Austin850 wrote:
When I wired it up, the inductance loop wires are joined to the coil (side not attached directly to the dizzy) and the switched power.
Yep, that's how I had mine wired, and it worked perfectly (for a short while).
Austin850 wrote:
In the new diagram that I found, the inductance loop wires are joined to the dizzy and the coil so that it is basically wired in line between the two.
I've seen that version around the traps as well. From a signal point of view I'm not sure it makes a great deal of difference which way it's wired, except perhaps that the tacho sensitivity (i.e. the number of coils in the inductive pickup) might vary between the two. The trigger frequency will be the same in either case.
My installation involved a 123 electronic distributor, which from some accounts causes the coil to discharge more fully than a points dizzy (and therefore induce a deeper charge cycle). In this case, the account I read suggested that the magnitude of the charge current would cause saturation in the inductive pickup of the tach causing it to over-read, but like I said mine worked perfectly while it worked at all.
Is yours the external loop version, or internal? If external, you may be able to increase the tach's sensitivity by looping the signal wire around the core again.