Drexxle wrote:
See thats sensible, but do you expect the ministers/police/transport authorities to be sensible.
In a word, No.
Tombo wrote:
Does this mean 4X4's behind minis should be lowered substantially to be safe to other drivers?
I followed my Pathie home in the Mini when it was raised. The first alignment they did on it... It was way out. But I only knew that because I followed it for 40 minutes, thinking, "Man that rear camber is massively positive on the right rear!" It was at +1.4º.
Thinking back to the original post... How many vehicles are there out there that could be lowered
more than 50mm? Let alone the 150mm mentioned? Surely people aren't going and importing Hummers, then lowering them? They'd be less conspicuous!
Mick wrote:
Raising a 4wd by 5 cm isn't a speck on the arse of the results the 4wd guys are chasing. From that you could argue its an attack on the 4wd guys more than its an attack on the skyline and silvia set..
You're right - there's been a lot of discussion about it for a long time... At the moment, to my understanding, a 4WD can go up 2" in suspension and 2" in wheel diameter without engineering. Then you get people who go and throw in body lifts... There's a 5" lift (well, diff drop, really) available (engineered) for my Pathie, that's before you go and increase tyre size...
It's definitely seen by people on 4WD forums as an attack on them.
And really lifted 4WD's which look really terrible to steer? It's often because the bloke's been out 4WDing, and hasn't bothered reconnecting the sway bars yet.
NAV wrote:
And as said before "not legal for road use" should be banned from being sold. Those same items you see clogging the shelves at Repco, Autobarn, Supercheap and many many more other smaller chains.
And that should extend to wheel spacers, lighting, everything.