Ausmini
It is currently Fri Jul 18, 2025 2:57 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 17 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: HELP
PostPosted: Thu Jan 05, 2006 10:10 pm 
Offline
848cc
848cc

Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2005 9:51 am
Posts: 15
I am not Java enabled so cant access the chat area. Can someone please tell me the pro and cons of the different suspension types on clubmans (fluid etc) and how to readily tell them apart from visual inspection.
Thanks


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jan 05, 2006 10:19 pm 
Offline
1360cc
1360cc
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2004 10:07 pm
Posts: 10653
Location: SE Melbourne
1. Don't bother with the chat area, it's about as busy as a lone star restaurant.
2. Can't be of and help with pros and cons, having never been in a hydro car.
3. On hydros, there will be a hose coming out of te top of the front suspension tower on each side that goes under the car towards the back.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jan 05, 2006 10:24 pm 
Offline
848cc
848cc

Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 12:00 am
Posts: 170
Location: Croydon Victoria
I am new to minis but I can tell you that my hydro mini K handles very well and the ride quality is most impressive for a small car. My dry clubbie handles well but the ride is nowhere near as good.

_________________
Mini K, 1310, Jet Red/Crystal White Roof, Rover Interior

75 Clubman


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jan 05, 2006 10:27 pm 
Offline
848cc
848cc

Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2005 9:51 am
Posts: 15
Cheers,
Now if somebody could extoll the virtues of each.....
I remember,but only just, a mate of mine when we left school bought a clubman(my god it must have been almost brand new) and I believe it had fluid. I remember it use to like.....stand up I guess, when you gave it some.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jan 05, 2006 10:39 pm 
Offline
1360cc
1360cc
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2004 10:07 pm
Posts: 10653
Location: SE Melbourne
AFAIK the reason the hydro handle better is they only allow suspension travel from front to back, and the car can't roll in corners. I guess the pros for the dry suspension is it is easier to work on, sice ulling apart to servive means you don't have to deflate the whole system.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 06, 2006 6:51 am 
Offline
Slow-Po
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2005 8:56 pm
Posts: 9979
When it comes to ride Hydro absorbs the small bumps / ruts in road better than the dry, with dry you can tell whether the coin you just ran over what a fifty or a twenty. :wink:

I have a dry car, however I would have prefered hydro.

_________________
One should never skimp on the zip ties.

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 06, 2006 6:58 am 
Offline
religious status
religious status
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 6:19 pm
Posts: 39754
Location: near Baulkham Hills, NSW
speedy wrote:
When it comes to ride Hydro absorbs the small bumps / ruts in road better than the dry, with dry you can tell whether the coin you just ran over what a fifty or a twenty. :wink:

I have a dry car, however I would have prefered hydro.

I've got both.
If you have a hydro pump I reckon the hydro front suspension is easier to work on than the dry. no cone puller needed, just let the fluid out...:)

_________________
DrMini- 1970 wasaMatic 1360, Mk1S crank, 86.6HP (ATW) =~125 @ crank, 45 Dellorto (38 chokes), RE282 sprint cam, 1.5 rockers, 11.0:1 C/R. :mrgreen:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 06, 2006 7:00 am 
Offline
Postally Verbose
Postally Verbose
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 02, 2006 9:12 am
Posts: 19595
Location: Northern NSW
I've had both and while they are both good , I prefer dry as it's easier to raise or lower yourself and less likely to fail and strand you somewhere . wet is a little more comfortable (unless you are lucky to find a Mk4 mini (softer rubber cones) with half a tonne of soundproofing that just cruises through the bumps , shouldn't have sold that one ......) but if you have a pipe or bag failure you end up driving home very very slowly looking like a drunk who needs to lean on the wall to stay upright . Wet was a good system in it's time but good bags are getting harder to find .

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Both
PostPosted: Fri Jan 06, 2006 7:49 am 
Offline
998cc
998cc

Joined: Mon Apr 05, 2004 11:23 am
Posts: 581
Location: Eastern Melbourne
Both are able to be tailored to suit your need. the Dry is lighter then the Wet and you can adjust each corner more independantly to the others.

Wet in std form is softer ride when new. New hehehe

OK on wet cars for a performance feel you can raise the std pressure by 20% (ill check the racing book on the number) and machine down the rod to attain a firm low ride. Put shockers on the front and a sway bar on the rear and things should handle well

Dry well the usual hieght adjust on the length of the cones and sway bar at the rear.

On both, neg camber on the front

There are heaps of books on suspension setups but either dry or hydro will still give you legendary mini handling


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 06, 2006 7:52 am 
Offline
848cc
848cc

Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2005 9:51 am
Posts: 15
excellent, that was what I kinda remembered from years ago and it was good to get all that clarified. Dry I think is the direction which I will go.
thanks again


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Fluid
PostPosted: Sat Jan 07, 2006 10:06 pm 
Offline
848cc
848cc
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 5:31 pm
Posts: 181
Location: Central Tilba NSW
Fluid is FANTASTIC

Blue

_________________
Keep shiny side up


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jan 08, 2006 12:07 am 
Offline
848cc
848cc

Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2004 1:17 pm
Posts: 207
Location: Adelaide
Dry is better. It wasn't cost that made them go back to dry.

smithy


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jan 08, 2006 12:33 am 
Offline
998cc
998cc
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 01, 2004 6:25 am
Posts: 891
Location: Sydney
Having both in my opinion dry is better for hard and fast driving as you know were you are with wet you have less connection with the road. Hydrolastic was removed from BMC/BMLC when Issigonis retired.

steve


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jan 08, 2006 7:22 am 
Offline
religious status
religious status
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 6:19 pm
Posts: 39754
Location: near Baulkham Hills, NSW
smithy wrote:
Dry is better. It wasn't cost that made them go back to dry.

smithy

That's not the accepted story as told by BMC/Leyland historians..
Cooper S production in UK stayed wet for years after the rest went dry, so they could continue to win rallies etc... :wink:
Let's face it- when a dry Mini `gets air' all its suspension linkage is just hanging loose... waiting for the crash landing!! 8)

I got both, but love the wet one! :wink:

_________________
DrMini- 1970 wasaMatic 1360, Mk1S crank, 86.6HP (ATW) =~125 @ crank, 45 Dellorto (38 chokes), RE282 sprint cam, 1.5 rockers, 11.0:1 C/R. :mrgreen:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Help
PostPosted: Sun Jan 08, 2006 7:46 am 
Offline
848cc
848cc
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 5:31 pm
Posts: 181
Location: Central Tilba NSW
A dry suspension car is like riding in a billycart with steel wheels, very harsh.
You can improve a hydro equipped car by converting it to fully independend
hydro & adding shockies to each corner.
The last of the MGs had this system (correct me if I'm wrong)

Blue

_________________
Keep shiny side up


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 17 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: drmini in aust and 83 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

© 2016 Ausmini. All garage work involves equal measures of enthusiasm, ingenuity and a fair degree of irresponsibility.