Graeme H wrote:
Assuming that you asked for "a wheel alignment" then I think they've done pretty much what should be expected (and what you'd have paid for). Specifically:
• When they look up a Mini, their book will say that front toe is the only adjustable setting (if such an old car is listed at all).
• They see the task as preventing uneven tyre wear, not tuning your car's handling.
• Having seen your tyres, they are looking for the cause of the rapidly wearing outer edges.
• They have measured front and rear camber to check for anything badly bent and to set the toe.
• The huge toe-in (7.7mm) is consistent with the uneven tyre wear, so they reasonably expect that correcting the toe will fix your tyre wear problem.
• The camber and castor are out of spec but not wildly, so not worth recommending major surgery.
Thanks Graeme, this answers my question pretty well.
The reason I put the adjustable suspension in was because one my trailing arms was bent, and all the rubbers where needing to be replaced, so i figured i'd put lower arms on while I was at it.
I didn't ask for anything specific, and it only cost my $44 for the actual alignment part of the job... so i guess I got what I paid for.
Given that the camber is not to far out, and even with my own eye I can see that its now Negative camber, where previously with the old components I had slight positive camber.. I think i'll drive it for a few weeks and see how the wear goes.
The new parts (tie rods/ lower arms/ poly bushes and new tyres) have made such a huge difference to the car, ride quality has sky rocketed!