 92hp atw.. Sounded really sweet aswell!! I'd go a 2 inch on anything above 1275. That's my opinion anyway! |
Author: | -=MiniMafia=- [ Tue Feb 26, 2013 12:32 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
92 horse power, u sure? And mat, 2" wide should be plenty;) |
Author: | Kennomini [ Tue Feb 26, 2013 4:51 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
TheMiniMan wrote: most of the girls would probably suggest that 2" is not enough
![]() Well, we are talking diameter ![]() |
Author: | willy [ Tue Feb 26, 2013 5:23 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Kennomini wrote: TheMiniMan wrote: most of the girls would probably suggest that 2" is not enough ![]() Well, we are talking diameter ![]() A topic posted by TINY morris... about 2 inches. And the plot thickens! |
Author: | TheMiniMan [ Tue Feb 26, 2013 7:55 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
-=MiniMafia=- wrote: And mat, 2" wide should be plenty;) nah,,, sorry,,, i did type something but i couldnt,, so deleted it ![]() |
Author: | tinymorris1969 [ Tue Feb 26, 2013 8:58 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
haha willy, 2" around though lol |
Author: | Speedwell Racer [ Tue Feb 26, 2013 9:40 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
-=MiniMafia=- wrote: 92 horse power, u sure?
And mat, 2" wide should be plenty;) I saw the dyno results with my own eyes. Yea I didn't believe it until I saw it. 207ft pounds of torque aswell!! |
Author: | -=MiniMafia=- [ Tue Feb 26, 2013 9:57 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Is this guy in tassie? Would love to see how it goes against my low compression n/a 1100cc. I would be stoked with a 2" width. |
Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC + 10 hours |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |