david rosenthal wrote:
SC14 blow thru at 3 bar and 6.8:1 comp ratio. Peter just watch out about talking about venturi's in a supercharger system.

some dis-agree but guess what, as far as I am concerned even with 4 carbys with ram tubes ,you need one into the plenum chamber.
what boost/comp ratio are you running on yours.
Well, I'm not even going to start comparing your engine to mine. . .yours has had
slightly more work done to it. . .
Mine was a very standard 998 with a AMR300 on it. . .so 8-point-something compression and about 6psi boost flat out. . .your is somewhat more developed. . .
Regardless of that, the air flow restrictor case is identical - and I'll argue until I'm blue in the face that the restrictor was necessary. . .I'm not entirely sure
why but I know it was needed.
Without the restrictor, the car ran fine at light throttle (off boost) and for short periods on boost. . .but if you mashed your foot and held the throttle wide open, it would run out of fuel quite quickly. . .probably in about the time it took to empty the fuel bowl. Lift your foot and let it coast - the fuel bowl would fill, the car would run-start itself and off you go.
This was neatly and
completely solved by putting a thin ally plate with about a 35mm hole in it between the inlet pipe and carby mouth. . .no problems at all at idle, light or heavy throttle from there on in. I read something about restrictor plates being used in a blow-through Weber carb setup and thought I'd give it a go. . .
I've never thought particularly deeply about it. . .fluid/air flow dynamicist I ain't. . .but I guess it has something to do with the fact that with forced induction the engine is no longer
drawing air over the carb bridge, it's being pushed across instead. . .ie the pressure differential across the throttle plate is no longer negative with respect to the engine but positive. . .
That being said, I still don't understand why that should stop fuel being pulled through the jet (as long as the bowl is seeing the same pressure as the inlet).