ausmini
https://www.ausmini.com/forums/

Mk1 Lockheed booster finish
https://www.ausmini.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=89818
Page 1 of 2

Author:  IndigoBlueCooperS [ Fri Jun 26, 2015 9:58 pm ]
Post subject:  Mk1 Lockheed booster finish

How was the Mk1 booster finished when they came from the factory?
Black body with plated bits, or grey hammertone, or what?
I did my last one with a black body and silver grey hammertone bits.
Looks OK but is it period correct?

Image

Author:  Morris 1100 [ Fri Jun 26, 2015 10:10 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Mk1 Lockheed booster finish

I love that engine bay. I love the other one too...

Image

Author:  IndigoBlueCooperS [ Fri Jun 26, 2015 10:28 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Mk1 Lockheed booster finish

Upgraded Engine bay :D
But any comments on the Lockeed booster finish?

Image

Image

Image

Author:  Morris 1100 [ Fri Jun 26, 2015 10:48 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Mk1 Lockheed booster finish

IndigoBlueCooperS wrote:
But any comments on the Lockheed booster finish?

Sorry, I have no idea. (I much prefer the VH44 anyway! :mrgreen: )

Author:  gtogreen1969 [ Fri Jun 26, 2015 11:05 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Mk1 Lockheed booster finish

Mine looks like the top photo.

Author:  AJ [ Sat Jun 27, 2015 12:35 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Mk1 Lockheed booster finish

Yes that is correct looking for the Lockheed booster , but if you wanted it to be totally original , the sheet metal parts were originally zinc plated , and the cast body was not painted at all(but tends to rust if left unpainted) Most places tend to finish them in silver and black :D

http://www.ebay.com.au/itm/MINI-COOPER- ... 419848bfe3

Author:  brett [ Sat Jun 27, 2015 5:42 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Mk1 Lockheed booster finish

viewtopic.php?f=32&t=84039

Author:  Bill B [ Sat Jun 27, 2015 7:42 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Mk1 Lockheed booster finish

This question has intrigued the mind of restorers for a long time.
AJ seems pretty close to the mark. If you don't paint it, it rusts, if you do paint it, it still looks tacky when eaten by brake fluid. Plating is more effective if not technically correct, according to this:
Here is a link to the UK mk1 Forum. Membership application is fairly quick and some things are interesting for restoration.
http://mk1-forum.net/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=11289
Bill

Author:  Mick [ Sat Jun 27, 2015 7:57 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Mk1 Lockheed booster finish

I don't have a picture, but I hit the cast iron section of my Lockheed booster with some clear coat when it went back together. Not much, just a coat, not even so much as to make it shine so no more than a dusting of the stuff. Six years later it still looks very good.

I reckon there's something neat in the way the gloss patina goes off shiny plated parts of the engine, just as it did from new, but I didn't like the idea of the body getting all brown..

Author:  Bill B [ Sat Jun 27, 2015 8:09 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Mk1 Lockheed booster finish

Mick wrote:
I don't have a picture, but I hit the cast iron section of my Lockheed booster with some clear coat when it went back together. Not much, just a coat, not even so much as to make it shine so no more than a dusting of the stuff. Six years later it still looks very good.

Is that 2K clear?
Bill

Author:  Mick [ Sat Jun 27, 2015 8:57 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Mk1 Lockheed booster finish

Bill B wrote:
Mick wrote:
I don't have a picture, but I hit the cast iron section of my Lockheed booster with some clear coat when it went back together. Not much, just a coat, not even so much as to make it shine so no more than a dusting of the stuff. Six years later it still looks very good.

Is that 2K clear?
Bill



Nothing as special as that is required. Just a standard clear coat from a spray can. Something like this one below in a satin.

I've used a lot of polyurethane clear coat paints in the past to keep brass and bronze in a salty marine environment looking good, so it followed that it will work well everywhere else.

Just a dusting, no point to make it look all shiny.

https://2ecffd01e1ab3e9383f0-07db7b9624 ... e18f62.jpg

Author:  miniron [ Sun Jun 28, 2015 10:01 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Mk1 Lockheed booster finish

The cylinder body was never painted. It was left as cast.
The vacuum body pressed metal parts can come in 2 types of finish.
Early cars had a zinc plated finish in a siiver grey colour.
Later cars had a zinc plated finish that was passivated and this gave it a pale gold colour.
Passivation is an additional anti corrosion process to provide better rust protection than zinc plating alone.
I had the booster parts replated several years ago as it started to corrode at the bottom of the clamp that holds the 2 halves of the vacuum cylinder together.
This was caused by water collection at the base of the clamping ring which had the clamp screw positioned on the side and not the bottom so water couldn't drain away properly.
It was like this from new.
So make sure you position the clamp at the bottom and not the side.

RonR

Author:  low n blown [ Mon Jun 29, 2015 9:55 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Mk1 Lockheed booster finish

miniron wrote:
The cylinder body was never painted. It was left as cast.
The vacuum body pressed metal parts can come in 2 types of finish.
Early cars had a zinc plated finish in a siiver grey colour.
Later cars had a zinc plated finish that was passivated and this gave it a pale gold colour.
Passivation is an additional anti corrosion process to provide better rust protection than zinc plating alone.
I had the booster parts replated several years ago as it started to corrode at the bottom of the clamp that holds the 2 halves of the vacuum cylinder together.
This was caused by water collection at the base of the clamping ring which had the clamp screw positioned on the side and not the bottom so water couldn't drain away properly.
It was like this from new.
So make sure you position the clamp at the bottom and not the side.

RonR


I think you will find that they weren't actually Zinc coated rather they were originally done with cadmium which is a highly toxic process and is no longer done. Zinc coating is the only real alternative that looks close and comes in Blue (silver) and Gold passivated. The Gold is too gold and the blue is too silver, so we don't really have a spot on solution. If you blue zinc it you get the closest finish, but it does start out looking too shiny and takes a bit of age to look correct.
G.

Author:  Hanra [ Tue Jun 30, 2015 10:13 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Mk1 Lockheed booster finish

Is there more info on that car? Two donks. Thats cool!

Author:  Mick [ Tue Jun 30, 2015 5:47 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Mk1 Lockheed booster finish

low n blown wrote:
Zinc coating is the only real alternative that looks close and comes in Blue (silver) and Gold passivated. The Gold is too gold and the blue is too silver, so we don't really have a spot on solution.
G.


I thought I was losing my mind when I recall that my one was gold on the inside. You;re the first person to authenticate this crazy thought in my mind.

Yes the modern gold plate is waaaay gold. We have quite a bit of legacy cadmium plating around my work amongst electronic racks, and it is a different finish being still gold like you say.

Page 1 of 2 All times are UTC + 10 hours
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/