ausdino wrote:
68+86auto wrote:
I assume you measured the torque by removing them with a torque wrench. In that case the reading will be higher than the torque that they were done up to.
Actually, no. I adjusted the torque wrench to 60lbs/ft and foolishly tried to tighten. It clicked and none sheared.
That will do the same too although probably to less extent.
eightfifty wrote:
I also had this problem with my recent 850 gearbox rebuild, and had to get replacement "original" bolts from a nearby mini parts outlet and not do them up so tightly. In my case, I found my expensive Warren and Brown torque wrench was 10% in error when I checked it with a digital gauge. I don't know why, but I am not happy given that I thought I was buying the best. The wrench doesn't appear to be damaged and it has had little use.
Before purchasing a digital torque gauge , I tested my W&B torque wrench by clamping the square drive in a vise and then hanging a 20L drum of water off the handle. It is then an easy matter to calculate the actual torque applied (20 kg x the leverage arm length) and compare against the torque wrench setting. An interesting check to make and may alert you to something not right with the wrench. Rather surprisingly, my old Sidchrome torque wrench with the leaft spring indicator that snaps over a pin (some 50 years old) was spot on.
Is that W&B a deflecting beam like it sounds like the Sidchrome is? (an interesting point is actually that Sidchrome ones were made by both Warren & Brown and Ritch, yours probably being a Ritch)
The main benefit of them is actually consistency not accuracy although they should be close enough