As a journalist my profession is the dissemination of information. To say "I have the proof. I don't like sharing all the information" is pointless. If the proof exists show it and let everybody see it - otherwise it isn't proof at all but more hearsay evidence or just someone's opinion.
As I always say, I am prepared to modify or correct what I write and what I believe when someone is able to convince me of the facts, either through proof or strong argument.
Obviously some information (that you have eluded to, and I'm sure people will now start asking about that trophy) should not be shared in the interest of protecting people's privacy, etc, etc. But withholding evidence or proof of an historic nature, and complaining that people continue to get it wrong - especially when such "wrong" information is being published (as I do in the magazine) - simply doesn't make sense. Either show the evidence that supports your case, or expect that people simply won't believe it. In the absence of proof to the contrary, the established information will continue to get published and reproduced. There's no point saying "I'm right and you're wrong" if you won't show the evidence.
OK, so 3449 CKD packs shipped out between March and September. Are you talking 1961? That's 6 months. According to other sources assembly began in Australia in January or February - that makes more sense when the car was released locally on 24 March 1961 (the "birth notice" in the papers on 23 March said "Visitors welcome from tomorrow", so the actual release date must have been 24th).
Other published information I have says local pressing of panels didn't begin until March or April 1964.
So, what happened between September 1961 and March 1964?
Yes, I have heard there are different floor pressings on the very early cars. Apart from the changes made because of the water ingress problems I am not aware of what those differences entail. Details? Drawings? Technical or Service Notes?
I don't understand what you mean by the 9/ Show us some examples. See below for an early ID plate and a late ID plate. My understanding is that any plate with two numbers stamped (eg 90598 / 8010) means the car was CKD with the first number being the chassis or CKD number allocated by UK and the following number being the Australian car number. If this is not correct then show me the facts. Do you have a copy of the relevant BMC Standards?
Watto - everyone knows who I am (I have nothing to hide).

