Ausmini
It is currently Tue Jun 24, 2025 4:06 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 41 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 20, 2008 10:33 am 
Offline
1275cc
1275cc
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2004 1:52 pm
Posts: 4434
Location: Melbourne, VIC.
Timbo wrote:
I like the "All-steel for safety and strength". Implying that the wooden one is dangerous and weak? Weird really because the wood is just decorative and they are built the same underneath.


I think that was a reference to the Morris Minor Traveller, where the wood frame was a structural part of the rear end.

_________________
Brett Nicholson
Greendale (near Ballan) VIC.
1971 Morris Mini Moke
1966 Austin Mini
1965 Morris Mini Traveller
1973 LR Series 3 88
2007 LR Freelander 2


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 20, 2008 3:13 pm 
Offline
998cc
998cc
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2005 3:48 pm
Posts: 1199
Location: Bundanoon nsw
Deceptive advertising in 60's by car companies , never heard of it , it's just that smoking stunts your growth thats why he stands 2ft 9in , or was it that the cars were bigger when they were first made and all that vigorous washing over the decades has shrunk them.

_________________
That's why it's good to be.............ME


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 20, 2008 5:44 pm 
Offline
Causing or creating vexation

Joined: Wed Jul 21, 2004 10:32 pm
Posts: 19124
Maybe they were short staffed?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 20, 2008 6:03 pm 
Offline
1098cc
1098cc
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2004 6:21 am
Posts: 1788
Location: Wullingtun, Unzud
And yet the new MINI Crossman is bigger than that.

If the petrol tank fits into the rear subframe, why did they never put it there in the sedan?They'd had had to rejig the battery and spare wheel, but it would have worked.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 20, 2008 7:27 pm 
Offline
1098cc
1098cc
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 12, 2005 11:48 pm
Posts: 1842
Location: Hobart, Tasmania
The tank isn't in the rear subframe, its behind it, the extra length between the rear of the subframe and the valance provides just enough room.

Tim

_________________
1951 Morris Commercial J Type Van
1955 BSA C11G
1961 Morris Mini Traveller
1969 Triumph TR6R
1977 Leyland Moke Californian


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 20, 2008 7:44 pm 
Offline
1098cc
1098cc
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2004 6:21 am
Posts: 1788
Location: Wullingtun, Unzud
Really? I've got an Estate and I removed a tank from a van; you'd think I'd know that. Anyway, the tank should be between the rear subframe 'legs'. Crash protection, more space - if the Mini was redesigned as time went on, things like this would have been done.

For something that was in production for so long, all the innovation was done in the first design. The first improvements were to make them less lethal in an impact (anti burst latches) and correcting production problems (flanges going the wrong way in the toeboard). (I'm ignoring the Rover Minis and the Metro to further my argument). For a long time, "good enough" and hard economic conditions meant the design stagnated. Compare it to the world's best selling car, the Corolla.

Late night (in NZ) idea: They should have made it a hatchback when the Clubman was designed, put the fuel tank under the floor and dropped a Twin Cam into it. Dunlop run-flat tyres was what we got instead.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Rolla
PostPosted: Mon Oct 20, 2008 8:13 pm 
Offline
1360cc
1360cc
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2004 11:32 am
Posts: 12390
Location: Sthrn HiLoLands, NSW, Australia
Angusdog wrote:
Really? I've got an Estate and I removed a tank from a van; you'd think I'd know that. Anyway, the tank should be between the rear subframe 'legs'. Crash protection, more space - if the Mini was redesigned as time went on, things like this would have been done.

For something that was in production for so long, all the innovation was done in the first design. The first improvements were to make them less lethal in an impact (anti burst latches) and correcting production problems (flanges going the wrong way in the toeboard). (I'm ignoring the Rover Minis and the Metro to further my argument). For a long time, "good enough" and hard economic conditions meant the design stagnated. Compare it to the world's best selling car, the Corolla.

Late night (in NZ) idea: They should have made it a hatchback when the Clubman was designed, put the fuel tank under the floor and dropped a Twin Cam into it. Dunlop run-flat tyres was what we got instead.


Thanks for dropping in from the Rolla Forum...see ya :D

_________________
"Show me the Mini!"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rolla
PostPosted: Tue Oct 21, 2008 6:19 am 
Offline
1098cc
1098cc
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2004 6:21 am
Posts: 1788
Location: Wullingtun, Unzud
9YaTaH wrote:
Angusdog wrote:
For a long time, "good enough" and hard economic conditions meant the design stagnated. Compare it to the world's best selling car, the Corolla.


Thanks for dropping in from the Rolla Forum...see ya :D


Didn't mean to sound like I was dissing the Mini, or waving the flag for Toyota (Shoot me in the head if I do). I think saying the Corolla is the NZ's most popular car is deceptive since only the name stayed the same. But it was developed and faults ironed out; with small changes over the years, the Mini could have had more space in the boot for example, a twin cam engine that faced the 'right' way (although checking points down the back of the firewall doesn't seem like fun) and could have been safer. The problem was partially the british economic situation which meant scant funds for development. The talent and ideas were there but they weren't able to capitalise on it.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 21, 2008 9:08 am 
Offline
1275cc
1275cc
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2004 1:52 pm
Posts: 4434
Location: Melbourne, VIC.
Angusdog wrote:
For something that was in production for so long, all the innovation was done in the first design. The first improvements were to make them less lethal in an impact (anti burst latches) and correcting production problems (flanges going the wrong way in the toeboard). (I'm ignoring the Rover Minis and the Metro to further my argument). For a long time, "good enough" and hard economic conditions meant the design stagnated. Compare it to the world's best selling car, the Corolla.

Late night (in NZ) idea: They should have made it a hatchback when the Clubman was designed, put the fuel tank under the floor and dropped a Twin Cam into it. Dunlop run-
flat tyres was what we got instead.


History history proves that prototypes were developed with hatchbacks, OHC engines, split-fold rear seats and CVT transmissions. All were rejected by the prevailing management of the time.

71-72 Export spec Mokes (Made in Oz in limited numbers) had a AH Sprite tank mounted in the rear subframe. In theory these tanks could be fitted to a Mini with a modified boot floor.

Slightly mad-tech idea. Export Moke tank, standard van/traveller tank and side-mount Traveller tank. 90-100L of fuel capacity, easy Melbourne to Sydney, probably even Melbourne to Newcastle, without refuelling!

_________________
Brett Nicholson
Greendale (near Ballan) VIC.
1971 Morris Mini Moke
1966 Austin Mini
1965 Morris Mini Traveller
1973 LR Series 3 88
2007 LR Freelander 2


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 21, 2008 9:13 am 
Offline
1098cc
1098cc
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 12, 2005 11:48 pm
Posts: 1842
Location: Hobart, Tasmania
bnicho wrote:
Slightly mad-tech idea. Export Moke tank, standard van/traveller tank and side-mount Traveller tank. 90-100L of fuel capacity, easy Melbourne to Sydney, probably even Melbourne to Newcastle, without refuelling!


Yeah but all that fuel wouldn't be any use if you were stuck on the side of the road on the northern outskirts of Melbourne with a flat tyre. :lol:

Tim

_________________
1951 Morris Commercial J Type Van
1955 BSA C11G
1961 Morris Mini Traveller
1969 Triumph TR6R
1977 Leyland Moke Californian


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 21, 2008 9:40 am 
Offline
1275cc
1275cc
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2004 1:52 pm
Posts: 4434
Location: Melbourne, VIC.
Timbo wrote:

Yeah but all that fuel wouldn't be any use if you were stuck on the side of the road on the northern outskirts of Melbourne with a flat tyre. :lol:

Tim


Easy, the spare tyre can go on the roof rack.

It's only something you would bother with if you had a long distance to run between petrol stations. eg: crossing the Gobi desert!

_________________
Brett Nicholson
Greendale (near Ballan) VIC.
1971 Morris Mini Moke
1966 Austin Mini
1965 Morris Mini Traveller
1973 LR Series 3 88
2007 LR Freelander 2


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 41 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot] and 79 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

© 2016 Ausmini. All garage work involves equal measures of enthusiasm, ingenuity and a fair degree of irresponsibility.