Ausmini
It is currently Tue Jul 22, 2025 7:48 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 15 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Mini history..
PostPosted: Tue Jul 24, 2012 11:32 am 
Offline
998cc
998cc
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2011 4:26 pm
Posts: 593
Location: Howrah, Tasmania
Hey Guys,
Im doing a negotiated study in my english class and chose to do the history of the mini...

If anyone has some links to good sites it would be much appreciated.
And any interesting stuff people may know would be good as well..

Cheers, Rhys..

_________________
2000 Holden Rodeo TD - The Daily
1998 JDM Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution V -The Weekender
1977 Leyland Mini 998cc, 1293cc in the works - The project
1977 Leyland Mini Van - Sold
1966 Morris Mini Deluxe - Sold
2004 MINI Cooper S Chilli - Sold


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 24, 2012 11:33 am 
Offline
1275cc
1275cc
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 07, 2004 5:09 pm
Posts: 2260
Location: Central Coast, NSW.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mini

http://www.ozcooper.com.au/A_Mini_History.htm

http://www.topspeed.com/cars/mini/1959- ... 10921.html

http://www.roblightbody.com/mini/history/index.htm

http://www.bmh-ltd.com/mini.htm

http://www.1959miniregister.com/mini-history/

http://www.aronline.co.uk/blogs/2011/08 ... ry-part-1/


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Mini History
PostPosted: Tue Jul 24, 2012 2:59 pm 
Offline
848cc
848cc

Joined: Sat Aug 09, 2008 5:30 pm
Posts: 479
Location: Newcastle
The early editions ie form No1 up to the year 2000, of Mini Magazine and Mini World have good articles on English history

_________________
John Sneddon
0408 431 807
1963 Morris Cooper
1965 Morris 850
1968 Morris Cooper S


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 24, 2012 3:23 pm 
Offline
1098cc
1098cc
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 12, 2005 11:48 pm
Posts: 1842
Location: Hobart, Tasmania
If you want to do it the old fashioned way, you can't go past this book. As Mini history goes its quite definitive.

Image

Tim

_________________
1951 Morris Commercial J Type Van
1955 BSA C11G
1961 Morris Mini Traveller
1969 Triumph TR6R
1977 Leyland Moke Californian


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 24, 2012 6:01 pm 
Offline
1275cc
1275cc
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 24, 2007 7:19 pm
Posts: 5370
Location: Yandina,Sunshine Coast,QLD
Minis hold a record at Bathurst. 1966 (equivalent to the Bathurst 1000), 1st too 9th outright no other car has ever come close to that, even today, let alone against cars with twice as many cylinders :D
Plus we won the Monte Carlo rally three times (roughly the equivalent of the WRC).
An interesting bit of history I reckon anyway.

_________________
Respect mine and I'll respect yours.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 24, 2012 7:47 pm 
Offline
religious status
religious status
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 6:19 pm
Posts: 39755
Location: near Baulkham Hills, NSW
Kennomini wrote:
Minis hold a record at Bathurst. 1966 (equivalent to the Bathurst 1000), 1st too 9th outright no other car has ever come close to that, even today, let alone against cars with twice as many cylinders :D
Plus we won the Monte Carlo rally three times (roughly the equivalent of the WRC).
An interesting bit of history I reckon anyway.

My 2c- ALL these wins for the Cooper S were on hydro suspension. 8) So meh to all you rubber coners.. :P

_________________
DrMini- 1970 wasaMatic 1360, Mk1S crank, 86.6HP (ATW) =~125 @ crank, 45 Dellorto (38 chokes), RE282 sprint cam, 1.5 rockers, 11.0:1 C/R. :mrgreen:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Hydros v Cones
PostPosted: Wed Jul 25, 2012 7:54 pm 
Offline
848cc
848cc
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 04, 2011 10:38 am
Posts: 359
Location: MinisintheGong [Somewhere on the South Coast]
Kev
Dont all of the Nb / Nc race cars run rubber cone?
Are there any on hydros racing that are competitive? Maybe I am being misled.
Need to know basis in the event i ever get to building a competition car.
Wayne

_________________
..still waiting for the Italian Job sequel to see if the bus went down :-) :-)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hydros v Cones
PostPosted: Wed Jul 25, 2012 8:04 pm 
Offline
religious status
religious status
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 6:19 pm
Posts: 39755
Location: near Baulkham Hills, NSW
XC9000 wrote:
Kev
Dont all of the Nb / Nc race cars run rubber cone?
Are there any on hydros racing that are competitive? Maybe I am being misled.
Need to know basis in the event i ever get to building a competition car.
Wayne

Wayne, all the Nb cars run rubber cone as they are masquerading as a UK Cooper S, circa 1964. Which were rubber cone then (before we got any Ss).
It is just a formula- they tell you what you can and cannot have in Nb, 99% of them are not Cooper S bodies, they are/were a humble 850 or Deluxe.
Also, none of them are stock, as the competition Cooper S was in Monte Carlo.

As for Nc, sorry I've no idea of their rules, but they are not stock either.

_________________
DrMini- 1970 wasaMatic 1360, Mk1S crank, 86.6HP (ATW) =~125 @ crank, 45 Dellorto (38 chokes), RE282 sprint cam, 1.5 rockers, 11.0:1 C/R. :mrgreen:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 25, 2012 8:16 pm 
Offline
Causing or creating vexation

Joined: Wed Jul 21, 2004 10:32 pm
Posts: 19124
The Monte Carlo rally was not for stock cars. It was run for different classes with a handicap that tended to favour one class. (usually Group 2 but in 1966 Group 1)
Take a look at AJB44B that won the 65 Monte and tell me what stock model Cooper S came with that grille and flares.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 25, 2012 8:21 pm 
Offline
religious status
religious status
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 6:19 pm
Posts: 39755
Location: near Baulkham Hills, NSW
When they got protested at the Mini Monte in 66? didn't they then take a stock S from a showroom and it was as fast or faster?
So the books say...

_________________
DrMini- 1970 wasaMatic 1360, Mk1S crank, 86.6HP (ATW) =~125 @ crank, 45 Dellorto (38 chokes), RE282 sprint cam, 1.5 rockers, 11.0:1 C/R. :mrgreen:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Suspensions
PostPosted: Wed Jul 25, 2012 8:24 pm 
Offline
848cc
848cc
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 04, 2011 10:38 am
Posts: 359
Location: MinisintheGong [Somewhere on the South Coast]
Kev
Thanks for that. The CAMS specs on Nb is rubber cone only, so that figures. Surprisingly, Nc (post 1/1/65) and our Aus Mk1s & 2s are all hydro production yet CAMS says hyro or rubber cone?

There are not a lot of Nc Cooper S in the competitions I've seen over the past few years - GR's of course and the Husband / wife team in Q and the odd LGT. One wonders if the Ncs, where there is choice, run hydro or rubber cone?

I used to be with you thinking hydro by preference, but it seems the overwhelming majority seem to favour cones? Maybe because failure with age is not so noticeable? Am I correct in thinking that hydro is more forgiving or telling when you are at the limits, meaning more specifically that cones are less forgiving and let go more quickly? or am I dreaming it?
Wayne

_________________
..still waiting for the Italian Job sequel to see if the bus went down :-) :-)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 25, 2012 8:34 pm 
Offline
Causing or creating vexation

Joined: Wed Jul 21, 2004 10:32 pm
Posts: 19124
drmini in aust wrote:
When they got protested at the Mini Monte in 66? didn't they then take a stock S from a showroom and it was as fast or faster?
So the books say...

In 66 cars entered in Group 1 were the only cars that could win outright, the French organised it that way! They had gotten sick of Group 2 (modified) cars winning and wanted to bring the event back to stock cars. (Group 1 was for almost stock cars with some permitted modifications.)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 25, 2012 9:21 pm 
Offline
998cc
998cc

Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2011 8:33 pm
Posts: 1195
"..My 2c- ALL these wins for the Cooper S were on hydro suspension..."

Uuuumm 33EJB was dry.....

Aaltonnen stated a preference for wet while Hopkirk and other preferred dry...but they drove what they were given..

Cheers, Ian


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 25, 2012 10:23 pm 
Offline
1275cc
1275cc
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 26, 2004 6:31 pm
Posts: 4663
Location: Sydney - strangely, I am glad of the sight of hills!!
I just downloaded all the FIA homologation papers last night.

The hydro suspension, oil cooler and RH tank was added to the 970S homologation on 16 November 1964 as Evolution of Type amendments and the flares for Group 2 Variant Option on 1 March 1968. Originals were stamped 20 March 1964.

1071S did not get the above amendments to the homologation papers originally stamped 9 May 1963.

1275S homologation originally stamped 11 April 1964 with dry suspension and the same 16 November 1964 amendment for hydro as the 970S was applied.

1275S Group 1 Series Production homologation papers show only hydrolastic and are stamped 1 June 1966.

They rehomologated dry suspension for 1275 Cooper S for Group 2 on 1 April 1970.

Note that all these homologation papers are for the UK manufactured cars and not all of the details apply to CAMS recognition of the Australian manufactured cars.

cheers
Michael

_________________
the world is a book, and those who do not travel read only a page
66 Mini Minor sponsored by http://www.lifeonthehedge.com.au/ The Dog Harness Specialists
It was a pleasure ausmini. I'll miss all you misfits and reprobates ;-)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jul 29, 2012 11:09 pm 
Offline
848cc
848cc

Joined: Tue Aug 18, 2009 6:33 pm
Posts: 132
mickmini wrote:
I just downloaded all the FIA homologation papers last night.

The hydro suspension, oil cooler and RH tank was added to the 970S homologation on 16 November 1964 as Evolution of Type amendments and the flares for Group 2 Variant Option on 1 March 1968. Originals were stamped 20 March 1964.

1071S did not get the above amendments to the homologation papers originally stamped 9 May 1963.

1275S homologation originally stamped 11 April 1964 with dry suspension and the same 16 November 1964 amendment for hydro as the 970S was applied.

1275S Group 1 Series Production homologation papers show only hydrolastic and are stamped 1 June 1966.

They rehomologated dry suspension for 1275 Cooper S for Group 2 on 1 April 1970.

Note that all these homologation papers are for the UK manufactured cars and not all of the details apply to CAMS recognition of the Australian manufactured cars.

cheers
Michael

Weight, reliability and adjustability of the spring rate.
Nb Minis are replicas of early, single tank, sliding window dry 1275 'S'
Nc is able to be a replica of the same but with some of the homolgated bits and wider wheels and flares.
An Nb car has to be a Make, Model & spec raced anywhere in the world. This is why an Nb Mustang can have disc brakes although not used in period in Aus.
Nc has to be Make, Model and spec raced in Aus. Although many bits extensively used are not allowed for unknown reasons. Ie wide flares & 12's.
All the mini (and Most european cars) are homologated in UK as FIA is in France. The Papers were submitted by RAC and specs provided by Manufatcurer.

_________________
The formula for the length of a piece of string is simple: Twice as long as from one end to the centre!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 15 posts ] 

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: acarseldine and 97 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

cron

© 2016 Ausmini. All garage work involves equal measures of enthusiasm, ingenuity and a fair degree of irresponsibility.