Ausmini
It is currently Fri Jul 18, 2025 12:42 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 38 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 16, 2006 5:01 pm 
Offline
1098cc
1098cc
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 5:48 pm
Posts: 1200
Location: Brisbane, QLD
awdmoke wrote:
CHS Circular Hollow Section
RHS Rectangular Hollow Section
SHS Square Hollow Section

All very technical :roll:


CHS...thats the one i couldnt remember :P heh...simple though it be :oops: in my own defense i did say "etc" after the RHS...

_________________
Bling me up Scotty!
"wait till it grows into a plant...then bunny rabbit THE PLANT!"

1966 Morris Mini DeLuxe FOR SALE


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 16, 2006 5:39 pm 
Offline
998cc
998cc
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2004 2:41 pm
Posts: 1145
Location: ACT
I used 2.3m wall thickness 35mm ID CHS for my subframe. I think 3mm is probably more than sufficient and 4mm is just overkill and in some ways with the thicker stuff unless you are using welding system that is good for thick steel (eg stick) then you can actually have less penetration and thus a weaker subframe. This should now create a whole discussion by itself :lol:

Cheers

_________________
225hp atw on 14psi. 1/4 Mile no idea. Take one 1971 Mini Clubman, one Starlet GT Halfcut, Simmer over a warm MIG Welder, and Voila Minstar! www.mpdesign.id.au
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 16, 2006 5:46 pm 
Offline
1098cc
1098cc
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 5:48 pm
Posts: 1200
Location: Brisbane, QLD
minstar wrote:
I used 2.3m wall thickness 35mm ID CHS for my subframe. I think 3mm is probably more than sufficient and 4mm is just overkill and in some ways with the thicker stuff unless you are using welding system that is good for thick steel (eg stick) then you can actually have less penetration and thus a weaker subframe. This should now create a whole discussion by itself :lol:

Cheers


i have heard that mig really isnt that great above 3mm (for penetration reasons as stated previously and by you minstar) hence why i am leaning more toward a thicker gauge (coz i love the stick :wink: )...in my experience stick is pretty tricky when you get too far below 3mm...plenty of holey 2mm plate and RHS in a crate under my mum's house to prove it :P too high amperage and too thin steel = a bloody mess :P

_________________
Bling me up Scotty!
"wait till it grows into a plant...then bunny rabbit THE PLANT!"

1966 Morris Mini DeLuxe FOR SALE


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 16, 2006 7:43 pm 
Offline
1275cc
1275cc
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2004 1:52 pm
Posts: 4434
Location: Melbourne, VIC.
I'm reading this with interest, because my old ARC welder gave up on me last weekend. ($50 at a garage sale years ago!) The adjusting knob has seized solid at the lowest setting. I found I could weld 1.6-2mm metal with it without blowing holes if I was careful.

But now I have to replace it I'm leaning towards a Gas and Gasless type MIG. It sounds like I will still be able to weld up subframe mounts etc with it.

I've never used a MIG before, but I'm told it's a lot easier than Arc? Yes/No?

(Sorry for stealing the thread!)

Cheers,

_________________
Brett Nicholson
Greendale (near Ballan) VIC.
1971 Morris Mini Moke
1966 Austin Mini
1965 Morris Mini Traveller
1973 LR Series 3 88
2007 LR Freelander 2


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 16, 2006 7:52 pm 
Offline
1360cc
1360cc
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 03, 2005 1:41 pm
Posts: 12311
Location: Rockingham - Collie WA
Easier, yes.

Also easier to put down a weld that looks OK but lacks any real penetration.
Once you think you have your settings right, weld a fillet with a couple of pieces of scrap & then snap the weld with a BFH. That will show you if you are getting a sound weld.

_________________
Too many cars, and too little time.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 17, 2006 11:46 am 
Offline
1275cc
1275cc
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2004 1:52 pm
Posts: 4434
Location: Melbourne, VIC.
Thanks, will do. Same as what I did when learning Arc.

Watto just bought a MIG and his wife told me he's been practising by making all these gardening tools. :)

_________________
Brett Nicholson
Greendale (near Ballan) VIC.
1971 Morris Mini Moke
1966 Austin Mini
1965 Morris Mini Traveller
1973 LR Series 3 88
2007 LR Freelander 2


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Subframes
PostPosted: Wed Jan 18, 2006 11:03 pm 
Offline
848cc
848cc
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 5:31 pm
Posts: 181
Location: Central Tilba NSW
According to the engineer I'm useing 2mm wall thickness minimum for any
tubular subframe
I'm useing 26.9od 2.3w CHS AS1163 C350 lo

Blue

_________________
Keep shiny side up


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jan 18, 2006 11:05 pm 
Offline
1275cc
1275cc
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 03, 2004 2:56 pm
Posts: 3981
Location: Brisbane
So am I, apparently......


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: subframe
PostPosted: Wed Jan 18, 2006 11:33 pm 
Offline
848cc
848cc
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 5:31 pm
Posts: 181
Location: Central Tilba NSW
Yes

Blue

_________________
Keep shiny side up


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 20, 2006 12:23 pm 
Offline
848cc
848cc

Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2005 4:04 pm
Posts: 113
ok, look i would recommend MIG, and doing a tafe course to boot. I've played with a fair bit of chassis stuff on minitrucks, and can tell you that the mig gets great penetration. i have a 190 amp sitting here, wich will look after the 1/4" plate we were using for plating frames and notches, a mate even Xrayed some at work, just for bragging rights...

mig
quicker
easier
better

IMHO

_________________
http://www.minisport.com.au
the guys there are dead set champions


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 20, 2006 12:26 pm 
Offline
1098cc
1098cc
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 5:48 pm
Posts: 1200
Location: Brisbane, QLD
nathanSMC wrote:
ok, look i would recommend MIG, and doing a tafe course to boot. I've played with a fair bit of chassis stuff on minitrucks, and can tell you that the mig gets great penetration. i have a 190 amp sitting here, wich will look after the 1/4" plate we were using for plating frames and notches, a mate even Xrayed some at work, just for bragging rights...

mig
quicker
easier
better

IMHO


i wanted to do mig too...but i have to do a tafe course or it would end up looking and working like a crap-sandwich...unfortunately the only tafe course that does mig stuff is full :( so i'd have to wait till august to get enrollment :S which is too long :P i'll just use beefier RHS and hit it with the stick...

_________________
Bling me up Scotty!
"wait till it grows into a plant...then bunny rabbit THE PLANT!"

1966 Morris Mini DeLuxe FOR SALE


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 20, 2006 12:45 pm 
Offline
1275cc
1275cc
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 03, 2004 2:56 pm
Posts: 3981
Location: Brisbane
Would you quit it with the RHS stuff.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 20, 2006 12:47 pm 
Offline
1098cc
1098cc
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 5:48 pm
Posts: 1200
Location: Brisbane, QLD
striped 63 wrote:
Would you quit it with the RHS stuff.


i have actually decided to go with RHS...that VTEC frame i showed ya uses RHS for everything...should be able to adapt the design and make it work for the 4efte...thats the plan anyway...we'll see how it pans out :)

Image

_________________
Bling me up Scotty!
"wait till it grows into a plant...then bunny rabbit THE PLANT!"

1966 Morris Mini DeLuxe FOR SALE


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 20, 2006 3:17 pm 
Offline
848cc
848cc
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2005 3:58 am
Posts: 426
Location: On a mission...
RHS, CHS, SHS... doesn't matter what you use if you're welding is sh1t :D

And on the topic of CHS I have seen CDS (Cold Drawn Seamless) posted a few times. IMO it's not really necessary to use seamless tube. Is this what engineers as specifying must be used???

_________________
Metal to burn, sparks to fly...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 20, 2006 3:31 pm 
Offline
1360cc
1360cc
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 03, 2005 1:41 pm
Posts: 12311
Location: Rockingham - Collie WA
No. They are happy with any suitably sized structural member.

I think they suggest CDS to keep weight down & so the uninformed do make a subframe out of water pipe :wink:

_________________
Too many cars, and too little time.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 38 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

© 2016 Ausmini. All garage work involves equal measures of enthusiasm, ingenuity and a fair degree of irresponsibility.