Chong's right. Double clutch downshifting does wear throw-out bearings - I killed one because of it.

And it does wear the clutch plate a bit more, but not too much more, because, although you're using it twice per gearchange, it's only got load from the input shaft of the gearbox for the extra time you're using it. And the odds are that your revs are better matched the second time you use the clutch (when you have engaged the gear and are reconnecting the engine to the road) than if you didn't rev-match (which is what you are trying to do when you double clutch).

So the question stands - do you want to repair a synchro a little less frequently, or the clutch more frequently?
Heal and toe is a technique which, whilst not being the same as double clutching (you can heal and toe without doubling the clutch), is the most effective way of double clutching, as double clutching, as discussed everywhere, whilst it can be done on upshifts, is mostly pointless. If you change fast enough, the gearbox's revs won't have dropped too far anyway. So Andbat, you may well be double clutching, but not doing heal and toe.
In terms of slowing a gearchange, that can work with a dying synchro. Synchros have an optimal speed for changes - even in a modern car it's possible to "beat" a synchro, to change gear so quickly that the synchro can't keep up and you crunch the gearset.

So slowing down your shift gives the synchro more time to work to match the gear speeds. I've had similar experiences, with Mini boxes and Commodore boxes.
For mine, the decision about double clutching is easy. I don't like the idea of taking the engine off the box - sounds like too much work!

The clutch isn't hard to fix (or get fixed). If one extra clutch gives you 25% more gearbox life, for mine it's probably worth it.

Others will disagree.

Plus, I learned to drive in a Commo with a mostly dead second gear synchro and a dying third gear synchro. I didn't have anyone to show me how to do it, and, although I'd read about it, I didn't fully understand how to do it until I saw someone do it - it was an old clip of someone in the 6 wheeled Tyrrell F1 car, and they showed his feet. There's a tip for anyone wanting to learn - pay attention next time they show a driver's feet on TV - unless of course they're showing how he's flat shifting... I've done the heal and toe ever since.

It sounds fantastic, it's part of the art of driving a car (a part that is now dying). I do rev the engine when the clutch is in, but that's purely to get it up towards where it needs to be when the car's in neutral - I start revving with the clutch in and let the clutch out before I hit the revs I want. Clutch back in, rev, then let clutch out with car in gear as the car gets to the revs I want, so I'm not revving the engine against the brakes. Oh, and although we say heel and toe, it's often more the ball of the foot on the brakes and the side of the foot on the accellerator - it's a bit hard and pointless to twist your leg that far! Although Cameron McConville once wrote that he did a CAMS test with someone (as the inspector) and the bloke used his heel on the brake and toe on the throttle, stopping from 200km/h in a Valiant!
