ausmini https://www.ausmini.com/forums/ |
|
Infra-red thermometers https://www.ausmini.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=80811 |
Page 1 of 1 |
Author: | drmini in aust [ Fri Mar 22, 2013 3:21 pm ] |
Post subject: | Infra-red thermometers |
There was a thread a while back where I listed a jaycar one for $50. Her's one like I just bought from my local bearing shop: http://microtempusa.com/micro-temp-ther ... mt100.html A$29 he sells for, cheaper for ca$h... ![]() |
Author: | Mokesta [ Fri Mar 22, 2013 3:28 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Nice and cheap that! As the text in the link states, these fixed emissivity readers are only correct for rough, dark surfaces. For a tyre they would be great. For the surface of a brake rotor they would be quite inaccurate. For things in between like a hot exhaust, their accuracy would depend on the surface coating of the object being measured. Just because it has a digital readout with many digits doesn't meant the number is right. M |
Author: | drmini in aust [ Fri Mar 22, 2013 3:30 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
All I bought it for was radiator temp so it should be OK. or near enough... ![]() |
Author: | 9YaTaH [ Fri Mar 22, 2013 6:46 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
drmini in aust wrote: All I bought it for was radiator temp so it should be OK. or near enough...
![]() Gawd!! Issy would be horrified at what you Boffins are doing to his beloved Brick ![]() ![]() |
Author: | drmini in aust [ Fri Mar 22, 2013 6:59 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
9YaTaH wrote: drmini in aust wrote: All I bought it for was radiator temp so it should be OK. or near enough... ![]() Gawd!! Issy would be horrified at what you Boffins are doing to his beloved Brick ![]() ![]() It allows me to check the accuracy of the Verrrry British Smiths temperature gauge and its 1950s (40s?) design `voltage stabilizer' ![]() Also handy on the street for checking whether chicks are hot, or not... ![]() |
Author: | smac [ Sat Mar 23, 2013 5:50 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Mokesta wrote: Nice and cheap that!
As the text in the link states, these fixed emissivity readers are only correct for rough, dark surfaces. For a tyre they would be great. For the surface of a brake rotor they would be quite inaccurate. For things in between like a hot exhaust, their accuracy would depend on the surface coating of the object being measured. Just because it has a digital readout with many digits doesn't meant the number is right. M The reading I've done (which I'm damned if I can find now) indicated that while they are less accurate measuring 'reflective' surfaces, this error will be quite small %-wise. This seems to be the case testing the unit I have - if I check a variety of surfaces sitting at room temperature, including everything from gloss tiles to wood to paper to carpet, the variance is less than half a degree. This has been true outside in winter (less than 10c) and summer (over 30c inside). |
Author: | CPOCSM [ Sat Mar 23, 2013 9:05 am ] |
Post subject: | |
We used raytek temp readers with defence as they were compact and gave accurate readings. I suppose it is a moot point having one when you are seeing the paint blistering off a ships bulkhead though ![]() Hooroo |
Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC + 10 hours |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |