Quote:
Hi Alex
First of all if your going to shoot your mouth off on thr other forum get your facts straight i am the only one making 1100cc flat top piston they are not cut down 998 pistons, they do not hit the dizzy shaft, and if you knew any thing about piston design you would not turn the top off 998 pistons for the 1100 as the crown height is .250 thich if you take .145 off you wind up with less than .100 in places which is way to thin for a crown height and it is going to crack.
Graham Russell
Graham,
I didn't I mention anyones name about anything on any forum. Annnnd with regards to the exact amount to take off, I don't remember what it was off the top of my head, I usually measure it before I start, I have a lot of numbers rattlling around in my head so I always check before I start. I remembered
you mentioning machining crowns down so I looked up what
you said about it here. That is where I got the 0.140" figure from.
http://www.minimania.com/article/1881/P ... re__Part_1Quote:
Over the next few issues I’ll look at how to get the best results from an 1098cc engine. The bore for the 998cc and 1098cc engines are the same, but the 1098cc, with its longer stroke, will produce a better spread of torque across the rev range. If you wanted to do a 998cc the process is much the same. The engine will not give as good a torque figure, but it will rev more freely at the top end..........
With our project motor I’m going to bore the block +0.040” (40 thou’) oversize. As we are not going down the forced-induction path, we will be running high compression pistons - I like to run around 10.5:1 for more power without sacrificing reliability. Now, you could go out and buy some special flat-top pistons, but part of the point of doing this motor is to save money. If you use the standard 998cc pistons, you can machine off the 0.140” crown, to get flat top pistons much more economically.
One set of modified 998 pistons I pulled out of an engine did hit the dizzy shaft, that's how I ended up with it, and that's how I know to check for it. I don't know who did them, it's not a hard modification to do, anyone with a lathe could do it. As for the thickness in the crown, if you do it with the pistons I listed above, the thinnest part of the crown is still just as thick as a as what it is on a 10cc 1275 piston, and no, I don't remember how thick that was, only that I checked it against a few other pistons to see how thin they were and realised there was a similar amount of matterial left to what was on other piston designs standard. The ones that I pulled out had a crown thickness of something like 3 or 4mm thick from memory and working reliably, and the last time I spoke to 850man, the modified set I sent him were still working fine as well, even in an engine making 70hp atw. So as far as reliablity goes, it looks like the proof is in the pudding on that one.
I didn't come up with the idea, I found it, and it was working. If it wasn't I wouldn't have done any myself this way, nor would I mention doing it this way.