Ausmini
It is currently Tue Aug 12, 2025 7:45 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 54 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: best bang for your buck
PostPosted: Thu Jan 14, 2010 11:46 am 
Offline
848cc
848cc
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 27, 2007 10:09 pm
Posts: 33
Location: Sydney
hey guys

just after some advice on carbies, i am in need of upgrading my old 1 1/2' as i hav had ongoing problems with it. i am looking into twin 1 3/4 SUs, assuming that they are bigger are they the best performance wise? i have a rebuilt 1275cc engine.

what is the primary comparison between Webers and SUs??

Thanks


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jan 14, 2010 11:52 am 
Offline
1360cc
1360cc
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2004 7:23 am
Posts: 7339
Location: Sunny Shine Coast, Qld Australia
I thought this was about Veterans cutting their Viagra tabs in half :roll:

_________________
David L
Image

My greatest fear in life is that when I die my wife will sell my Mini and tools for the price I told her I paid for them!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jan 14, 2010 11:57 am 
Offline
1275cc
1275cc
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2008 2:34 pm
Posts: 2002
Location: Brisbane
Carbs on their own will not give you any extra performance. All they will do is give you the potential to have more performance.

The performance gained is in the manifold.
So whatever carb you use dont bung it on a dodgy manifold.

And twin 1 3/4s would be a bit big for a stock 1275.

_________________
Simplify and add lightness


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jan 14, 2010 11:58 am 
Offline
848cc
848cc
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 27, 2007 10:09 pm
Posts: 33
Location: Sydney
but will it increase the power if i am upgrading from a single to a twin setup?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jan 14, 2010 12:01 pm 
Offline
Milatsmadmini
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2007 6:57 pm
Posts: 6287
Location: the inner west of sydeney!
best bet would be the standard twin 1 1/4's, or if your head has had enough work done to it, twin 1 1/2's.... that'll get it up and going... :wink:

twin 1 3/4's are a little too big for a daily car, more left for the fully fledged track eaters...

_________________
Here am I sitting in my tin can far above the Moon
Planet Earth is blue and there's nothing I can do...



“A turbo: exhaust gasses go into the turbocharger and spin it, witchcraft happens and you go faster.” - Jeremy Clarkson


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jan 14, 2010 12:04 pm 
Offline
1275cc
1275cc
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2008 2:34 pm
Posts: 2002
Location: Brisbane
It depends on the intake manifold.

If you have a single on a really well flowing manifold, then put the twins on a cheapy chinese manifold you lose power and drivability.

Likewise if your using a stock single inlet manifold and upgrade to a twin carb performance one you will see more power.
But it wont be because of the extra carb.

_________________
Simplify and add lightness


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jan 14, 2010 12:11 pm 
Offline
848cc
848cc
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 10, 2004 1:04 pm
Posts: 208
Location: Blue Mountains - home of the mushrooms
assuming your primary consideration is performance?

what other work has been done to the motor? or what are you planning?

Why has no one mentioned weber/dellorto? Carbies of kings...

_________________
--Insert legal disclaimer here--


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jan 14, 2010 12:17 pm 
Offline
1098cc
1098cc
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2009 11:28 pm
Posts: 1550
Yeah, I would agree... twin 1 3/4" probably a bit full on for a roadie..

The manifold does come into play a bit (but so does the head and rest of the motor and where and how you will be driving it most of the time), you want one that meets the demands of the motor, if it doesn't flow enough then you just rob yourself of potential power the whole way up the rev range but particularly as you reach the top.

As far as differences between Webers and SU's, well, the difference between a HIF44 and a 45DCOE is that (if everything is in order) you might get an extra 5hp out of a weber at the top end of the rev range... but with an SU, you will get more torque at lower rpm...

Webers can be tuned to run economically, but even so they are thirster than an SU... but they do sound awesome 8)

For a hot 1275 for the road I would suggest maybe a set 2X1 1/4" SU's, a HIF44 or 2X1 1/2" SU's...

But as was pointed out by Gareth_1330,, it depends on what has been done to the motor


Last edited by Phat Kat on Thu Jan 14, 2010 12:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jan 14, 2010 12:28 pm 
Offline
848cc
848cc
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 27, 2007 10:09 pm
Posts: 33
Location: Sydney
well i havnt heard to much difference between the webers/dellortos to SUs

but an extra 5hp doesnt justify modifying the firewall...

the engine has an oversized cam with electronic dizzy rebored to 1310cc has been runny badly since built because of the carby and want this justified finally only thing is which way to swing


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jan 14, 2010 12:38 pm 
Offline
1098cc
1098cc
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2009 11:28 pm
Posts: 1550
they used HIF44's on everything from the high compresion 998 Metro HLE thru to the Metro Turbo,, so I reckon for a roadie that they are a safe bet...

As far as far as manifolds for them go, I normaly use the MG Metro manifold as they perform better than some of the after market ones. But they are getting hard to find.

What ever you settle on, get the car dyno tuned or you wil never get the most out of it


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jan 14, 2010 12:48 pm 
Offline
1360cc
1360cc
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 08, 2004 9:01 pm
Posts: 6844
Location: Cairns, Nrth QLD
Single 1 1/2 or 1 3/4 if its a stock 1275!!!!

_________________
Image
http://www.youtube.com/user/Hanras


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jan 14, 2010 1:09 pm 
Offline
1275cc
1275cc
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 5:03 pm
Posts: 2729
Location: Out in the shed cleaning up my own mess.
Hanra wrote:
Single 1 1/2 or 1 3/4 if its a stock 1275!!!!


I agree with some reservation.

I just love the sight of a couple of big jugs! :) :D :lol:

_________________
1967 Cooper S - new front bearings to do.
1965 Cooper S shell - Slow progress. No time or money!
1966 Deluxe- next rustoration!
Mk 2 & XJ6 Jags. Less said the better.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jan 14, 2010 1:19 pm 
Offline
1360cc
1360cc
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 03, 2005 1:41 pm
Posts: 12311
Location: Rockingham - Collie WA
Big single 1 3/4 works well & is easy to tune, at a much better cost than twins.

_________________
Too many cars, and too little time.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jan 14, 2010 1:57 pm 
Offline
848cc
848cc
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 27, 2007 10:09 pm
Posts: 33
Location: Sydney
thanks guys

the guys running SUs have you had running problems and problems tunning?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jan 14, 2010 2:08 pm 
Offline
848cc
848cc
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 06, 2009 9:51 pm
Posts: 141
Location: Brisvagas
If an SU of any type is in good condition and set up properly for the motor its on, it will run fine. Getting said carb set up shouldn't be a major drama. Twins are a bit more involved but the same applies. What problems are you having with your HS4?

cheers

Kevin


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 54 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 248 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

© 2016 Ausmini. All garage work involves equal measures of enthusiasm, ingenuity and a fair degree of irresponsibility.