Angusdog wrote:
For something that was in production for so long, all the innovation was done in the first design. The first improvements were to make them less lethal in an impact (anti burst latches) and correcting production problems (flanges going the wrong way in the toeboard). (I'm ignoring the Rover Minis and the Metro to further my argument). For a long time, "good enough" and hard economic conditions meant the design stagnated. Compare it to the world's best selling car, the Corolla.
Late night (in NZ) idea: They should have made it a hatchback when the Clubman was designed, put the fuel tank under the floor and dropped a Twin Cam into it. Dunlop run-
flat tyres was what we got instead.
History history proves that prototypes were developed with hatchbacks, OHC engines, split-fold rear seats and CVT transmissions. All were rejected by the prevailing management of the time.
71-72 Export spec Mokes (Made in Oz in limited numbers) had a AH Sprite tank mounted in the rear subframe. In theory these tanks could be fitted to a Mini with a modified boot floor.
Slightly mad-tech idea. Export Moke tank, standard van/traveller tank and side-mount Traveller tank. 90-100L of fuel capacity, easy Melbourne to Sydney, probably even Melbourne to Newcastle, without refuelling!