Ausmini
It is currently Tue Jul 22, 2025 1:44 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 35 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: cam followers
PostPosted: Fri Feb 13, 2015 8:53 am 
Offline
848cc
848cc
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 26, 2013 12:34 pm
Posts: 40
Location: Sydney
It used to be a Kent 544 cam. Tappet noise, constantly changing valve clearances, then I noticed abnormal stretch in the timing chain, then eventually all the bits of metal found their way into the gearbox & it started crunching into 4th. Needless to say, I've just had to rebuild the box, now moving on to the motor.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: cam followers
PostPosted: Fri Feb 13, 2015 11:36 am 
Offline
998cc
998cc
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 13, 2010 4:19 pm
Posts: 840
Location: Ridin' the rails somewhere
Bennoz wrote:
It used to be a Kent 544 cam. Tappet noise, constantly changing valve clearances, then I noticed abnormal stretch in the timing chain, then eventually all the bits of metal found their way into the gearbox & it started crunching into 4th. Needless to say, I've just had to rebuild the box, now moving on to the motor.


Thanks for the info...having just built an engine & checking all the followers were spinning (one wasn't which lead to a partial stripdown - one advantage of a small-bore!) I was curious to what drew your attention to the issue. I will be sure to note any valve clearance changes...

cheers,

Jacob

_________________
'72 Clubman Van - 1022cc, 295 head, 731 cam - Daily Driver :D
'69 Morris 1100 S - Dinged by a bus, in shed under repair
'64 Morris 1100 - Early 1100, long term project



Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: cam followers
PostPosted: Sat Feb 14, 2015 7:45 am 
Offline
998cc
998cc

Joined: Mon Apr 05, 2004 11:23 am
Posts: 581
Location: Eastern Melbourne
Just so everyone knows the new ACL Australian Consumer Laws make the consumers reasonable expectation trump the warranty or provisional statements of a business. This started in 2012 and all consumers should wield it like a very big stick.

So if you buy replacement followers to the originals then it's reasonable they will be profile ground not flat ground unless stated. If your cam chews out and the engine needs a rebuild then the reasonable costs to do that are on the follower supplier. If you doubt this then you haven't read the ACL that replaced much of the TPA. The big chain retailer I'm in has had their legal teams banging this down our throats. I saw a 2" weld that had failed and any of us would spent the week end removing the part, getting a replacement from the supplied and reinstalling it, in this case the client simply called ACCC and the supplier went from a $47 part to a $3400 fix (it wasn't a car).

Time we all focused on weeding out the shonksters


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: cam followers
PostPosted: Sat Feb 14, 2015 4:40 pm 
Offline
998cc
998cc
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2012 1:39 pm
Posts: 585
Location: qld
Besser, good info.....Hard to prove what went first, or if followers weren't rotating etc.... not disputing your consumer law, just thinking i an engine with squillions of reciprocating, twirling, spinning, etc parts many a part company would play hard ball.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: cam followers
PostPosted: Sun Feb 15, 2015 2:13 pm 
Offline
1098cc
1098cc

Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2004 3:57 pm
Posts: 1478
Location: queensland
Besser wrote:
Just so everyone knows the new ACL Australian Consumer Laws make the consumers reasonable expectation trump the warranty or provisional statements of a business. This started in 2012 and all consumers should wield it like a very big stick.

So if you buy replacement followers to the originals then it's reasonable they will be profile ground not flat ground unless stated. If your cam chews out and the engine needs a rebuild then the reasonable costs to do that are on the follower supplier. If you doubt this then you haven't read the ACL that replaced much of the TPA. The big chain retailer I'm in has had their legal teams banging this down our throats. I saw a 2" weld that had failed and any of us would spent the week end removing the part, getting a replacement from the supplied and reinstalling it, in this case the client simply called ACCC and the supplier went from a $47 part to a $3400 fix (it wasn't a car).

Time we all focused on weeding out the shonksters


Most of us buy our parts direct from OS due to the cost saving. No jurisdiction for Aus Consumer laws. Trying to prove beyond a balance of probabilities that the part in question is the cause of failure would invariably cost more than the hope of financial retribution. In other words not worth the risk. Someone earlier said you can't trust anything coming out of a box as being correct and thats absolutely the truth. Even new parts should be disassembled and checked. How clean do you think the muppets hands or the workshop in India were when he/they assembled your new rocker gear. Believe me......not very.

G.

_________________
1970 Cooper S ex-Bathurst & ATCC
1964 Austin Cooper S ex-Group C race car
1967 Morris Cooper S ex-Group B
1962 Mini Speed sports sedan
1968-71 ex-Peter Manton Shell car


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: cam followers
PostPosted: Sun Feb 15, 2015 9:35 pm 
Offline
848cc
848cc

Joined: Tue Aug 18, 2009 6:33 pm
Posts: 132
Good point Greg. Even if you could prove durisdiction then the admission that the engine sat for 'many years' before being started would mean the thin lifter bore lube or the break in lube on lobes may be gone at startup. Also the cam appears to be an undercut second hand unit and could have been soft and contributed to premature failure. Also the engine builder would be the one to ensure the two components were compatible, lobe taper, face radius hardnesses, nose pressures etc. I doubt ACCC or Fair Trading would bat an eyelid.
The Recent ACL changes brought bought concerns in the building game.
The ACL subject is interesting though as most people have always accepted that race engines have no warranty because of the nature of their use. I wonder what would come of an ACL claim. I have thought maybe the variables of 'over revved' 'incorrect warmup' etc would stand up?
I do know that anyone importing parts to resell is deemed to hold the responsibility as if they are the manufacturer.
Don't jump to the conclusion the follower was to blame unless you do the diagnosis , or better still check the components as does GR.

_________________
The formula for the length of a piece of string is simple: Twice as long as from one end to the centre!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: cam followers
PostPosted: Mon Feb 16, 2015 6:51 am 
Offline
1360cc
1360cc
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2004 11:32 am
Posts: 12390
Location: Sthrn HiLoLands, NSW, Australia
My experience with ACCC is that they appear to be largely a toothless tiger...they will mediate (IF both parties agree of course) and they can bring the "full force of the consumer law to bear" (IF you get a court order! at great expense)

_________________
"Show me the Mini!"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: cam followers
PostPosted: Mon Feb 16, 2015 7:57 am 
Offline
Bimmer Twinky
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 4:36 pm
Posts: 8606
Location: Brisbane
The person "fitting" the part should be checking it`s correct "Before" fitting, or "During" fitting...
hence why i keep belting on about inexperienced people building their own engines may well need to re-think what they`re doing & grab some professional help before building an engine or a gearbox on their own..

It`s all good crying about it after the damage is done,,, but far better to avoid it in the first place

_________________
No offence intended here but--> anyone writing a book about minis 30 years ago may not have experienced such worn or stuffed-with components as we are finding these days.

You should put your heart & soul into everything you do.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: cam followers
PostPosted: Mon Feb 16, 2015 7:23 pm 
Offline
1360cc
1360cc
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2004 11:32 am
Posts: 12390
Location: Sthrn HiLoLands, NSW, Australia
TheMiniMan wrote:
The person "fitting" the part should be checking it`s correct "Before" fitting, or "During" fitting...
hence why i keep belting on about inexperienced people building their own engines may well need to re-think what they`re doing & grab some professional help before building an engine or a gearbox on their own..

It`s all good crying about it after the damage is done,,, but far better to avoid it in the first place


So Matt...by professional help...do you mean counselling? or some one who gets paid to put A Series together? :P :lol:

_________________
"Show me the Mini!"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: cam followers
PostPosted: Wed Feb 18, 2015 6:30 pm 
Offline
Oh dear, worry, worry...

Joined: Fri Jun 19, 2009 5:31 pm
Posts: 692
Location: North Rocks
HI All
After gathering all our information, photos video's, and letter writing it was sent to the cam follower manufacture of our mini and other bucket type cam followers,only to receive an answer back saying they do not have any problems with their followers and according to them they do not have any returns with faults, totally disregarding what we had have them sent,
They even sent back a video of them testing one by running a dial indicator across the face of one of their followers, showing that it was correct, also noting that they sell 150000 MINI followers a year and the volume is going up each year.

So I don't know what the answer is when they just turn a blind eye to the problem and keep selling rubbish to us,all I can say is if you buy new cam followers for your motor just have them ground to be sure to be sure.
Any body that buys a cam from me I will grind their follower for nothing just for my piece of mind.
Graham Russell

_________________
"It's better to be not informed than ill-informed"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: cam followers
PostPosted: Wed Feb 18, 2015 6:47 pm 
Offline
1098cc
1098cc

Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2007 2:07 pm
Posts: 1882
Location: Lemmings, everywhere.
:roll:

_________________
Have a Nice Day.
If already having a nice day please disregard.


Last edited by 850man on Mon Jun 15, 2015 7:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: cam followers
PostPosted: Wed Feb 18, 2015 7:52 pm 
Offline
Oh dear, worry, worry...

Joined: Fri Jun 19, 2009 5:31 pm
Posts: 692
Location: North Rocks
850man
I for one do not heat treat cams or phosphate coat them after grinding and for good reason steel cams do not need it, un like cast cams which need to be done which is usually done by Parkerising this process actually eats away the steel leaving the graphite sitting higher up than the steel, which creates a slippery surface for the follower to run on until it gets oil to it an allows the follower and cam to bed into each other.
I also have hardener testers to measure the flanks of the cams and hardness of followers, I only know of one other in Australia that has the equipment to do this.
Also have you ever seen what happens to a mini cam after they have been ground and you heat treat them? I have and when you put them back in the grinder clock up on number one the rest of the lobes are not always where they should be,that is after you straighten them as they come out like a banana.
One thing that coatings on cams does is hide all the chatter marks on the lobes when they are not ground correctly ground.
But all this has nothing to with the fact that CAM FOLLOWER ARE NOT BEING MADE CORRECTLY and that's what we are trying to correct.
Graham Russell

_________________
"It's better to be not informed than ill-informed"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: cam followers
PostPosted: Wed Feb 18, 2015 8:19 pm 
Offline
1360cc
1360cc
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2004 11:32 am
Posts: 12390
Location: Sthrn HiLoLands, NSW, Australia
Thanks for fighting the good fight GR...

Question: so should everyone start save followers to build up a stock of original old stock?

I am thinking about all the blocks that (for example) may have put a foot out of bed and were scrapped as beyond economic repair...including camshafts and followers etc

_________________
"Show me the Mini!"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: cam followers
PostPosted: Wed Feb 18, 2015 9:13 pm 
Offline
1098cc
1098cc
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2009 11:28 pm
Posts: 1550
Bennoz wrote:
Sorry to dig up an old topic, but I've just been bitten by this. I built this motor many many years ago & it's just sat there. I had completely forgotten all about this problem.

Recently fired it up & this is the result after approx 5000kms.

Image
Image
Image




Good lord that looks terrible! :shock:

I have to say, my personal experiences with Kent Cams have been less than fantastic as well. I don't like to say it because they have such a good reputation, I've noticed the same sorts of things. A cam I had a few years ago was hardened but not core refined, and during grinding you could see where the hard layer was cracking off the core. Also had issues with lobes being out by miles.

Just touching quickly on comments about heat treating camshafts, it is a NIGHTMARE trying to find anyone that knows how to quench harden thin shafts without bending them. It doesn't surprise me at all to hear stories of them coming back bent or twisted.

Problems occur when the shaft is just dropped in water or oil. One side quenches before the other and bends it up. You need to swirl the water or oil and get a whirl pool happening, then stick the shaft in the centre and allow the vortex to collapse on the shaft instantly quenching it from all sides at the same time. Yes it will still move a bit, but not nearly as badly as it would other wise. Next part is making sure its actually tempered properly so that the hard outside layer bonds to the soft core properly (the part I've seen ****ed up on kent cams in the past). Cast iron shafts are a bit different because the lobes and journals are chilled during casting.

I know that Tighe Cams heat treat their cams, as did Wade, as do Clive. Its not uncommon practice, and it does benefit wear.

Where I'm working at the moment, we hardness test Camshafts, Crank Shafts, Gudgeon Pins, rocker shafts and other parts before assembly. And I know that Jim Donahue has a hardness tester and checks his parts too (as well as a Cam Doctor), as does even Windsor Engines (though they send theirs out for hardness testing, I don't think they do theirs in house), as did wade and Tighe test theirs too. Any quality, performance engine shop will do it, it's cheap assurance that parts aren't going to fail on you (especially when you're dealing with Diesels that are worth more than most houses in Sydney :lol: ).

Always interesting to see how these parts are wearing after a few hours of use. And good points raised by GR about having even brand new followers checked and corrected as needed.


.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: cam followers
PostPosted: Wed Feb 18, 2015 9:35 pm 
Offline
998cc
998cc

Joined: Mon Mar 10, 2014 11:38 am
Posts: 1143
Location: Tassie
9YaTaH wrote:
Thanks for fighting the good fight GR...

Question: so should everyone start save followers to build up a stock of original old stock?


I was wondering the same thing. Would we be better off refacing old followers rather than buy new ones?

_________________
1963 Morris 850 Smoke Grey
1963 Morris 850 Shadow Blue
1965 Morris Mini Smooth Van
1966 Morris Mini Van
1969 Morris Mini Deluxe Resto
5/72 Clubman Gt


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 35 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot] and 91 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

© 2016 Ausmini. All garage work involves equal measures of enthusiasm, ingenuity and a fair degree of irresponsibility.