Ausmini
It is currently Fri Jul 18, 2025 5:21 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 43 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 01, 2010 9:01 pm 
Offline
Mods rock!
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 03, 2008 9:02 pm
Posts: 5079
From the floor it looks like a pov pak early clubman, but set up for rod shift.....it's had a 'new' front floor section welded in. The Rad shroud could have been changed however the appearance of the firewall (no numbers) also suggests some (bad) funny business.......

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 01, 2010 10:01 pm 
Offline
848cc
848cc
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 23, 2008 1:14 pm
Posts: 352
Location: Country Victoria
GT mowog wrote:
From the floor it looks like a pov pak early clubman, but set up for rod shift.....it's had a 'new' front floor section welded in. The Rad shroud could have been changed however the appearance of the firewall (no numbers) also suggests some (bad) funny business.......


As you can see from the Photo, we were trying to look for funny business regarding the numbers. There is also no disturbance on the inside of the fire wall of paint, as if there has never been numbers there. The shroud appears to be original. Dose the P4-82 mean anything to anybody.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 01, 2010 10:09 pm 
Offline
1098cc
1098cc
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 11:47 am
Posts: 1212
Location: In Transit, Sydney
watto wrote:
John Smidt said he often rebirthed Cooper Ss as Mini Ks


Probably not the best choice of words to use on a public forum :?

_________________
Your silliness has been noted.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jul 02, 2010 7:03 am 
Offline
Mods rock!
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 03, 2008 9:02 pm
Posts: 5079
flapper wrote:
GT mowog wrote:
From the floor it looks like a pov pak early clubman, but set up for rod shift.....it's had a 'new' front floor section welded in. The Rad shroud could have been changed however the appearance of the firewall (no numbers) also suggests some (bad) funny business.......


As you can see from the Photo, we were trying to look for funny business regarding the numbers. There is also no disturbance on the inside of the fire wall of paint, as if there has never been numbers there. The shroud appears to be original. Dose the P4-82 mean anything to anybody.


They stamped the firewall numbers before painting.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jul 02, 2010 1:48 pm 
Offline
1275cc
1275cc
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 20, 2009 11:24 am
Posts: 2276
Location: Wollongong
I thought in the early models the rad was stamped before painting and the firewall after. That's why the firewall often looks rusty. 

_________________
Image
68 Morris Cooper S Mk1 (*ex 78 1275 LS 4th last built, 70 Morris 1500 OHC & 70 MiniMatic)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jul 02, 2010 2:29 pm 
Offline
Mods rock!
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 03, 2008 9:02 pm
Posts: 5079
phillb wrote:
I thought in the early models the rad was stamped before painting and the firewall after. That's why the firewall often looks rusty. 


The firewalls are rusty from carelessness when filling the master cylinders.

The firewall is the first section of the car body that is made when assembling the bodies, so it was stamped at this early point to keep track of it.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jul 02, 2010 7:07 pm 
Offline
Causing or creating vexation

Joined: Wed Jul 21, 2004 10:32 pm
Posts: 19124
GT mowog wrote:
phillb wrote:
I thought in the early models the rad was stamped before painting and the firewall after. That's why the firewall often looks rusty. 


The firewalls are rusty from carelessness when filling the master cylinders.

The firewall is the first section of the car body that is made when assembling the bodies, so it was stamped at this early point to keep track of it.


Not really true with the Minis prior to mid 69. On those cars the firewall didn't get the number till after the car was made. On these cars the body number on the radiator shroud is painted and the car number on the firewall is stamped trough the paint.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jul 02, 2010 8:09 pm 
Offline
1098cc
1098cc

Joined: Sun Sep 26, 2004 2:19 am
Posts: 1574
Location: Geelong, Victoria
Quote:
Not really true with the Minis prior to mid 69. On those cars the firewall didn't get the number till after the car was made. On these cars the body number on the radiator shroud is painted and the car number on the firewall is stamped trough the paint.


I concur.

The body number was stamped before painting, and on pre-1969 and post-1970 Zetland cars the chassis number, which was stamped after final assembly, is the number on the firewall.

I am not 100% certain of this, but I believe the body number was not stamped on the car until it was a complete body - ie after the body was assembled but before painting. I will check into this a bit more.

Cheers,
Watto.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jul 02, 2010 8:30 pm 
Offline
1275cc
1275cc
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 20, 2009 11:24 am
Posts: 2276
Location: Wollongong
watto wrote:
Quote:
Not really true with the Minis prior to mid 69. On those cars the firewall didn't get the number till after the car was made. On these cars the body number on the radiator shroud is painted and the car number on the firewall is stamped trough the paint.


I concur.

The body number was stamped before painting, and on pre-1969 and post-1970 Zetland cars the chassis number, which was stamped after final assembly, is the number on the firewall.

I am not 100% certain of this, but I believe the body number was not stamped on the car until it was a complete body - ie after the body was assembled but before painting. I will check into this a bit more.

Cheers,
Watto.


One thing I also found interesting with the body no. on the rad shroud is that it looks to be stamped by machine, ie the numbers are perfectly even in depth and perfectly spaced. Perhaps they used a machine like a stapler.

The firewall number is the opposite, it is quite obviously stamped by hand. The numbers are unevenly spaced and varied depth.

_________________
Image
68 Morris Cooper S Mk1 (*ex 78 1275 LS 4th last built, 70 Morris 1500 OHC & 70 MiniMatic)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jul 02, 2010 9:01 pm 
Offline
1098cc
1098cc

Joined: Sun Sep 26, 2004 2:19 am
Posts: 1574
Location: Geelong, Victoria
Image

You mean like this? :wink:

Watto. :shock:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jul 02, 2010 9:16 pm 
Offline
Causing or creating vexation

Joined: Wed Jul 21, 2004 10:32 pm
Posts: 19124
Or this Mk1...

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jul 02, 2010 9:17 pm 
Offline
religious status
religious status
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 6:19 pm
Posts: 39754
Location: near Baulkham Hills, NSW
watto wrote:
Image

You mean like this? :wink:

Watto. :shock:

Those numbers on my 79 Moke looked like the guy was leaning drunk when he stamped it- could hardly read the tops of all the letters. :lol:

_________________
DrMini- 1970 wasaMatic 1360, Mk1S crank, 86.6HP (ATW) =~125 @ crank, 45 Dellorto (38 chokes), RE282 sprint cam, 1.5 rockers, 11.0:1 C/R. :mrgreen:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jul 02, 2010 9:41 pm 
Offline
1275cc
1275cc
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 20, 2009 11:24 am
Posts: 2276
Location: Wollongong
No that green one is Mk2 and that would be by hand. Mine is like Morris 1100's post.

Like this....

Image

...although the YG2S on the green one looks to be stamped using the same method as the earlier body no.

Didn't Mk2's have the body No. (500 less approx) in the bonnet gutter? What do these numbers look like?

_________________
Image
68 Morris Cooper S Mk1 (*ex 78 1275 LS 4th last built, 70 Morris 1500 OHC & 70 MiniMatic)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jul 02, 2010 9:47 pm 
Offline
1275cc
1275cc
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 20, 2009 11:24 am
Posts: 2276
Location: Wollongong
drmini in aust wrote:
Those numbers on my 79 Moke looked like the guy was leaning drunk when he stamped it- could hardly read the tops of all the letters. :lol:


I'm sure I saw a post on here where they had stamped the first no. (on the firewall) upside down, then obviiously thought "stuff-it" and stamped the whole number upside down. :shock: :lol:

_________________
Image
68 Morris Cooper S Mk1 (*ex 78 1275 LS 4th last built, 70 Morris 1500 OHC & 70 MiniMatic)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jul 02, 2010 10:21 pm 
Offline
1098cc
1098cc

Joined: Sun Sep 26, 2004 2:19 am
Posts: 1574
Location: Geelong, Victoria
The number on that green Mk2 (1969) is as all of the period I have seen. The YG2S is clearly one stamp. The 4 is a separate stamp, and would be replaced by a 1 or a 3 depending on the model. The rest of the chassis number is made up of four individual stampings.

The two Mk1 cowls shown look neater, but the gaps are still a little uneven and the horizontal alignment is not perfect, so I would question if they were done in one stamp or by a machine.

Yes, the 1969 cars had the body number in the rain channel. It had the M2/06 stamped one way, and the body number, 619, stamped from the opposite side. Of course 619 would look much the same from above or below, except the 1 is one-directional and is clearly up-side-down compared with the M2/06 (photo taken from the windscreen side).

Image

Cheers,
Watto.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 43 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 85 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

© 2016 Ausmini. All garage work involves equal measures of enthusiasm, ingenuity and a fair degree of irresponsibility.