Ausmini
It is currently Mon Jul 21, 2025 9:21 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 11 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Nov 14, 2007 8:09 am 
Offline
1098cc
1098cc
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 16, 2004 10:39 pm
Posts: 1629
Location: Sydney, E. Burbs
When fitting the adjustable tie bars a few months ago I also added the mini spares recomended poly bushes on the outside and regular rubber units on the inside. The suspension guy who set the camber/cast. insisted that doing the tie bar end nut all the way to a point where the bushes seemed very compressed was neccesary.

Now just a few months later the rubber tie bar bushes are worn out and about to perish (poly still alright). Any possible causes?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 14, 2007 8:16 am 
Offline
This space for rent
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2007 12:40 pm
Posts: 5455
Location: Melbourne
I have a set of those on my car, and I didn't tighten them up quite that far. I have them with a slight bulge in the polyurethane bush, which doesn't deform the rubber one too badly at all.

There's still plenty of tension on the nyloc nut, so there's no risk of it coming undone...

_________________
Simon

The adventures of an owner builder in the Tallarook Ranges

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 14, 2007 11:54 pm 
Offline
1098cc
1098cc
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 16, 2004 10:39 pm
Posts: 1629
Location: Sydney, E. Burbs
Well I always did my up to tight but not all the way but when getting the adjustable tie bars the suspension guy insisted it has to be done all the way to the end - I had a problem with that as the bushes were distorting and I thought the lock nut is there so that you wont have to do it all the way - but he's supposed to be the expert - any deffinitive opinions?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 15, 2007 5:53 am 
Offline
religious status
religious status
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 6:19 pm
Posts: 39755
Location: near Baulkham Hills, NSW
The tiebar is designed for the nut to be done right up, with the original rubber bushes. The nut is nyloc so it won't come loose, not to allow adjustment.
Another prob with poly is if you fit a full set and tighten up, you can bend the tiebar as it's too flimsy for the stiff poly bushes..
Personally I've had more joy with rubber bushes there than poly- same goes for the lower arm inner mount. Cheaper too.:wink:

_________________
DrMini- 1970 wasaMatic 1360, Mk1S crank, 86.6HP (ATW) =~125 @ crank, 45 Dellorto (38 chokes), RE282 sprint cam, 1.5 rockers, 11.0:1 C/R. :mrgreen:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 15, 2007 6:13 am 
Offline
1360cc
1360cc
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2004 7:23 am
Posts: 7339
Location: Sunny Shine Coast, Qld Australia
drmini in aust wrote:
The tiebar is designed for the nut to be done right up, with the original rubber bushes. The nut is nyloc so it won't come loose, not to allow adjustment.


Hmmmmm..........The ones on the car when I got it (the bent ones :roll: ) had an ordinary nut and a hole through the rod with a split pin to stop the nut coming off. :shock: - guess I'd better get some nylocs :?

_________________
David L
Image

My greatest fear in life is that when I die my wife will sell my Mini and tools for the price I told her I paid for them!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 15, 2007 6:33 am 
Offline
1098cc
1098cc
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2005 1:03 pm
Posts: 1540
Location: Napier, NZ
Anyone ever done the math to figure out how many threads equals what effect on caster?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 15, 2007 6:39 am 
Offline
1098cc
1098cc
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 16, 2004 10:39 pm
Posts: 1629
Location: Sydney, E. Burbs
drmini in aust wrote:
The tiebar is designed for the nut to be done right up, with the original rubber bushes. The nut is nyloc so it won't come loose, not to allow adjustment.
Another prob with poly is if you fit a full set and tighten up, you can bend the tiebar as it's too flimsy for the stiff poly bushes..
Personally I've had more joy with rubber bushes there than poly- same goes for the lower arm inner mount. Cheaper too.:wink:


Doc, theyre minispares adjustable arms (heavy duty double thickness too) so I used a the poly bush on the outside and a rubber bush on the inside as per the minispares instructions - just didn't expect the bush to perish so quickly.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 15, 2007 7:54 am 
Offline
This space for rent
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2007 12:40 pm
Posts: 5455
Location: Melbourne
Mike wrote:
Doc, theyre minispares adjustable arms (heavy duty double thickness too) so I used a the poly bush on the outside and a rubber bush on the inside as per the minispares instructions - just didn't expect the bush to perish so quickly.


You've fitted them correctly, I just think your suspension guy has done them up too tight. The bushes are there to control suspension movement under acceleration and braking (hence the reason for the polyurethane outer bush, it's much firmer than rubber and won't deform as easily, reducing directional instability under heavy braking).

There's no point in doing them up as tight as you can -- once they're tight enough to control the suspension you get no benefit in going any tighter; all you're going to do is deform the bushes and reduce their lifespan.

The nyloc nut (or split pin, I've seen that done too) will prevent anything coming undone, so there's no need to put 100 ft-lb's on it :roll:

_________________
Simon

The adventures of an owner builder in the Tallarook Ranges

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 15, 2007 12:11 pm 
Offline
998cc
998cc
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 2:05 pm
Posts: 1084
Location: Manly NSW
I'll be doing this on my car soon, with exactly the same parts. I'll let you know how I get on at the suspension set-up shop.

_________________
'98 Mpi Sportspack + 7 port alloy head


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Nov 16, 2007 6:13 am 
Offline
998cc
998cc
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 18, 2006 4:57 am
Posts: 515
Location: Hamburg, Germany
sgc wrote:
so there's no need to put 100 ft-lb's on it :roll:


all manuals i own:
torque wrench setting: tie-rod to subframe 30 Nm / 22 lbf/ft

_________________
Rover 214 atm ....


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Nov 16, 2007 8:20 am 
Offline
This space for rent
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2007 12:40 pm
Posts: 5455
Location: Melbourne
KLAS wrote:
sgc wrote:
so there's no need to put 100 ft-lb's on it :roll:


all manuals i own:
torque wrench setting: tie-rod to subframe 30 Nm / 22 lbf/ft


Yeah, I was just illustrating that it's not necessary to wind them up as tight as they can go ;)

_________________
Simon

The adventures of an owner builder in the Tallarook Ranges

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 11 posts ] 

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 74 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

© 2016 Ausmini. All garage work involves equal measures of enthusiasm, ingenuity and a fair degree of irresponsibility.