Ausmini
It is currently Mon Jul 14, 2025 9:14 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 221 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 ... 15  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Jan 27, 2011 12:47 pm 
Offline
1275cc
1275cc
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 02, 2009 4:53 pm
Posts: 3135
Location: Port Stephens, a little north of Newcastle, Australia
cometcosmo2003 wrote:
Hi there,

That second jump is the valve bouncing/floating all over the place out of control, and you can see all the vibrations from this reverberating through the whole valve train assembly.

Cheers
AH Huh!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jan 27, 2011 4:12 pm 
Offline
Mods rock!
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 03, 2008 9:02 pm
Posts: 5079
TheMiniMan wrote:


the cranks we had tested for hardening depth years ago (my dad did this when i was a kid) & worked with "Heat-treatment" up here in Brisbane --> the hardening would go about 15-18thou deep, & also found it to be very uneven through the crank,,, but if we left the crank in the center of the tank, for the whole weekend, the depth increased to 25-30thou & was more even thickness right through the crank


Matt, a couple of quick (if there is such a thing) questions;-

What type of 'hardening' did these cranks have?
What type of 'hardening' did you dad do (or did he have it done)?

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jan 27, 2011 5:03 pm 
Offline
Causing or creating vexation

Joined: Wed Jul 21, 2004 10:32 pm
Posts: 19124
TheMiniMan wrote:
can i tell you a story???

when i was a young fella, i`d rip down to Byron Bay surfing (nothing`s changed there) & a mate of mine (Troy Story) had an old ex-army EJ holden Ute & we`d hop in that thing & fang it everywhere, but,,, we`d pin it hard as we could all the way to Lennox Head (when the surf was good at Lennox obviously) & it would crunch gears in every gear, it would leak oil everywhere, fume like a smelter, it was just crap, the whole car was just stuffed , but it just kept running

However,,, what surprised me the most was---> (now read this the right way if you may) that it would struggle (like any engine does) at valve float point,,, then struggle & complain at valve bounce (like they all do) & while i was waiting for a valve head to pop off & smash the entire engine to bits (The noise was deafening & giving me goose bumps,,, i was always waiting for that inevitable long walk home),,,, i was cringing the whole time , but Troy would always say "Trust me" & kept his foot in,,,, well,,,, the thing would suddenly smooth up, quiet-en right up, & then "SING" & continue to rev to the moon, smooth as silk, quiet as a mouse,,, it was like Magic

it went past/through that valve bounce harmonic & proceed to accelerate up to the next harmonic zone (which happened to be about 8500-9000rpms

now this was an old 138 side-plate grey motor & i`m not kidding you, it went fast!!!!!!

now i would never suggest to anyone to fit softer springs than needed, because it`s simply asking for a catastrophic failure with regards to valves &/or springs breaking,,, but this car & it`s ability to rev past valve bounce (SSOOOOOOooooo Many times over a 10 year period) & it`s sweet smoothness after said harmonic,,, really woke me up & made me look harder at valves , valve springs & engine harmonics

Moral of the story,,,, you`ll never know if you never go

The old grey motors had a bad harmonic period at certain revs. They used to break cranks at those revs.

The speedway blokes knew all about it and geared their cars to run above the harmonic period where the circuit blokes usually had to drive through it.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jan 27, 2011 5:56 pm 
Offline
1098cc
1098cc

Joined: Mon Feb 12, 2007 2:40 pm
Posts: 1325
Location: wasleys S.A.
The grey motor critical RPM's were 3,200 and 6,400 and if you released the clutch on those revs the the cranks would crack if you were lucky or just toss a leg out of bed.
I busted quite a few when I started racing my morry minor, but the red motors were better but never as good as a 302 windsor.

_________________
Research is the difference between speculation and investment. Anyone who copys some one else will always be second
www.minisprintgt.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jan 27, 2011 6:25 pm 
Offline
1098cc
1098cc

Joined: Mon Feb 12, 2007 2:40 pm
Posts: 1325
Location: wasleys S.A.
GT mowog wrote:
TheMiniMan wrote:


the cranks we had tested for hardening depth years ago (my dad did this when i was a kid) & worked with "Heat-treatment" up here in Brisbane --> the hardening would go about 15-18thou deep, & also found it to be very uneven through the crank,,, but if we left the crank in the center of the tank, for the whole weekend, the depth increased to 25-30thou & was more even thickness right through the crank


Matt, a couple of quick (if there is such a thing) questions;-

What type of 'hardening' did these cranks have?
What type of 'hardening' did you dad do (or did he have it done)?


when I was working at rev-master we used a combination of sodium cyinide and potassium nitrate for the case hardening and sodium chloride for the tempering .
When we made the billet cranks the base metal was either Q10 or L7 ,[a spring steel compound] these metals had a high resistance to twisting, but if they were hardened over the complete surface then they would become brittle and suffered from surface cracking.
The wearing surfaces were only hardened. The cranks were coated with a asbestos refractory compound with the wear surfaces exposed then immersed in the salt bath.
Very hard overall is not good ,imagine a crank made of tool steel

_________________
Research is the difference between speculation and investment. Anyone who copys some one else will always be second
www.minisprintgt.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jan 27, 2011 7:12 pm 
Offline
Mods rock!
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 03, 2008 9:02 pm
Posts: 5079
Thanks David.

Considering the necessity for the crank to be flexible and resist fatigue from said flexing, it does make good sence to make the cranks from L7 (and Q10). The surface embrittlement you mention and subsequent surface cracking, I have seen with nitrided cranks - done wrong. These days they tend to do plasma nitriding to localise the application of the nitride to where you want it. Considering why nitriding is actually done, a skin of 5 to 8 thousands would be quite sufficent.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jan 27, 2011 7:58 pm 
Offline
1098cc
1098cc
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2009 11:28 pm
Posts: 1550
david rosenthal wrote:
GT mowog wrote:
TheMiniMan wrote:


the cranks we had tested for hardening depth years ago (my dad did this when i was a kid) & worked with "Heat-treatment" up here in Brisbane --> the hardening would go about 15-18thou deep, & also found it to be very uneven through the crank,,, but if we left the crank in the center of the tank, for the whole weekend, the depth increased to 25-30thou & was more even thickness right through the crank


Matt, a couple of quick (if there is such a thing) questions;-

What type of 'hardening' did these cranks have?
What type of 'hardening' did you dad do (or did he have it done)?


when I was working at rev-master we used a combination of sodium cyinide and potassium nitrate for the case hardening and sodium chloride for the tempering .
When we made the billet cranks the base metal was either Q10 or L7 ,[a spring steel compound] these metals had a high resistance to twisting, but if they were hardened over the complete surface then they would become brittle and suffered from surface cracking.
The wearing surfaces were only hardened. The cranks were coated with a asbestos refractory compound with the wear surfaces exposed then immersed in the salt bath.
Very hard overall is not good ,imagine a crank made of tool steel


Awww, here I was thinking that a nice big ol' lump of Stavex would make a great material for machining a crank out of :D

Not to be a twat at you David :) buuuuuuuuuuuuuuut you know that Technically L7 is a tool steel (or at least its listed in the tool steel chats) :mrgreen: But what you have said is correct, high resistance to wearing and twisting. ER collets are made out of it. I was looking at using L7 for a particular application in regards to a particular job we may have spoken about ;) and now that you mention it, it would be well suited to this application too. It even has slightly better Mechanical properties than EN40B (for use as a crankshaft). Its more ductile (less likely to crack) and just a bit more elastic. You can get EN40B harder, but as we've already discussed, that isn't necessarily desireable in this application.

You mentioned the same thing I was thinking David regarding only hardening the journels. The reason for nitriding bearing surfaces, is to increase wear resistance..... so why would you need to increase the wear resistance of the webs which don't make contact with anything :lol: Its not needed and is asking for trouble.

Really there is no real benefit getting them too hard anyway. You can get L7 to 65(ish) HRc, thats fine for this job.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jan 27, 2011 8:09 pm 
Offline
religious status
religious status
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 6:19 pm
Posts: 39754
Location: near Baulkham Hills, NSW
PK, if you read up on nitriding it puts the surface layers of the metal in compression, thus increasing fatigue resistance. That is why they nitrided the whole crank.
see http://7faq.com/owbase/ow.asp?SurfaceHardeningOfSteel
scroll down to `nitriding'. :wink:

_________________
DrMini- 1970 wasaMatic 1360, Mk1S crank, 86.6HP (ATW) =~125 @ crank, 45 Dellorto (38 chokes), RE282 sprint cam, 1.5 rockers, 11.0:1 C/R. :mrgreen:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jan 27, 2011 9:16 pm 
Offline
1275cc
1275cc
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 02, 2009 4:53 pm
Posts: 3135
Location: Port Stephens, a little north of Newcastle, Australia
I think piston speed done this.

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jan 27, 2011 10:06 pm 
Offline
1098cc
1098cc
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2009 11:28 pm
Posts: 1550
drmini in aust wrote:
PK, if you read up on nitriding it puts the surface layers of the metal in compression, thus increasing fatigue resistance. That is why they nitrided the whole crank.
see http://7faq.com/owbase/ow.asp?SurfaceHardeningOfSteel
scroll down to `nitriding'. :wink:



I like this part :)

Quote:
The depth of case produced by nitriding is relatively limited but as the core material is of high strength this does not cause any practical problems.



And just to drive home the point that a hard, stiff surface on a crank is undesireable

Quote:
Care is needed when selecting materials. EN41B may be considered better as the surface will be harder than EN40B treated in the same manner BUT the surface of EN41B becomes so hard that it will not tolerate any point loads or bending without cracking.



Alrighty, back to the point you were making, I have read this (the relevant part of that link)....


http://7faq.com/owbase/ow.asp?SurfaceHardeningOfSteel wrote:
There is an expansion of the surface caused by the development of the nitride layer and this creates large compressive stresses. These compressive stresses create a very significant increase in surface hardness (potentially 1000Hv) and also cause a significant improvement in fatigue strength. (It is obvious to develop a crack tensile forces must be present and if residual surface compressive stresses are generated then the superimposed stress caused by operation must first overcome the compressive stress before a tensile component can cause damage)


What is says there is correct. It effectively raises the UTS (of the nitrided case :wink: ).


They also reckon that nitriding increases corrosion resistance, but I've seen plenty of rusty nitrided dies. "Resistance", not proofing.

I suspect, (and I says suspect, I don't know for sure off the top of my head but will look into it and let you know) that as is the case with the idea that its a "rust proofing", that yes, there is a measurable difference in tensile strength, but its not as dramatic as the improvement in surface hardness... It might only be a few Mpa... I don't know I'll have a look and come back.

The reason I tend to think that any difference it makes to fatigue life is low(ish), is just because there are other mechanical components about the place that require an increase in fatigue, yet you don't see people rushing it nitride them as a cure. You really only see nitriding where wear resistance is the desired effect. Its only ever really used where you are trying to improve the life of a surface subject to high temps and high levels of friction..... (and I'm obviously not just looking at automotive applications for nitriding either).

<edit> sorry, just to put it another way... we're talking about a 12kg crank, with 2ish" ( whatever I'm just saying) bearings.... even if the first 0.020-0.030" had a tensile strength of 2000 Mpa (EN40B has a tensile strength of around 900Mpa),,,,, is that 0.025" reeeeeally going to make that much of a difference to a 2" bearing? I'm just thinking out loud.


Last edited by Phat Kat on Thu Jan 27, 2011 11:20 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jan 27, 2011 10:42 pm 
Offline
1098cc
1098cc

Joined: Mon Feb 12, 2007 2:40 pm
Posts: 1325
Location: wasleys S.A.
MG Rocket wrote:
I think piston speed done this.

Image


holy mother of god, that's not piston speed just piston shambles

_________________
Research is the difference between speculation and investment. Anyone who copys some one else will always be second
www.minisprintgt.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jan 27, 2011 10:48 pm 
Offline
1275cc
1275cc
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 7:56 pm
Posts: 2663
Location: Muswellbrook -- NSW
That is a CLASSIC photo, wholly crap!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jan 27, 2011 11:01 pm 
Offline
1098cc
1098cc

Joined: Mon Feb 12, 2007 2:40 pm
Posts: 1325
Location: wasleys S.A.
Ok valve springs :) :) :) we have some interesting points raised, but one of the things we do in assesment of a particular problem or design is a process called a "tap root assesment" just a pig iron polisher term.
now we all know there are problems with valve springs in one form or the other, but then you look at the latest technology to see if this has anything to solve the problem. Now big diesels have massive problems with design like a valve that weighs 2 tonne and all the associated forces etc with it.
As I said before, pneumatic actuators. they run them in F1 engines for revs, but back around 15 years ago many marine engs started to fit them.
Some big advantages.
1 the cam design can be totally revised as these engines had hydraulic actuators, no pushrods. ok for slow speed.
2 The cam shaft timing IE like V-TEC can be altered even with a push rod engine. Workspoor did it, so engine has low load and then as boost is increased [up to 2.5bar] the cam timing was altered, but the air pressure in the actuators was also increased. help with valve closing and rpm.

so why not fit pneumatic actuators and have variable "spring rate" and no spring bounce and reduce the effect of the T/V emitted from the cam.

_________________
Research is the difference between speculation and investment. Anyone who copys some one else will always be second
www.minisprintgt.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 28, 2011 8:20 am 
Offline
Bimmer Twinky
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 4:36 pm
Posts: 8606
Location: Brisbane
david rosenthal wrote:
MG Rocket wrote:
I think piston speed done this.

Image


holy mother of god, that's not piston speed just piston shambles


Ah, that`ll buff out (sorry, couldn`t help it) :-)

GT, we had them Nitrided (i believe the correct term is "Nitro-carborizing" correct me if i`m wrong)

dad`s theory (as far as i know) was to strengthen the entire crank, if a crank was hardened in the one-day process, the depth of the hardening was minimal, & the thickness would vary greatly,,,, but the way we did it, the thickest & deepest & more even-ness of hardening was making the whole crank very tough, so i`m pretty sure the hardening wasn`t just for surface wear on the journals,,, if it were then i`m sure dad would have sorted it that way,,, he was adamant that all our cranks went into the center of the tank & for the whole weekend process,,, it was an absolute "MUST_DO" to the point where if it didn`t get done that way, then dad would discard those cranks & not use them & not sell them

as a side note (because someone mentioned corrosion resistance) we`ve left a pile of cranks out in the weather in the paddock (Literally for years & years & years) & the well hardened ones don`t have rust on them , except where the wear on the journals have broken the hardening crust, or where they have been chipped/banged etc... i should take a photo of them all as it really is THAT obvious

sorry i`m not such a metallurgist to add much intelligence here,,, my only input is from using these cranks & seeing what`s happened, with & without, dad`s process for 40-odd years

& David,,, if i had a whole heap of money , (apart from buying a mansion & motha shed in Byron bay) :-) i would set up something like the desmo or the decuir system on a mini , or something similar

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GXIdOTkJhEY&feature=related

_________________
No offence intended here but--> anyone writing a book about minis 30 years ago may not have experienced such worn or stuffed-with components as we are finding these days.

You should put your heart & soul into everything you do.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 28, 2011 8:25 am 
Offline
Bimmer Twinky
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 4:36 pm
Posts: 8606
Location: Brisbane
sorry, i have more to say but just got a call & have to go work on an old Waggot engine :-)

_________________
No offence intended here but--> anyone writing a book about minis 30 years ago may not have experienced such worn or stuffed-with components as we are finding these days.

You should put your heart & soul into everything you do.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 221 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 ... 15  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: BBY755, Bing [Bot] and 102 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

© 2016 Ausmini. All garage work involves equal measures of enthusiasm, ingenuity and a fair degree of irresponsibility.