justfanginaround wrote:
If you turbo a 1275 then you are more financialy stable than most , personally I would turbo a 998 cheaper parts to start with and easeir to obtain, it will still do everything that a 1275 will do except be able to wear a 1275 boot badge and a std. a series gearbox will hold 160hp/115lob/ft of torque
Metro A+ gearboxes are stronger than Std A series so buy a long eng. from someone who has imported it from ENGLAND , its a very good and cheap way to start.
How would a 998 turbo be much cheaper? Turbo parts are going to cost the same. Engine work costs the same per hour. Performance parts are the same. 1275 has advantages in that it has more power, torque and a better head design standard, well worth the premium for cost for engine itself. Although I do agree 998s are easier to obtain, although I've never found finding a 1275 hard. So in the end I don't believe choosing 1275 will cost a lot more. If you consider cost per horsepower you can break even if not do better.
Also a stock A-series gearbox may be able to take that kind of power and torque figures (where did you get those numbers from?), but I'm sure the drop gears won't for too long. Well not stock ones at least. Also gearboxes got better as time went on so perhaps a 4 synchro remote change box (Mini K) would be able to take that power, but the drop gears won't. A+ boxes had larger idler gear bearings to reduce failure.
I'm speaking form experience and a recent, expensive gearbox rebuild.
Oh yes I belive A+ gearboxes are better (are metro better again?), in that the idler gear bearing is larger, but I've heard mixed opinions on whether or not the 'boxes themselves are actually stronger.
PS. Not having a go, just creating discussion.
_________________
1964 Morris 850, 1330 Supercharged - 81.8hp atws.
1975 Leyland Mini S 1100S powered - Nice and reliable.
1977 Leyland Mini LS - Project LS-T
