drmini in aust wrote:
PK, if you read up on nitriding it puts the surface layers of the metal in compression, thus increasing fatigue resistance. That is why they nitrided the whole crank.
see
http://7faq.com/owbase/ow.asp?SurfaceHardeningOfSteel scroll down to `nitriding'.

I like this part
Quote:
The depth of case produced by nitriding is relatively limited but as the core material is of high strength this does not cause any practical problems.
And just to drive home the point that a hard, stiff surface on a crank is undesireable
Quote:
Care is needed when selecting materials. EN41B may be considered better as the surface will be harder than EN40B treated in the same manner BUT the surface of EN41B becomes so hard that it will not tolerate any point loads or bending without cracking.
Alrighty, back to the point you were making, I have read this (the relevant part of that link)....
http://7faq.com/owbase/ow.asp?SurfaceHardeningOfSteel wrote:
There is an expansion of the surface caused by the development of the nitride layer and this creates large compressive stresses. These compressive stresses create a very significant increase in surface hardness (potentially 1000Hv) and also cause a significant improvement in fatigue strength. (It is obvious to develop a crack tensile forces must be present and if residual surface compressive stresses are generated then the superimposed stress caused by operation must first overcome the compressive stress before a tensile component can cause damage)
What is says there is correct. It effectively raises the UTS (of the nitrided case

).
They also reckon that nitriding increases corrosion resistance, but I've seen plenty of rusty nitrided dies. "Resistance", not proofing.
I suspect, (and I says suspect, I don't know for sure off the top of my head but will look into it and let you know) that as is the case with the idea that its a "rust proofing", that yes, there is a measurable difference in tensile strength, but its not as dramatic as the improvement in surface hardness... It might only be a few Mpa... I don't know I'll have a look and come back.
The reason I tend to think that any difference it makes to fatigue life is low(ish), is just because there are other mechanical components about the place that require an increase in fatigue, yet you don't see people rushing it nitride them as a cure. You really only see nitriding where wear resistance is the desired effect. Its only ever really used where you are trying to improve the life of a surface subject to high temps and high levels of friction..... (and I'm obviously not just looking at automotive applications for nitriding either).
<edit> sorry, just to put it another way... we're talking about a 12kg crank, with 2ish" ( whatever I'm just saying) bearings.... even if the first 0.020-0.030" had a tensile strength of 2000 Mpa (EN40B has a tensile strength of around 900Mpa),,,,, is that 0.025" reeeeeally going to make that much of a difference to a 2" bearing? I'm just thinking out loud.