Ausmini
It is currently Sun Aug 17, 2025 2:54 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Undersize brake rotor's
PostPosted: Fri Nov 24, 2006 6:08 pm 
Offline
848cc
848cc

Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 4:16 pm
Posts: 23
Location: Churchill Vic
What are the ramifications of having undersize rotors. Minimum thickness is 8.5mm, and currently running 7.5. This is on my 1275LS.
Cheers Ron


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: brake rotors
PostPosted: Fri Nov 24, 2006 6:17 pm 
Offline
998cc
998cc
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2006 10:31 pm
Posts: 595
Location: Brisbane
less efficient braking and voiding of insurance


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Nov 24, 2006 6:18 pm 
Offline
Postally Verbose
Postally Verbose
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 02, 2006 9:12 am
Posts: 19595
Location: Northern NSW
Not entirely sure of the physical ramifications (cracking etc) but the legal ramifications are BIG , if you have a prang and they're found to be under the minimum allowed then you're basically screwed , the insurance company will laugh at you while tearing up the policy and if anyones injured or killed then the charges increase in severity .

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Nov 24, 2006 6:25 pm 
Offline
848cc
848cc

Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 4:16 pm
Posts: 23
Location: Churchill Vic
Well its just as well she's up on block waiting for rotor's


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Nov 24, 2006 6:29 pm 
Offline
religious status
religious status
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 6:19 pm
Posts: 39764
Location: near Baulkham Hills, NSW
I believe the 8.5mm stated is a machining limit, not the minimum you can legally run them to.
I have also seen some S rotors with 8mm stamped on them.

I ran my old S ones down to 7mm and they still stopped OK.
Cooper 998 ones are only 6.35mm (1/4" ) thick NEW, if you think 7.5mm is thin. :lol:

_________________
DrMini- 1970 wasaMatic 1360, Mk1S crank, 86.6HP (ATW) =~125 @ crank, 45 Dellorto (38 chokes), RE282 sprint cam, 1.5 rockers, 11.0:1 C/R. :mrgreen:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Nov 24, 2006 7:08 pm 
Offline
Causing or creating vexation

Joined: Wed Jul 21, 2004 10:32 pm
Posts: 19124
The funny thing about minimum thickness for discs is that I can't find anything from BMC or Leyland stating what the minimums are.
Nobody really worried about minimums for any discs (or oversize drums) till the late 80s, but now they go overboard with them.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: rotors
PostPosted: Fri Nov 24, 2006 8:01 pm 
Offline
998cc
998cc
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2006 10:31 pm
Posts: 595
Location: Brisbane
Dept of transport in Qld must have limits as I have been failed with 8mm rotors on the Moke Californian, same rotors as the LS. The info I have found on them states they are 10mm new and minimum of 8.5mm and when I put new rotors on, they were stamped along the edge as 8.5mm minimum machining thickness, the same applied to the 'S' rotors I got earlier this year. The improvement in the Moke braking was very noticeable with the 10mm thick rotors.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Suck it and see
PostPosted: Fri Nov 24, 2006 9:36 pm 
Offline
1360cc
1360cc
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2004 11:32 am
Posts: 12390
Location: Sthrn HiLoLands, NSW, Australia
Morris 1100 wrote:
The funny thing about minimum thickness for discs is that I can't find anything from BMC or Leyland stating what the minimums are.
Nobody really worried about minimums for any discs (or oversize drums) till the late 80s, but now they go overboard with them.


With some calipers you can jamb the pistons if they extend too far....is this likely to be a problem taking the rotor below 7.5mm, more towards the Docs 6.35mm :?:

_________________
"Show me the Mini!"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Suck it and see
PostPosted: Fri Nov 24, 2006 9:58 pm 
Offline
religious status
religious status
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 6:19 pm
Posts: 39764
Location: near Baulkham Hills, NSW
9YaTaH wrote:
Morris 1100 wrote:
The funny thing about minimum thickness for discs is that I can't find anything from BMC or Leyland stating what the minimums are.
Nobody really worried about minimums for any discs (or oversize drums) till the late 80s, but now they go overboard with them.


With some calipers you can jamb the pistons if they extend too far....is this likely to be a problem taking the rotor below 7.5mm, more towards the Docs 6.35mm :?:

I have seen a pad FALL OUT of a Fiat 125 floating caliper due to undersize rotors.. the pad's backplate (its facing was gone) fell out between disc and pad bracket.. then the piston hit the rotor.
Physically this can't occur with Mini opposed piston calipers, but it's an example of the perils of using dodgy brakes.

_________________
DrMini- 1970 wasaMatic 1360, Mk1S crank, 86.6HP (ATW) =~125 @ crank, 45 Dellorto (38 chokes), RE282 sprint cam, 1.5 rockers, 11.0:1 C/R. :mrgreen:


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 316 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

© 2016 Ausmini. All garage work involves equal measures of enthusiasm, ingenuity and a fair degree of irresponsibility.