Ausmini
It is currently Sat Aug 02, 2025 8:51 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Sep 21, 2008 8:15 pm 
Offline
998cc
998cc

Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2005 3:10 pm
Posts: 891
Location: Brisbane, West Siiede
Hi all
Just looking at some breaks - is there a noticeable difference between 7.5s and 8.4s i have 12 inch wheels so dont mind either way but ones cheaper
Thanks


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Sep 21, 2008 8:21 pm 
Offline
1360cc
1360cc
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2004 10:07 pm
Posts: 10654
Location: SE Melbourne
Generally speaking, you qwant the biggest brakes under you wheels you can get.
If there's not much cost difference, go the 7.5s.
If you had 13s I'd say go the 8.4s.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Sep 21, 2008 8:24 pm 
Offline
998cc
998cc

Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2005 3:10 pm
Posts: 891
Location: Brisbane, West Siiede
atm 8.4s are more $$$s


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Sep 21, 2008 8:24 pm 
Offline
1275cc
1275cc
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 24, 2007 7:19 pm
Posts: 5370
Location: Yandina,Sunshine Coast,QLD
In theory (and correct me if I'm wrong) if they both have the same pads/surface area and calipers, the 7.5's as they are closer to the center of rotation so the disc is spinning slower BUT more force will be needed so it might cancel itself out :? .
8.4's probably have more upgrade options and could be cheaper as more were produced as standard on minis than the 7.5's.

_________________
Respect mine and I'll respect yours.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Sep 21, 2008 8:28 pm 
Offline
This space for rent
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2007 12:40 pm
Posts: 5455
Location: Melbourne
Kenno, with the 8.4's the centre of pressure exerted by the pads is on a larger diameter circle than with 7.5's, which means they are more effective for any given pressure of application. This is also true of 4-piston calipers on the same diameter discs (albeit not as great a difference as 7.5->8.4) which explains why they're generally better than 2-potters.

_________________
Simon

The adventures of an owner builder in the Tallarook Ranges

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Sep 21, 2008 9:48 pm 
Offline
848cc
848cc
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2006 11:04 am
Posts: 441
Location: Brisbane
SGC is correct, however unless you have weak legs the ultimate breaking force is limited by the tires and not the brake...

IMO the reason for changing brakes is brake fade and probably only a problem in racing applications.
This is because all the stored (kinetic) energy in the car (ie great hulk of fast moving steel) is transferred to heat via the brakes. After numerous quick stops the brakes soon get pretty hot (think glowing red on the bathurst V8's...) and there efficiency drops because of this and eventually they won't work at all

- Stock drums are pretty poor with this fade, but can be made pretty good especially for light cars like mini's by using better shoe material and alloy drums and a few other tricks

- Next up is your disks which generally have better heat dissipation in standard form then you can go up to vented disks which are even better

Other factors like cross drilling, slotting, pad material, un-sprung weight etc. need to be considered when changing brakes...
I could probably talk for days on this but I'll stop myself...


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 81 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

© 2016 Ausmini. All garage work involves equal measures of enthusiasm, ingenuity and a fair degree of irresponsibility.