Ausmini
It is currently Tue Jul 22, 2025 12:36 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 28 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Jun 15, 2014 2:02 pm 
Offline
1275cc
1275cc
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 20, 2009 11:24 am
Posts: 2276
Location: Wollongong
Morris 1100 wrote:
All the cars assembled in the main assembly car assembly building have a fully stamped plate, every Morris 1100, Austin Freeway and Wolseley 24/80 in my collection of photos.
The Minis and Mokes were assembled in the CKD building.

I imagine there was only one machine in the plant, I wonder if the plates were stamped in the main plant and taken over to the CKD plant in batches?

I don't think the colour would be the reason, the body would have been made dipped and painted well before the plate was stamped.


I think thats a pretty fair explanation. Despite what many think the factory's assembly process (especially the main assembly building) was highly organised and automated, so they new in advance what exactly what was was being built where and when. A good friend of my fathers who also worked in Engineering bought a Cooper S from the factory. They were able to let him know when the car was being assembled if he wanted to come down to the factory floor and watch.

So getting the plates pre-stamped (for that day?) is quite possible, and I guess if they did know what engine was going into a particular car, for whatever reason, then of course why not get the lot stamped out.

Would be interesting to see the machine they used. I have noticed on other Special Burgundy cars the 'P' in 'SPEC" almost always hangs down below the other letters, like a dodgy typewriter.

_________________
Image
68 Morris Cooper S Mk1 (*ex 78 1275 LS 4th last built, 70 Morris 1500 OHC & 70 MiniMatic)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jun 15, 2014 2:07 pm 
Offline
848cc
848cc

Joined: Sun Jun 15, 2014 11:41 am
Posts: 9
Thanks for the information Winabbey. Look forward to seeing the register one day.

Linton


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 16, 2014 10:13 am 
Offline
848cc
848cc

Joined: Sun Jun 15, 2014 11:41 am
Posts: 9
https://www.flickr.com/photos/95628962@N04/14431776885/

Here is a picture of my ID plate. I hope I have done this correctly.

What do you think?

Linton


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 16, 2014 11:08 am 
Offline
848cc
848cc

Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2006 9:01 pm
Posts: 27
Location: Bay of Plenty NZ
My two owner numbers matching Cooper S has all the letters stamped from the reverse the same as yours. It is just 259 numbers away from your car and is completely original. Most owners who have their car ID plates stamped in this way seem to be from around 1966-1967. I am of the opinion the factory may have been a bit more organised during this period somehow with the engines being allocated prior to the stamping of the ID plate. No science, just my 2c worth.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 17, 2014 8:44 am 
Offline
1098cc
1098cc

Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2004 3:57 pm
Posts: 1478
Location: queensland
Linton78 wrote:
Wow what a forum! Thank for all the fast replies.



I had this hope that perhaps the Bathurst cars had this unusual ID plate engine stamping. My theory was that they knew which engines were being fitted to the cars. I just made all that up of course ha ha.


Linton



Not the case sorry.

_________________
1970 Cooper S ex-Bathurst & ATCC
1964 Austin Cooper S ex-Group C race car
1967 Morris Cooper S ex-Group B
1962 Mini Speed sports sedan
1968-71 ex-Peter Manton Shell car


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 17, 2014 2:51 pm 
Offline
848cc
848cc

Joined: Sun Jun 15, 2014 11:41 am
Posts: 9
low n blown wrote:
Linton78 wrote:
Wow what a forum! Thank for all the fast replies.



I had this hope that perhaps the Bathurst cars had this unusual ID plate engine stamping. My theory was that they knew which engines were being fitted to the cars. I just made all that up of course ha ha.


Linton



Not the case sorry.



Yes, sort of thought that!

My biggest concern is that the car is genuine. I would like to get the restoration process under way soon. The car itself seems legitimate and it has been good to hear form others that have ID plates that are similarly stamped.

Thanks for all the help,

Linton


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jun 22, 2014 11:28 am 
Offline
848cc
848cc

Joined: Sun Jun 15, 2014 11:41 am
Posts: 9
I have been doing a little more research and came across this paint identification thread, viewtopic.php?f=25&t=66469 - very helpful.

My ID plate specifies the colour of my car was all over Toga White. It is interesting to note that Toga White was not an option for 1967, the year my car was manufactured. Was this normal for the paint colours to cross into other years? My car was white but according to the charts it should be Snow White?

Justminis had a theory that his ID plate, engine number was stamped from the back due to his car being a special order black car.

If the available BMC colours did not cross into other years, but you wanted to order a previous colour or special colour, for what ever reason, that this constituted a special order and thus may have led to having an unusually stamped ID plate?

A question to those that have seen rear stamped engine number ID plates, are the colours stated on the plates unusual for the year of the car?

Obviously if BMC were painting cars in any year model paint this theory is squashed.

Thanks,

Linton
South Coast NSW


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jun 22, 2014 12:18 pm 
Offline
848cc
848cc
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 7:35 pm
Posts: 367
Location: Adelaide, SA
Linton78 wrote:
I have been doing a little more research and came across this paint identification thread, viewtopic.php?f=25&t=66469 - very helpful.

That's a very interesting thread. (sorry to hijack)

I have a Toga White car I thought was a 1967 and now it shows it's a 1966.
I also have a Snow White car I thought was a 1968 and now it shows it's a 1967.

_________________
Justin


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jun 22, 2014 1:24 pm 
Offline
Causing or creating vexation

Joined: Wed Jul 21, 2004 10:32 pm
Posts: 19124
You can't trust the years in the Dulux paint books. They are only a rough guide.
Dulux was not the main paint supplier to BMC but they were the main supplier to the repair industry.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 18, 2014 3:17 pm 
Offline
848cc
848cc
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 03, 2014 10:34 am
Posts: 330
Location: Williamstown, VIC
Mick wrote:
The reverse stamping has come up from time to time, and was certainly prevalent on the riveted engine block id tags. Its not something the average mug can do, so take heart, you need a set of stamps which read normally, as normal stamps are created backwards.

The clues will be in the bodywork, more than what is applied to it in parts, This includes the stamps.
How is the tank support attached to the floor? The fuel tank breather tags, underfloor breather, etc?



With regards to the stamping of engine numbers either from behind or in front, plates seem to have the engine prefix e.g 9F/Sa/Y stamped from behind and then the number 00001 stamped from the front in a different font to the rest of the plate. I have also seen some however where the engine number prefix and number is all stamped from the front and the font is different to the rest of the plate. Is this normal or would it imply a re stamped plate ??

_________________
1972 Leyland Mini Clubman
2000 Honda CBR929RR


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 19, 2014 9:34 pm 
Offline
998cc
998cc
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 11, 2005 12:41 pm
Posts: 911
Location: Bunbury WA
You say that the engine number is stamped as 9F/Sa/Y this is normal for the ID plate , but the engine block should be stamped as 9F/SA/Y

_________________
1965 Morris 850
1966 Morris Mini Minor
1967 Morris Cooper 'S'
1977 Leyland LS


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 19, 2014 9:39 pm 
Offline
848cc
848cc
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 03, 2014 10:34 am
Posts: 330
Location: Williamstown, VIC
AJ wrote:
You say that the engine number is stamped as 9F/Sa/Y this is normal for the ID plate , but the engine block should be stamped as 9F/SA/Y


Thanks AJ I got that bit. I have seen a plate where the engine number both the alpha digits at the start and the number digits at the end are all upper case and stamped from the front, just wondered if that was ok

_________________
1972 Leyland Mini Clubman
2000 Honda CBR929RR


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 20, 2014 8:00 am 
Offline
998cc
998cc
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 11, 2005 12:41 pm
Posts: 911
Location: Bunbury WA
simo74 wrote:
AJ wrote:
You say that the engine number is stamped as 9F/Sa/Y this is normal for the ID plate , but the engine block should be stamped as 9F/SA/Y


Thanks AJ I got that bit. I have seen a plate where the engine number both the alpha digits at the start and the number digits at the end are all upper case and stamped from the front, just wondered if that was ok


Yes the early Cooper and 850 are stamped like that .....

_________________
1965 Morris 850
1966 Morris Mini Minor
1967 Morris Cooper 'S'
1977 Leyland LS


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 28 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 73 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

© 2016 Ausmini. All garage work involves equal measures of enthusiasm, ingenuity and a fair degree of irresponsibility.